lock for a top 10 pick

[Pete]

1. St. Louis 1-14

2. Detroit 2-13

3. Tampa Bay 3-12

4. Kansas City 3-12

5. Cleveland 4-11

6. Washington 4-10

7. Seattle 5-10

8. Denver (from Chicago) 5-9

9. Buffalo 5-10

10. Oakland 5-10

 

Go Chicago! Go Washington!

 

I am not sure what the tie breaker is for draft order is- but we can move up a few spots possibly

[fansince61]

The tie breaker is the ease of schedule. The easier the schedule, the worse the pick. We lose that one to most teams at 5-10.

[McBeane]

The tie breaker is the ease of schedule. The easier the schedule, the higher the pick. We lose that one to most teams at 5-10.

 

There, its a little more clear now.

[Pete]

1. St. Louis 1-14

2. Detroit 2-13

3. Tampa Bay 3-12

4. Kansas City 3-12

5. Cleveland 4-11

6. Washington 4-10

7. Buffalo 5-10

8.Seattle 5-10

9. Denver (from Chicago) 5-9

10. Oakland 5-10

 

updated

[Boatdrinks]

Bills strength of schedule for 2009 is sixth. Of the teams currently in the running for a top ten pick, only Tampa was higher than sixth, but they will draft before buffalo as they will finish with less than five wins. So Buffalo (if they lose to the Manning-less Colts) would pick after any teams having the same record as they do based on the strength of schedule tiebreaker. So the only thing to hope for draft wise is that no teams finish with the same number of losses as the Bills.

[flmike]

Why do you keep doing this to yourself? We'll pick the 9th best punter or something with a top ten pick. I won't even get interested until I know real football people are doing the picking...