Buffalo_Stampede Posted December 1, 2009 Posted December 1, 2009 Trent Edwards and Jauron cost us the AFC East. How do you lose 6-3 to the Browns at home?
dave mcbride Posted December 1, 2009 Posted December 1, 2009 Trent Edwards and Jauron cost us the AFC East. How do you lose 6-3 to the Browns at home? No, the Bills should be 4-7 and the Pats should be 7-4. You are what your record says you are. The Pats beat the Bills fair and square because they were the better team late. And the Bills certainly deserved to lose to the Browns, who, believe it or not, outplayed the Bills.
Buffalo_Stampede Posted December 1, 2009 Author Posted December 1, 2009 No, the Bills should be 4-7 and the Pats should be 7-4. You are what your record says you are. The Pats beat the Bills fair and square because they were the better team late. And the Bills certainly deserved to lose to the Browns, who, believe it or not, outplayed the Bills. The Bills did not deserve to lose to the Browns. Derrick Anderson was 2-17 or something. Unreal.
Rubes Posted December 1, 2009 Posted December 1, 2009 Trent Edwards and Jauron cost us the AFC East. How do you lose 6-3 to the Browns at home? The same way you lose 25-24 to the Pats*.
PistolPeaTear Posted December 1, 2009 Posted December 1, 2009 Trent Edwards and Jauron cost us the AFC East. How do you lose 6-3 to the Browns at home? We should have won Superbowl XXV too
VADC Bills Posted December 1, 2009 Posted December 1, 2009 No, the Bills should be 4-7 and the Pats should be 7-4. You are what your record says you are. The Pats beat the Bills fair and square because they were the better team late. And the Bills certainly deserved to lose to the Browns, who, believe it or not, outplayed the Bills. I agree......we lost due to a lack of situational coaching. We were just too stupid to win those games.
Malazan Posted December 1, 2009 Posted December 1, 2009 Well, the Bills can prove it by winning out which would give them a fair shot at winning the division. (How ridiculous is it that the Bills still even have the possibility?)
47Yards Posted December 1, 2009 Posted December 1, 2009 The Bills did not deserve to lose to the Browns. Derrick Anderson was 2-17 or something. Unreal. I was there. No one deserved to win that game.
ChasBB Posted December 1, 2009 Posted December 1, 2009 I said in the beginning of the year that if Jauron got off to a bad start that a change in HC needed to happen EARLY (week 4 or 5) in order to save the season and not to wait for the bye week (or later). But nooo, Ralphie had to go and let Jauron ruin any hope for a playoff appearance before switching HC -- always the way with this team.
Cotton Fitzsimmons Posted December 1, 2009 Posted December 1, 2009 Well, the Bills can prove it by winning out which would give them a fair shot at winning the division. (How ridiculous is it that the Bills still even have the possibility?) If we pull this thing out and win the division, Ye Ole' is gonna be hoppin' around his living room yelling "f'in A! f'inA! I gotta a feeling... Buffalo's goin to the SUPER BOWL!!!!"
BillsFan-4-Ever Posted December 1, 2009 Posted December 1, 2009 Trent Edwards and Jauron cost us the AFC East. How do you lose 6-3 to the Browns at home? Should be ??? It's more like they had the opportunity. And you can get off the I hate Edwards bandwagon. Put the blame where it belongs on Juaron. Who couldn't see that Freddy J has been better that Marshawn all season? Who called in the plays on tough downs? Certainley not Edwards? The Bills lost a few games because of bad breaks on tipped passes and a few fumbles at THE worst time at the begining of the season. And what was Tasker saying -- compete for the division when they play the Putrids? The Bills have to win out and the Putz lose out. Hey Steve pass the doobie this way.
tennesseeboy Posted December 1, 2009 Posted December 1, 2009 No, the Bills should be 4-7 and the Pats should be 7-4. You are what your record says you are. The Pats beat the Bills fair and square because they were the better team late. And the Bills certainly deserved to lose to the Browns, who, believe it or not, outplayed the Bills. Exactly. It is what it is. The fact is that Dick Jauron and Trent Edwards were part of the Bills who lost to New England and Cleveland. Hopefully they have taken some actions that will improve the team in what's left of the season. The idea that we "should" have won games is a loser mindset. We lost. We have to learn how to win.
Mickey Posted December 1, 2009 Posted December 1, 2009 Trent Edwards and Jauron cost us the AFC East. How do you lose 6-3 to the Browns at home? I don't believe in "should be". Every team in the league can claim that they "should" have won a game or two that they lost. A loss is a loss. Most losses can be traced to a few mistakes. Our losses are not all that different from anyone elses. Falling apart is falling apart, whether you do it in the first quarter or the fourth.
Mickey Posted December 1, 2009 Posted December 1, 2009 Well, the Bills can prove it by winning out which would give them a fair shot at winning the division. (How ridiculous is it that the Bills still even have the possibility?) Its not ridiculous at all. Given that we are only talking about mathematical possibilities, hardly anyone is totally eliminated at this point. The only thing that has changed from two weeks ago is a single win. What Fewel has shown us is that there is such a thing as being too careful and that a gamble here and there pays off sometimes. The team is fun to watch again and for that alone I am content, for this season anyway. Too many injuries and too far behind to have a realistic chance at the playoffs but who cares? We just beat the #%^#%^%$ fins.
GG Posted December 1, 2009 Posted December 1, 2009 And if Bills beat NE & Browns, Jauron is still coach ... and Bills don't beat Miami. No thanks.
billsfreak Posted December 1, 2009 Posted December 1, 2009 Trent Edwards and Jauron cost us the AFC East. How do you lose 6-3 to the Browns at home? Should be, could be, would be, but we're not. Those two weren't the only ones to cost us. Leodis McFumble cost us a game, Parrish cost us one. We have the worst ranked run defense in the NFL. If not the worst Offensive Line in the NFL, then one of the worst 2 or 3. You can't blame it all on two people because one is fired and one is benched. This dismal season has been a total team effort.
stuckincincy Posted December 1, 2009 Posted December 1, 2009 The Bills did not deserve to lose to the Browns. Derrick Anderson was 2-17 or something. Unreal. I'd say getting beat in OT at home by a winless team with a 2-17 passing performance qualifies as a well-deserved loss.
StamerforPrez Posted December 1, 2009 Posted December 1, 2009 There's no way we should be 6-5, I guess we could be, but we are not a 6-5 team. Being 6-5 means we would be just a little better than mediocre and mediocre teams come out of a 3-3 game against the browns winning 6-3 instead of losing 6-3
Bleed Bills Blue Posted December 1, 2009 Posted December 1, 2009 And if Bills beat NE & Browns, Jauron is still coach ... and Bills don't beat Miami. No thanks. And probably beat no one else the rest of the season. Good point.
Recommended Posts