Talley56 Posted December 30, 2009 Share Posted December 30, 2009 Brady and Big Ben is splitting hairs but I still say Roethlisberger should have gone in ahead of him. But the fact that he got in over Schaub is a travesty. While it is not surprising that the NFL's love child got in it still sucks. And while Rivers got in he should have gone in ahead of Brady, but again, not surprising that Brady got in over him either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thoner7 Posted December 30, 2009 Share Posted December 30, 2009 "Hold on while I take Bradys d*ick out of my mouth and explain this...." - the NFL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C.Biscuit97 Posted December 30, 2009 Share Posted December 30, 2009 Schaub has a good case but Brady has more tds and less ints on a team with a better record. I hate all things NE but Brady definitely had a pro bowl season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
apuszczalowski Posted December 30, 2009 Share Posted December 30, 2009 Obviously Brady is a much better QB, it has to be true cause he was voted into the Pro Bowl and only the best make the Pro Bowl, or atleast thats the arguement for Jason Peters. He made the Pro bowl so obviously he is the best Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MRW Posted December 30, 2009 Share Posted December 30, 2009 "Travesty" is pretty strong. Comparing the stats for Schaub, Brady, and Roethlisberger they seem just about the same, and really they all had Pro Bowl worthy seasons. So I'm not really feeling the outrage that Brady got in... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts