Thailog80 Posted November 17, 2004 Share Posted November 17, 2004 Bretts first year in ATL Yeah 0-5 with two ints.............Send his ass out of here. He'll never amount to anything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICE Posted November 17, 2004 Share Posted November 17, 2004 You know TDog it may just be me...But doesn't it look like Favre got better with MORE PLAYING TIME? More ON FIELD experience? Now I'm not the smartest guy and all, but damn those stats seem to reflect that idea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thailog80 Posted November 17, 2004 Author Share Posted November 17, 2004 You know TDog it may just be me...But doesn't it look like Favre got better with MORE PLAYING TIME? More ON FIELD experience? Now I'm not the smartest guy and all, but damn those stats seem to reflect that idea. 121656[/snapback] That was the point of my post. JP had a bad outing in NE.....bfd. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Watching ICE Melt Posted November 17, 2004 Share Posted November 17, 2004 You know TDog it may just be me...But doesn't it look like Favre got better with MORE PLAYING TIME? More ON FIELD experience? Now I'm not the smartest guy and all, but damn those stats seem to reflect that idea. 121656[/snapback] First in one thread you say this about JP" The smart thing to do is to sit him " Then here you say this "MORE PLAYING TIME More ON FIELD experience" You're a real piece of work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICE Posted November 17, 2004 Share Posted November 17, 2004 First in one thread you say this about JP" The smart thing to do is to sit him "Then here you say this "MORE PLAYING TIME More ON FIELD experience" You're a real piece of work. 121673[/snapback] NO! My stance is give him every damn rep then let him start against St. Louis. But that won't happen so... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R. Rich Posted November 17, 2004 Share Posted November 17, 2004 Not to go against you T80, but the big difference is that Green Bay OWNS the Packers, so there's no threat of them leaving any time soon. That said, they don't have to worry about playing certain players in order to 'fill up the stands'. The stands are full whether they're 16-0 or 0-16. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nick in* england Posted November 17, 2004 Share Posted November 17, 2004 Not to go against you T80, but the big difference is that Green Bay OWNS the Packers, so there's no threat of them leaving any time soon. That said, they don't have to worry about playing certain players in order to 'fill up the stands'. The stands are full whether they're 16-0 or 0-16. 121717[/snapback] uh... que? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R. Rich Posted November 17, 2004 Share Posted November 17, 2004 uh... que? 121732[/snapback] The reason we keep hearing that a change won't be made is because Bledsoe is making a ton of money and is bringing in the fans, etc. Those weren't issues when Favre got to start in Green Bay. I think if the Bills weren't so concerned with selling tickets and luxury boxes, they'd make decisions based on the personnel, not their salaries. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nick in* england Posted November 17, 2004 Share Posted November 17, 2004 The reason we keep hearing that a change won't be made is because Bledsoe is making a ton of money and is bringing in the fans, etc. Those weren't issues when Favre got to start in Green Bay. I think if the Bills weren't so concerned with selling tickets and luxury boxes, they'd make decisions based on the personnel, not their salaries. 121742[/snapback] oooohhhhh - much clearer... thanks!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts