Kingfish Posted January 4, 2010 Posted January 4, 2010 http://www.courthousenews.com/2010/01/04/23294.htm
Bring Back Kelly Posted January 4, 2010 Posted January 4, 2010 Here is the link: http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/...marshawn-lynch/
Maddog69 Posted January 4, 2010 Posted January 4, 2010 This is not newsworthy. This is a moneygrab that was fully expected to happen at some point.
Doc Posted January 4, 2010 Posted January 4, 2010 Gee, that only took a year and a half. I'd like to see how they prove "in an intoxicated state," much less hear about the "serious injuries" she suffered.
aristocrat Posted January 4, 2010 Posted January 4, 2010 i thought he had settled this right after the accident. i am surprised it took this long
Fewell733 Posted January 4, 2010 Posted January 4, 2010 Gee, that only took a year and a half. I'd like to see how they prove "in an intoxicated state," much less hear about the "serious injuries" she suffered. standard of proof is lower.
BillsGuyInMalta Posted January 4, 2010 Posted January 4, 2010 Gee, that only took a year and a half. I'd like to see how they prove "in an intoxicated state," much less hear about the "serious injuries" she suffered. I was thinking the same thing. I love how it took that long for her to figure out that she was "injured". Don't jump on me now, totally not defending what Lynch did...but this is so clearly an attempt to wiggle some more cash out of the situation.
RJ (not THAT RJ) Posted January 4, 2010 Posted January 4, 2010 I was thinking the same thing. I love how it took that long for her to figure out that she was "injured". Don't jump on me now, totally not defending what Lynch did...but this is so clearly an attempt to wiggle some more cash out of the situation. I think you and other posters are right on. She (or, more precisely, she and her ambulance chasing lawyer) probably hope that simply filing this suit will lead to a quick cash settlement. It is all perfectly legal within the system, and nothing less than Lynch deserves for being such a bonehead, even if it may leave a bad taste in some mouths.
Doc Posted January 4, 2010 Posted January 4, 2010 standard of proof is lower. What proof, of any kind, is there?
Doc Posted January 4, 2010 Posted January 4, 2010 I think you and other posters are right on. She (or, more precisely, she and her ambulance chasing lawyer) probably hope that simply filing this suit will lead to a quick cash settlement. It is all perfectly legal within the system, and nothing less than Lynch deserves for being such a bonehead, even if it may leave a bad taste in some mouths. Oh, she deserves money for her troubles. Lynch was driving the vehicle that hit her, so she's due compensation. What's distasteful is trumping-up the injuries and making baseless accusations.
Endzone Animal Posted January 4, 2010 Posted January 4, 2010 When it's all said and done, and Lynch's sub-par career is reflected upon, the night of his hit-and-run will be seen as the watershed moment when he went from promising young talent to a lowlife waste of talent.
wonderbread Posted January 4, 2010 Posted January 4, 2010 What proof, of any kind, is there? as long as its 80 proof Marshawn is bringing it in the club.
Kingfish Posted January 4, 2010 Author Posted January 4, 2010 Oh, she deserves money for her troubles. Lynch was driving the vehicle that hit her, so she's due compensation. What's distasteful is trumping-up the injuries and making baseless accusations. Your proof?
loyal2dagame Posted January 4, 2010 Posted January 4, 2010 Gee, that only took a year and a half. I'd like to see how they prove "in an intoxicated state," much less hear about the "serious injuries" she suffered. i am surprised it took this long the thing is they never file suit immediately when serious injury or death is not involved. this gives the "victim" a chance to substantiate their suit with loss of work, med bills and visits to chriopractor i see suits from auto accidents that are served 1 day before the 3 year statute expires.
RJ (not THAT RJ) Posted January 4, 2010 Posted January 4, 2010 the thing is they never file suit immediately when serious injury or death is not involved. this gives the "victim" a chance to substantiate their suit with med bills and visits to chriopractor i see suits from auto accidents that are served 1 day before the 3 year statute expires. Excellent point.
Doc Posted January 4, 2010 Posted January 4, 2010 Your proof? She received stitches at an ED and was released after a few hours. She went to work the following Monday. And she was followed by reporters for several weeks afterwards, without a mention of any "serious" injuries by her/her attorney.
Kingfish Posted January 4, 2010 Author Posted January 4, 2010 She received stitches at an ED and was released after a few hours. She went to work the following Monday. And she was followed by reporters for several weeks afterwards, without a mention of any "serious" injuries by her/her attorney. Link(s) please?
Recommended Posts