PromoTheRobot Posted November 20, 2009 Posted November 20, 2009 - Buffalo is not as unattractive a job as some fans think. Oakland is toxic. Buffalo is not. - Don't get hung up on name coaches. The names fail just as often as they succeed. - Suggested Mike Zimmer from Cinci, a DC with a Parcells pedigree. PTR
LABills08 Posted November 20, 2009 Posted November 20, 2009 There is a lot to like about Zimmer. However, I am wary of hiring another DC to serve as head coach. This isn't because I have a problem with defensive coordinators as head coaches. If you look at the best NFL coaches many have a strong defensive pedigree. But, a lot of these head coaches also have/had a very strong, independent play caller on the offensive side. Unless the Bills sign a strong offensive coordinator, I'm not sure I'm happy with a Zimmer-type hiring.
DarthICE Posted November 20, 2009 Posted November 20, 2009 Lockenfora (sp) etal said Ralph was after an offensive minded coach this time.
jahbonas Posted November 20, 2009 Posted November 20, 2009 I'd prefer to spend the top money on the GM who will guide the football operations and structure the scouting system. If thats in place then selecting a young rising Coordinator would be fine...they key is to choose the right coordinator...do you select a Mularkey? or select a guy like Daniels in Denver? One key point with these "names" coaches. Is anyone else bothered by the fact they may only go where they perceive the situation is perfect so they can protect their own career W-L record?? What happened to having a coach believing they will be the difference maker and can make lemonade out of lemons.... If we had such a perfect situation...then anyone could lead the team to numerous wins....
BuffalOhio Posted November 20, 2009 Posted November 20, 2009 I'd prefer to spend the top money on the GM who will guide the football operations and structure the scouting system.If thats in place then selecting a young rising Coordinator would be fine...they key is to choose the right coordinator...do you select a Mularkey? or select a guy like Daniels in Denver? One key point with these "names" coaches. Is anyone else bothered by the fact they may only go where they perceive the situation is perfect so they can protect their own career W-L record?? What happened to having a coach believing they will be the difference maker and can make lemonade out of lemons.... If we had such a perfect situation...then anyone could lead the team to numerous wins.... Lemonade out of lemons? Sounds pretty easy to me!
quikchomp Posted November 20, 2009 Posted November 20, 2009 The best thing I heard King say was that Shanahan and his choice of DC were spending time this off-season studying the Steelers' 3-4 defense and would bring that wherever they go. The 3-4 is so much better - we just need the big plug in the middle.
LABills08 Posted November 20, 2009 Posted November 20, 2009 The best thing I heard King say was that Shanahan and his choice of DC were spending time this off-season studying the Steelers' 3-4 defense and would bring that wherever they go. The 3-4 is so much better - we just need the big plug in the middle. It was crazy to me how Jauron wanted to run a 4-3 in our division. I agree the 3-4 is much better, but it requires SIZE. You need to have a big nose tackle and linebackers who can really get a push on the O-line. The Bills as a franchise had a lot of success running it back in the day of Ted Cottrell. Biggest reason I think a 3-4 is necessary is so you can move Maybin outside to be a blitzing line backer.
Adam Posted November 20, 2009 Posted November 20, 2009 The best thing I heard King say was that Shanahan and his choice of DC were spending time this off-season studying the Steelers' 3-4 defense and would bring that wherever they go. The 3-4 is so much better - we just need the big plug in the middle. Terrance Cody, DT, Alabama
8-8 Forever? Posted November 20, 2009 Posted November 20, 2009 The best thing I heard King say was that Shanahan and his choice of DC were spending time this off-season studying the Steelers' 3-4 defense and would bring that wherever they go. The 3-4 is so much better - we just need the big plug in the middle. there are 4 big time NT free agents coming out this year...
billsfan72 Posted November 20, 2009 Posted November 20, 2009 Can anybody find out what year they got away from the 3-4, and what the record was since?
benderbender Posted November 20, 2009 Posted November 20, 2009 Has any 3-4 enthusiast figured how Schobel and Denney will fit in 3-4?
quikchomp Posted November 20, 2009 Posted November 20, 2009 Has any 3-4 enthusiast figured how Schobel and Denney will fit in 3-4? OLB, Waiver Wire
benderbender Posted November 20, 2009 Posted November 20, 2009 Unless the plan is to switch Schobel and Denney to LB, we need to pretty much gut the defense. Which I would support since what we had wasnt working.
fansince61 Posted November 20, 2009 Posted November 20, 2009 Has any 3-4 enthusiast figured how Schobel and Denney will fit in 3-4? They wouldn't. Hate to lose their winning tradition... oh wait, they have never won anything.
Brandon Posted November 20, 2009 Posted November 20, 2009 Can anybody find out what year they got away from the 3-4, and what the record was since? I believe the last year for the 3-4 was 2000. If memory serves, Gregg Williams started converting to the 4-3 almost immediately when he was hired in 2001.
BADOLBILZ Posted November 20, 2009 Posted November 20, 2009 - Buffalo is not as unattractive a job as some fans think. Oakland is toxic. Buffalo is not. - Don't get hung up on name coaches. The names fail just as often as they succeed. - Suggested Mike Zimmer from Cinci, a DC with a Parcells pedigree. PTR Names might fail as often as they succeed but I think the success rate for proven winners moving to other teams is still more favorable than first timers. I would want nothing to do with Mike Zimmer, and neither should any Bills fan. The time for experimentation is over. Obviously, everybody wants to catch the young genius on the way up. But the Bills botched both of their recent shots at never before HC's and the non-name retread they just fired was a disaster. After Dave Campo, Dallas didn't keep hiring no-names, the got Parcells and got the organizaton going in the right direction. Sooner or later you have to let your organization get some traction, and while a retread like Shanahan might never recapture his SB winning touch, he would more than likely get the organization back to truly competitive football. Not just an unwatchable, statistically terrible football played conservatively enough to win 7 out of 16 games.
BADOLBILZ Posted November 20, 2009 Posted November 20, 2009 Unless the plan is to switch Schobel and Denney to LB, we need to pretty much gut the defense. Which I would support since what we had wasnt working. Denney is almost a prototypical 3-4 DE. Very large DE.
fan_in_tx Posted November 20, 2009 Posted November 20, 2009 2001 I believe.. The Greg Williams experiment .. Phil Hansen asked why they would change the number 2 defense in the league at the time... I think we know how their record has been since.
Recommended Posts