Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Prior to this game, Bledsoe had the following stats which I used

for the "inter-pletion" ratio:

 

133 completions

10 interceptions

25 sacks

==========

 

 

133 (completions) / (10 (interceptions) + 25 (sacks)) = a ratio of 3.8

 

For every 3.8 completed passes, Bledsoe is either sacked or picked.

 

WOW. If there is anyone worse in the league than this, let me know.

 

Pick a really bad qb and apply the formula. :lol:

Posted
this post = mc2 = way too much time on your hands

 

:lol: --- just kiddin with ya ... interesting formula though

127089[/snapback]

 

 

I'm sorry. I just can't walk away from listening to the game on the

internet, and to disapointed to really pay much attention.

Posted

here's some encouraging numbers...

bledsoe has thrown 11 passes today, he's 8/10 and the other was nullified on a pass interference.

2/2 to mcgahee

2/2 to cambell

2/4 to evans. 1 interception (tipped) and 1 incompletion nullified on pass interference

2/3 to moulds

 

doesn't seem to have the tunnel vision to moulds

 

yet...

Posted
So if a qb completes 100 passes and is not int or sacked his rating is a zero??? HUH!!!

127111[/snapback]

 

 

Well, it is a ratio, not a rating. However, if a QB existed that did not have a

sack or an int., he woul not have an "inter-pletion" ratio.

 

What does this all mean, I don't know?

Posted

Quicy Carter, today's game:

3 completions, 5 sacks. For every .6 completions, he gets sacked. :lol:. Also, anything over zero is undefined, not zero. If you don't get sacked or picked, you have a mathematically impossible ratio - that's kinda cool.

×
×
  • Create New...