DarthICE Posted November 26, 2009 Posted November 26, 2009 'Follow the owner, follow the QUARTERBACK, and you will find out where Shanahan will go'. Again, lets start looking for a damn good GM and let him bring in a staff and HC. I just don't see the Bills being attractive to any of the top 'name' coaches. Now I am not saying that is a bad thing, I am just thinking it is what it is.
billsfan89 Posted November 26, 2009 Posted November 26, 2009 'Follow the owner, follow the QUARTERBACK, and you will find out where Shanahan will go'. Again, lets start looking for a damn good GM and let him bring in a staff and HC. I just don't see the Bills being attractive to any of the top 'name' coaches. Now I am not saying that is a bad thing, I am just thinking it is what it is. The money seems to be right (If that 10 million a year mark is right) and the owner seems to be willing to give up control to Shanny as well. Also Shanny is an egomaniac which means the challenge could be enticing to him. I don't know if Shanny will come here or not. BUT I do know that they are doing everything they can to land him which is an encouraging sign. Also because we are looking for Shanny as HC and GM doesn't mean we are not looking for a GM as well.
Albany,n.y. Posted November 26, 2009 Posted November 26, 2009 'Follow the owner, follow the QUARTERBACK, and you will find out where Shanahan will go'. Again, lets start looking for a damn good GM and let him bring in a staff and HC. I just don't see the Bills being attractive to any of the top 'name' coaches. Now I am not saying that is a bad thing, I am just thinking it is what it is. The QB that our next coach will start isn't on the team. So, if a coach feels that the right guy will be available where we draft or is willing to trade up, or cooks up some trade to get a veteran, why would our current group of QBs deter him from coming? I'd think the QB situation on a lot of other teams, where if the new coach didn't like the guy and couldn't get rid of him due to cap constraints, would be a lot bigger detriment than a team that can cheaply jettison the guys they have. If a guy wants total control, he's going to get rid of a lot of players, QBs included.
Flbillsfan#1 Posted November 26, 2009 Posted November 26, 2009 The QB that our next coach will start isn't on the team. So, if a coach feels that the right guy will be available where we draft or is willing to trade up, or cooks up some trade to get a veteran, why would our current group of QBs deter him from coming? I'd think the QB situation on a lot of other teams, where if the new coach didn't like the guy and couldn't get rid of him due to cap constraints, would be a lot bigger detriment than a team that can cheaply jettison the guys they have. If a guy wants total control, he's going to get rid of a lot of players, QBs included. Agreed, & who does Washington have at QB that is so enticing?
rackemrack Posted November 26, 2009 Posted November 26, 2009 I'd like to think a guy like shannahan would enjoy the challenge of coming to buffalo and making the bills a competitor again, not only as a head coach, but also sharing GM duties with Russ. I think thats also what Russ and Ralph have in mind and is why they went after him, holmgren, and cowher who would all have the same roll
MRW Posted November 26, 2009 Posted November 26, 2009 The QB that our next coach will start isn't on the team. So, if a coach feels that the right guy will be available where we draft or is willing to trade up, or cooks up some trade to get a veteran, why would our current group of QBs deter him from coming? I'd think the QB situation on a lot of other teams, where if the new coach didn't like the guy and couldn't get rid of him due to cap constraints, would be a lot bigger detriment than a team that can cheaply jettison the guys they have. If a guy wants total control, he's going to get rid of a lot of players, QBs included. That is one thing that could make the Buffalo job enticing for someone who wants total control - not a lot of contracts where you'd incur a salary cap hit for cutting them, so whoever is running the show would have a free hand to bring in his own players. Even Schobel and Kelsay are getting on in their contracts so I don't think there would be too much of a hit to get rid of them if desired. The recent big contracts/extensions I can think of are Evans, McGee, Stroud, but no others really spring to mind.
rackemrack Posted November 26, 2009 Posted November 26, 2009 Agreed, & who does Washington have at QB that is so enticing? todd collins
BillsObserver Posted November 26, 2009 Posted November 26, 2009 still trying to figure out the update
BillsObserver Posted November 26, 2009 Posted November 26, 2009 Oh wait I get it. So, you need a quarterback to land Shanahan. Guess every team looking for a coach is screwed then.
N.Y. Orangeman Posted November 26, 2009 Posted November 26, 2009 still trying to figure out the update Yeah...me too.
Canadian Bills Fan Posted November 26, 2009 Posted November 26, 2009 Oh wait I get it. So, you need a quarterback to land Shanahan. Guess every team looking for a coach is screwed then. Not Dallas (If Wade gets fired)
BillsObserver Posted November 26, 2009 Posted November 26, 2009 Not Dallas (If Wade gets fired) if if if if if iif fi fi fi fif if if ifi fi fi fiififififififif iif fifi fiif if IF
BillsObserver Posted November 26, 2009 Posted November 26, 2009 Or Chicago lol Maybe it's just me but I still question how good Cutler is. I know he doesn't have a lot to work with there in terms of receivers but he has made some extremely questionable throws in the last few games. Remember when we wanted him so badly? The results would have been even worse here.
Cotton Fitzsimmons Posted November 26, 2009 Posted November 26, 2009 So the update is...? Nice thread. Agree. Title says "NFLN update"? What's the point?
Recommended Posts