ExiledInIllinois Posted January 14, 2010 Posted January 14, 2010 Making sense as usual again. That I am.
Chef Jim Posted January 14, 2010 Posted January 14, 2010 That I am. To yourself and that's probably it.
/dev/null Posted January 14, 2010 Posted January 14, 2010 That I am. I do not like green eggs and ham. I do not like them That I am
VABills Posted January 14, 2010 Posted January 14, 2010 I guess its not enough that all the other media outlets are flaming liberals...why are you bothered by one network leaning Republican? YOU are pathetic. Because you must all fall in line. When the Nazi (I mean liberal) party talks you should not dispute what they say.
Gene Frenkle Posted January 14, 2010 Posted January 14, 2010 For those defending Fox News, just face it. You are all funking sheep. Baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah!
RkFast Posted January 14, 2010 Posted January 14, 2010 For those defending Fox News, just face it. You are all funking sheep. Baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah! YOU are the guy who is all pissy over the ONE News Outlet running content and opinion counter to what Dear Leader and his minions want us to be spoon fed....the PONE outlet who is a voice of opposition to the norm and WE are the sheep? Thats comical. And asking someone to substantiate accusations with proof is not a "defense." "Defending" would mean someone leveled an accusation...BACKED IT UP WITH SOME PROOF OR TESTIMONY........and THEN someone would counter that with proof or testimony of their own. We cant do that becuase connor is a kitty.
keepthefaith Posted January 14, 2010 Posted January 14, 2010 For those defending Fox News, just face it. You are all funking sheep. Baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah! Sheep? Come on, defend the actions of your party this past year. Give us the merits of their leadership and actions. Point out for us "sheep" the results.
Gene Frenkle Posted January 14, 2010 Posted January 14, 2010 Sheep? Come on, defend the actions of your party this past year. Give us the merits of their leadership and actions. Point out for us "sheep" the results. Why do you need your news pre-spun? You don't really gain anything by reinforcing what you already think you know. You become nothing more than a herd animal.
pBills Posted January 14, 2010 Posted January 14, 2010 Because you must all fall in line. When the Nazi (I mean liberal) party talks you should not dispute what they say. HAHAHA that is awesome.
pBills Posted January 14, 2010 Posted January 14, 2010 Sheep? Come on, defend the actions of your party this past year. Give us the merits of their leadership and actions. Point out for us "sheep" the results. For Obama: http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/ For Congress: Who knows? Seems like whether they are democrat or republican it's always the same... do nothing but argue.
DC Tom Posted January 14, 2010 Posted January 14, 2010 For those defending Fox News, just face it. You are all funking sheep. Baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah! I'm not sure I've seen anyone defend FoxSnooze in this thread, as much as question the base of some of the reactionary criticism against them. Generally, "They're not dishonest, just stupid" isn't much of a defense.
Gene Frenkle Posted January 14, 2010 Posted January 14, 2010 I'm not sure I've seen anyone defend FoxSnooze in this thread, as much as question the base of some of the reactionary criticism against them. Generally, "They're not dishonest, just stupid" isn't much of a defense. I guess. I do see a lot of rooting for the laundry though. My ridiculous cable news network is less awful than yours.
ExiledInIllinois Posted January 14, 2010 Posted January 14, 2010 Because you must all fall in line. When the Nazi (I mean liberal) party talks you should not dispute what they say. That is communist, not Nazi. Conservatives fall on the Nazi side, liberals the communist side. Get it right.
Mark Vader Posted January 16, 2010 Posted January 16, 2010 Did anyone really think Fox (or any of the other "for profit" media outlets) was fair and balanced before this hiring? Give me a break. I do'nt think it, I know it.
Mark Vader Posted January 16, 2010 Posted January 16, 2010 Pat Buchanan does do bits on MSNBC... Who are the liberal choices at Fox? Bob Beckel Ellis Henican Alan Colmes Marc Lamont Hill Kirsten Powers Juan Williams
ExiledInIllinois Posted January 16, 2010 Posted January 16, 2010 Bob BeckelEllis Henican Alan Colmes Marc Lamont Hill Kirsten Powers Juan Williams You gotta be joking... Those are some heavy liberal hitters... Alan Colmes is the only one I recognize and he is Hannity's puppet. Who in the world are those people? Liberal stooges I take... Now I can see your point if say Fox got a big name liberal say: John Edwards. Again... Who the heck are those people you mentioned?
drnykterstein Posted January 16, 2010 Posted January 16, 2010 Bob BeckelEllis Henican Alan Colmes Marc Lamont Hill Kirsten Powers Juan Williams you forgot kermit the frog and howdy doody
Magox Posted January 16, 2010 Posted January 16, 2010 You gotta be joking... Those are some heavy liberal hitters... Alan Colmes is the only one I recognize and he is Hannity's puppet. Who in the world are those people? Liberal stooges I take... Now I can see your point if say Fox got a big name liberal say: John Edwards. Again... Who the heck are those people you mentioned? You're not familiar with Juan Williams?
Jim in Anchorage Posted January 16, 2010 Posted January 16, 2010 Bob BeckelEllis Henican Alan Colmes Marc Lamont Hill Kirsten Powers Juan Williams Actually I like Juan Williams. He presents good opinions and seems to be willing to listen to the other side. Colmes, on the other hand, is a mindless liberal zombie [or pretends to be, on the advice of his agent] And what is that one side eyebrow being higher than the other supposed to convey? A sense of skepticism?
DC Tom Posted January 16, 2010 Posted January 16, 2010 And what is that one side eyebrow being higher than the other supposed to convey? A sense of skepticism? I think it means he can smell what The Rock is cooking.
Recommended Posts