Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

He FLEW up the board in the week leading up to the 2009 draft. Whether his leap was because of his talent or whether he was chalked up as a sure-thing for the Chiefs and made the jump accordingly remains uncertain, I guess.

Posted

He went as high as he did because in most evaluations, he was the prototypical 5-technique 3-4 DE!! The Chiefs under the new coaching regime, was shifting to the 3-4, and sans a true NT in the first round in April, they opted (in their opinion) for the best DE fit. I can't quite blame them because I believe, in time, he will be a monster at that position, especially IF they find a NT, going forward!!

Posted

Tyson Jackson has started all but one game this year for the Chiefs.

 

I think if he sucked, they would sit him on the bench.

 

I think he's a tremendous talent and will become a Richard Seymour type player.

 

The guy was a wrecking ball in college playing against top SEC competition.

 

Stats can be so irrelevant, especially for a 3-4 defensive end.

Posted
He went as high as he did because in most evaluations, he was the prototypical 5-technique 3-4 DE!! The Chiefs under the new coaching regime, was shifting to the 3-4, and sans a true NT in the first round in April, they opted (in their opinion) for the best DE fit. I can't quite blame them because I believe, in time, he will be a monster at that position, especially IF they find a NT, going forward!!

 

5-technique is outside the tackle, right?

Posted

not sure players at his position really put up many stats. Mostly they hold their ground for others to make plays. But I'm not thinking the Chiefs make many plays, period.

Posted

He rose up the draft boards because there is an extreme shortage on 3-4 players. Which is the biggest reason why it would be idiotic to switch to the 3-4.

×
×
  • Create New...