yall Posted December 21, 2009 Posted December 21, 2009 Then who was that QB who was up and limbering up when Fitz got banged up after coming back in the game. Don't stop him - he's on a roll. Seriously though - neither TE or RF should be the #1 QB going into camp for the 2010 season. The front office will need to address the QB needs either through free agency or the draft. But as long as you have one unknown on the roster, and zero playoff hopes, why not find out what you can about the #3 QB?
CountDorkula Posted December 21, 2009 Posted December 21, 2009 Hey... I tried this before and got nothing but bashed on here.... Well why not now.... And when he is bad, we should all throw sticks at him because he didnt win a game. I'm all for it, but you know the Brohm bashers are waiting anxiously to rip him apart. after being with the team 3 weeks and not getting snaps with 1st team offense, and then not winning a game against a playofff fighting team and a team trying to go 16-0.
thewildrabbit Posted December 21, 2009 Posted December 21, 2009 Because it is really stupid to have an inexperienced QB start behind a really bad offensive line. I'm glad the coaches realize this even if nobody on this board does.
Big Turk Posted December 22, 2009 Posted December 22, 2009 Hey... I tried this before and got nothing but bashed on here.... Well why not now.... Probably because he doesn't even know 1/3 of the playbook and he sucks just as bad as the other 2 except they could only run 1/3 of the plays? If all we have left is to root for is a guy to play that we picked up from another teams Practice Squad late in the season because he sucked so bad he couldn't even make their roster when they have no backup QBs, then we are in a really pathetic state. This coupled with the fact that even if Brohm came in and played the last 2 games lights out, it would mean next to nothing anyway. It typically takes 4 or 5 weeks to get enough film on QBs to really see their tendencies and scheme accordingly. Think how great Sanchez looked for the first 4 or 5 games, and then what happened after that...
Doc Posted December 22, 2009 Posted December 22, 2009 Because it is really stupid to have an inexperienced QB start behind a really bad offensive line. It's stupid...why? Will the Bills score fewer than 10 points? And if so, would the excuse that Brohm sucked because he's inexperienced and played behind a really bad OL be worse than saying Ryan Fitzpatrick sucked despite having experience?
Bills Fan888 Posted December 22, 2009 Posted December 22, 2009 It's stupid...why? Will the Bills score fewer than 10 points? And if so, would the excuse that Brohm sucked because he's inexperienced and played behind a really bad OL be worse than saying Ryan Fitzpatrick sucked despite having experience? It's stupid because that's why all the past QB's we have aren't starters on other teams. This is what's ruining the QB's we have.
yall Posted December 22, 2009 Posted December 22, 2009 I wish everyone would get off this 'Bills ruin QB's' nonsense. The line should be that 'the Bills historically pick lousy QB's'.
K Gun Special Posted December 22, 2009 Posted December 22, 2009 Probably because he doesn't even know 1/3 of the playbook and he sucks just as bad as the other 2 except they could only run 1/3 of the plays? If all we have left is to root for is a guy to play that we picked up from another teams Practice Squad late in the season because he sucked so bad he couldn't even make their roster when they have no backup QBs, then we are in a really pathetic state. This coupled with the fact that even if Brohm came in and played the last 2 games lights out, it would mean next to nothing anyway. It typically takes 4 or 5 weeks to get enough film on QBs to really see their tendencies and scheme accordingly. Think how great Sanchez looked for the first 4 or 5 games, and then what happened after that... be careful common sense doesnt sit well around these parts. great post.
Recommended Posts