ConradDobler Posted January 1, 2010 Posted January 1, 2010 Over on the main board I keep seeing comments about "end of the decade". There was no year zero. The decade ends twelve months from yesterday.
Arkady Renko Posted January 1, 2010 Posted January 1, 2010 Over on the main board I keep seeing comments about "end of the decade".There was no year zero. The decade ends twelve months from yesterday. The majority of people who realize this also realize that it's not worth worrying about and just move on and go with the flow.
Wacka Posted January 1, 2010 Posted January 1, 2010 Over on the main board I keep seeing comments about "end of the decade".There was no year zero. The decade ends twelve months from yesterday. You mean tomorrow. Where I am it's still yesterdyy.
Marv's Neighbor Posted January 1, 2010 Posted January 1, 2010 Over on the main board I keep seeing comments about "end of the decade".There was no year zero. The decade ends twelve months from yesterday. Sounds like a Y2K thing to me!
Dan Posted January 1, 2010 Posted January 1, 2010 Over on the main board I keep seeing comments about "end of the decade".There was no year zero. The decade ends twelve months from yesterday. So, the year 2000 was only a dream? 1. 00 2. 01 3. 02 4. 03 5. 04 6. 05 7. 06 8. 07 9. 08 10. 09 10 years equals a decade. At leasts that's the decade I think everyone's talking about. Maybe not though.
LeviF Posted January 1, 2010 Posted January 1, 2010 So, the year 2000 was only a dream? 1. 00 2. 01 3. 02 4. 03 5. 04 6. 05 7. 06 8. 07 9. 08 10. 09 10 years equals a decade. At leasts that's the decade I think everyone's talking about. Maybe not though. I think he's saying that the calendar went from 1 BCE to 1 CE, with no year 0. So the first decade was: 1. 1 CE 2. 2 CE 3. 3 CE 4. 4 CE 5. 5 CE 6. 6 CE 7. 7 CE 8. 8 CE 9. 9 CE 10. 10 CE And so, the current decade would have started with 2001.
John Adams Posted January 1, 2010 Posted January 1, 2010 Over on the main board I keep seeing comments about "end of the decade".There was no year zero. The decade ends twelve months from yesterday. Do you think there is some accurate astronomical measure of the date of Jesus's (if he was real) birth?
kegtapr Posted January 1, 2010 Posted January 1, 2010 When you die, are you really going to care what decade it is?
Fezmid Posted January 1, 2010 Posted January 1, 2010 When you die, are you really going to care what decade it is? I'm alive, and I don't.
/dev/null Posted January 1, 2010 Posted January 1, 2010 The majority of people who realize this also realize that it's not worth worrying about and just move on and go with the flow. /end_thread I tried explaining this to people in 1999/2000 but nobody cared or understood. So eh, can't beat 'em join 'em
Dan Posted January 1, 2010 Posted January 1, 2010 I think he's saying that the calendar went from 1 BCE to 1 CE, with no year 0. So the first decade was:1. 1 CE 2. 2 CE 3. 3 CE 4. 4 CE 5. 5 CE 6. 6 CE 7. 7 CE 8. 8 CE 9. 9 CE 10. 10 CE And so, the current decade would have started with 2001. True. But, no one is saying we're remembering the 200th decade or anything like that. They're just saying, we're remembering the last decade - the decade of 00's.
dib Posted January 1, 2010 Posted January 1, 2010 When you die, are you really going to care what decade it is? When you're dead, you're dead for a long time.
Arkady Renko Posted January 1, 2010 Posted January 1, 2010 I think he's saying that the calendar went from 1 BCE to 1 CE, with no year 0. So the first decade was:1. 1 CE 2. 2 CE 3. 3 CE 4. 4 CE 5. 5 CE 6. 6 CE 7. 7 CE 8. 8 CE 9. 9 CE 10. 10 CE And so, the current decade would have started with 2001. BC -> AD, tyia.
billsfan89 Posted January 1, 2010 Posted January 1, 2010 Over on the main board I keep seeing comments about "end of the decade".There was no year zero. The decade ends twelve months from yesterday. Decade is more metaphorical then literal. I don't think 1990 is part of the 1980's or 1980 is part of the 1970's. Now if you want to say the first 2 to 3 years of a decade are just a hangover from the previous one that would be true. But to say that we aren't in a new decade is taking the complete wrong definition of a decade. A decade is a 10 year measurement not the measurement of every 10 years (IF that makes any sense).
Dr. Fong Posted January 2, 2010 Posted January 2, 2010 So the first decade, 2000 years ago had nine years in it. And each subsequent decade has ten. There problem solved. The real question is why every ten years do we have to subjected to a bunch of know-it-all's running around telling everyone something they already know. It's all a psychological association with numbers. As someone pointed out earlier 1980 is a year that is associated with the 80s, it'd be foolish to try to include it in a discussion of the 70s.
Stussy109 Posted January 2, 2010 Posted January 2, 2010 When you're dead, you're dead for a long time. thats what you think
BLZFAN4LIFE Posted January 2, 2010 Posted January 2, 2010 I think decades should go to 11. Good call.
Recommended Posts