Booster4324 Posted January 6, 2010 Posted January 6, 2010 East Bumfrick, Kansas, doesn't get the same media coverage that New York or LA do. It's as much about the publicity as it is about inflicting terror. I disagree, I think if they hit East Bumfrick and West Bumfick at the same time the nation would panic. The media would of course feed these fears while ignoring the fact more people died in car crashes in the same day.
Magox Posted January 6, 2010 Posted January 6, 2010 I disagree, I think if they hit East Bumfrick and West Bumfick at the same time the nation would panic. The media would of course feed these fears while ignoring the fact more people died in car crashes in the same day. If they did hit East Bumfrick then the Terrorist would not only have to fear the U.S government, but also the Tea Partiers. Could you just imagine Sheikh Mohammed tied up in a barn with a Tea Party affiliate named Zed. Frightening
Booster4324 Posted January 6, 2010 Posted January 6, 2010 If they did hit East Bumfrick then the Terrorist would not only have to fear the U.S government, but also the Tea Partiers. Could you just imagine Sheikh Mohammed tied up in a barn with a Tea Party affiliate named Zed. Frightening LOL We might have done better to simply let NY take on Afghanistan. I am finishing up Lone Survivor atm. It reinforces my belief that you should never go to war... unless you are willing to prosecute it to the fullest. Almost no holds barred.
Jim in Anchorage Posted January 6, 2010 Posted January 6, 2010 LOL We might have done better to simply let NY take on Afghanistan. I am finishing up Lone Survivor atm. It reinforces my belief that you should never go to war... unless you are willing to prosecute it to the fullest. Almost no holds barred. That would be the Powell Doctrine.
BuffaloBill Posted January 6, 2010 Author Posted January 6, 2010 I disagree, I think if they hit East Bumfrick and West Bumfick at the same time the nation would panic. The media would of course feed these fears while ignoring the fact more people died in car crashes in the same day. Amen
BillsWatch Posted January 6, 2010 Posted January 6, 2010 What a waste of time and money. Frankly, I feel less safe today than I did before 9/11. If the TSA wants to be serious about this stuff they need to deploy the best technology available and cut out the idiotic procedures that do nothing to make flying secure. TSA has always been a joke. The whole idea is to make the masses comfortable with flying again so they will spend their money.
keepthefaith Posted January 6, 2010 Posted January 6, 2010 If they did hit East Bumfrick then the Terrorist would not only have to fear the U.S government, but also the Tea Partiers. Could you just imagine Sheikh Mohammed tied up in a barn with a Tea Party affiliate named Zed. Frightening Justice would be served in short order.
Chalkie Gerzowski Posted January 6, 2010 Posted January 6, 2010 Spending a ton of money to not fix a problem--but say it's fixed--is what you vote for year after year. Anyone get fired for the Underpants Bomber yet? More of what you vote for yearly. Maybe Janet Reno Neapolitan? Had that Arizona border shut down like an iron wall.
Nanker Posted January 6, 2010 Posted January 6, 2010 It's all psychological bullcrap. I remember going to Newark (now "Liberty") airport right after 9-11 and being impressed and thankful that the Guard was there - in force patrolling with M16s or whatever. Then later heard they weren't given ammo. I think we should handle airline travel like the Israelis do.
Alaska Darin Posted January 6, 2010 Posted January 6, 2010 LOL We might have done better to simply let NY take on Afghanistan. I am finishing up Lone Survivor atm. It reinforces my belief that you should never go to war... unless you are willing to prosecute it to the fullest. Almost no holds barred. Welcome to the bandwagon.
ExiledInIllinois Posted January 6, 2010 Posted January 6, 2010 Honestly... I understand both sides of the argument... What are they going to do. SHould they just not have anything and hope for the best? Or should they just do what they were doing before the underwear incident? Really... What should they do?
Recommended Posts