uncle_chappy Posted December 28, 2009 Author Share Posted December 28, 2009 No, I already read it and pointed out to you that it doesn't say what you think it says. I'm asking you to read it to yourself, and point out where it says we're foregoing any of our sovreignty. are you sure you have read the law? thanks for making my point for me, either you've suffered a severe head trauma today or you're half-assing a devils advocate act. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted December 28, 2009 Share Posted December 28, 2009 are you sure you have read the law? thanks for making my point for me, either you've suffered a severe head trauma today or you're half-assing a devils advocate act. What point is this that I'm supposed to have made for you? That we ceded soveringty to Interpol? I've already pointed out - repeatedly, with sources - that that's completely incorrect. We merely can't tax them or seize their property. I've also provided you those very sources, so you can demonstrate where you think I'm incorrect. And you haven't. And can't. And still insist you're right, with your best "Neener, neener! Your mother wears army boots!" debating tactic that you can manage. Making it pretty clear which of us is suffering from severe head trauma. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Adams Posted December 28, 2009 Share Posted December 28, 2009 "actual facts" dc tom didnt offer any "actual facts", just the liberal rationalization of obama's latest achievement. Capitalization would raise your argument from the primordial ooze level. Knowing where to put that comma after "facts" would justify your childish grammar attack. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uncle_chappy Posted December 29, 2009 Author Share Posted December 29, 2009 What point is this that I'm supposed to have made for you? That we ceded soveringty to Interpol? I've already pointed out - repeatedly, with sources - that that's completely incorrect. We merely can't tax them or seize their property. now that the holidays are over and hopefully your head is cleared can you please re-read the order/law and explain to us how this is merely an issue of tax exemption. thank you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted December 29, 2009 Share Posted December 29, 2009 now that the holidays are over and hopefully your head is cleared can you please re-read the order/law and explain to us how this is merely an issue of tax exemption. thank you. I already did. The sections that the executive order made applicable to Interpol deal with property rights and taxation. You can read it yourself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uncle_chappy Posted December 29, 2009 Author Share Posted December 29, 2009 I already did. The sections that the executive order made applicable to Interpol deal with property rights and taxation. You can read it yourself. and what about FOIA requests? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted December 29, 2009 Share Posted December 29, 2009 and what about FOIA requests? Again... The Freedom of Information Act only applies to federal government agencies. It never applied to Interpol to begin with. http://www.justice.gov/oip/foia_updates/Vol_XVII_4/page2.htm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave_In_Norfolk Posted December 29, 2009 Share Posted December 29, 2009 Do you know what the word "usurp" means? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted December 29, 2009 Share Posted December 29, 2009 Do you know what the word "usurp" means? When Monica finished Bill said usurp that right up Sorry, couldn't resist such a bad pun Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pBills Posted December 30, 2009 Share Posted December 30, 2009 "actual facts" dc tom didnt offer any "actual facts", just the liberal rationalization of obama's latest achievement. Tom's a liberal? Who knew? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uncle_chappy Posted January 2, 2010 Author Share Posted January 2, 2010 now would probably be a good time to remind everyone about obama's "civilian national security force"....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts