Gene Frenkle Posted January 12, 2010 Share Posted January 12, 2010 Yes the difference is Cons love helping people. We just don't like being forced to do so and having no control over who we help. I would prefer they lowered my taxes by 10% but I had to give that 10% to the charity of my choice. Unfortunately, human nature does not seem to back up your idealistic sentiment. If it were as easy as that, we'd have to find another fundamental principle to argue about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted January 12, 2010 Share Posted January 12, 2010 Unfortunately, human nature does not seem to back up your idealistic sentiment. If it were as easy as that, we'd have to find another fundamental principle to argue about. You're all getting off point. What are we going to do about children being labeled "at hope" when they're clearly not "at hope" but running a change deficit? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gene Frenkle Posted January 12, 2010 Share Posted January 12, 2010 You're all getting off point. What are we going to do about children being labeled "at hope" when they're clearly not "at hope" but running a change deficit? I'll go with my initial response to the ridiculous PC crap going on in this article: !@#$ing gay. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts