Canadian Bills Fan Posted January 8, 2010 Share Posted January 8, 2010 Obviously our two biggest needs are QB and LT. My question is this, would we really be doing the best thing for our franchise if we drafted him at #9? Say Okung or Trent Williams or Klausen is there? Maybe I don't know much about Rolando but is LB really a big enough need to spend a first round pick on? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VABills Posted January 8, 2010 Share Posted January 8, 2010 yes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
8-8 Forever? Posted January 8, 2010 Share Posted January 8, 2010 Obviously our two biggest needs are QB and LT. My question is this, would we really be doing the best thing for our franchise if we drafted him at #9? Say Okung or Trent Williams or Klausen is there? Maybe I don't know much about Rolando but is LB really a big enough need to spend a first round pick on? No, it is not. LT or QB has to be it. Being able to get Lefevour for QB in round 2 would be great. LT #1. That problem is not getting fixed in any way other than the draft. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted January 8, 2010 Share Posted January 8, 2010 Obviously our two biggest needs are QB and LT. My question is this, would we really be doing the best thing for our franchise if we drafted him at #9? Say Okung or Trent Williams or Klausen is there? Maybe I don't know much about Rolando but is LB really a big enough need to spend a first round pick on? Was getting Cornelius Bennett a big deal in 1987? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ProjectPat Posted January 8, 2010 Share Posted January 8, 2010 Fo Sho Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted January 8, 2010 Share Posted January 8, 2010 Was getting Cornelius Bennett a big deal in 1987? Yes. But the Bills already had Kelly and Wolford. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VABills Posted January 8, 2010 Share Posted January 8, 2010 And other than slow ass Mitchell and not quite as slow but still slow poz, we don't have a LB over 225 pounds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gfalk87 Posted January 8, 2010 Share Posted January 8, 2010 Getting McClain would be huge, it would give us the play making linebacker that we've lacked for years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrDawkinstein Posted January 8, 2010 Share Posted January 8, 2010 Yes. But the Bills already had Kelly and Wolford. do you really think there is a Kelly or Wolford even in this draft? i dont. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloWings Posted January 8, 2010 Share Posted January 8, 2010 do you really think there is a Kelly or Wolford even in this draft? i dont. Hard to say. We couldn't have said Kelly was Kelly in 1983, so that isn't answered until 2-3 years down the road. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lofton80 Posted January 8, 2010 Share Posted January 8, 2010 Teams need stars. Pick the most likely to be a difference maker at that spot. Clausen will be gone by 9. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beerball Posted January 8, 2010 Share Posted January 8, 2010 No, it is not. LT or QB has to be it. Being able to get Lefevour for QB in round 2 would be great. LT #1. That problem is not getting fixed in any way other than the draft. I do think that the best approach to drafting talent in the NFL is to first determine what position you are going to draft with each pick. That makes the whole process much easier to manage. Instead of a team having to choose between 3 or 4 or 5 players of 'equal' value who all play different positions you focus on a position. When your pick comes up you've already made your pick based on position. If Minnesota had taken this approach a couple years ago they wouldn't have gotten hosed into missing their pick. All we need to do now is determine what position gets picked in each round. Our major needs are: O-tackle, LB (inside and outside depending on scheme), QB, D-line, WR. How should we arrange our first 5 picks? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bananathumb Posted January 8, 2010 Share Posted January 8, 2010 Teams need stars. Pick the most likely to be a difference maker at that spot. Clausen will be gone by 9. So will Rolando. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R. Rich Posted January 8, 2010 Share Posted January 8, 2010 Teams need stars. Pick the most likely to be a difference maker at that spot. Agreed. You have to look @ the talent available where you're picking and get the most "bang for your buck", so to speak. The worst thing to do is to go into the draft looking to just draft a position, regardless of the talent available @ the time of the pick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrDawkinstein Posted January 8, 2010 Share Posted January 8, 2010 Hard to say. We couldn't have said Kelly was Kelly in 1983, so that isn't answered until 2-3 years down the road. a strong QB with a cannon arm and great accuracy that just won through his entire college career? no, there is no Kelly in this draft. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted January 8, 2010 Share Posted January 8, 2010 Yes. But the Bills already had Kelly and Wolford. True that. But how did the team play without Biscuit in the lineup, even with 12 & 68? If McClain truly is what is hyped - cerebral on field general that can disrupt offenses, you grab him without thinking at #9. If we rewind the clock with benefit of 20/20 hindsight to 2007, if Bills had the #9 slot, should they have gone for Willis or the best available QB or T at that slot? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fewell733 Posted January 8, 2010 Share Posted January 8, 2010 I don't think McClain is worth passing on a top left tackle. I just wasn't THAT impressed watching him last night. And for a linebacker to be picked in the top 10 he needs to be RIDICULOUS. being a field general on defense is great, but it doesn't warrant such a high pick unless it's backed by crazy athleticism. Willis ran a sub 4.4 40 and played like he was that fast at Ole Miss. I didn't see close to that kind of speed from McClain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bartshan-83 Posted January 8, 2010 Share Posted January 8, 2010 a strong QB with a cannon arm and great accuracy that just won through his entire college career? no, there is no Kelly in this draft. JC...closest you'll find....swagger and all. Make it happen Russ, Buddy, Bill, Leslie, Brian, Ralph Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloRebound Posted January 8, 2010 Share Posted January 8, 2010 I don't think McClain is worth passing on a top left tackle. I just wasn't THAT impressed watching him last night. And for a linebacker to be picked in the top 10 he needs to be RIDICULOUS. being a field general on defense is great, but it doesn't warrant such a high pick unless it's backed by crazy athleticism. Willis ran a sub 4.4 40 and played like he was that fast at Ole Miss. I didn't see close to that kind of speed from McClain. I agree. He doesn't look like he says great upper body strength. He also didn't look very explosive. I didn't see him shed blocks very well. He's good no doubt, but last night left me wondering if he doesn't benefit greatly from the Alabama Defensive Lineman giving him free lanes to the ball. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrDawkinstein Posted January 8, 2010 Share Posted January 8, 2010 JC...closest you'll find....swagger and all. Make it happen Russ, Buddy, Bill, Leslie, Brian, Ralph comparing Clausen to Kelly should be grounds for getting banned from the board Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts