Jump to content

Someone Please Explain the Palin Hatred!


Recommended Posts

Here you go, you'll enjoy this

 

That's just the cover...I wonder what the centerfold is like

 

 

Palin should thank Newsweek for this one. It's like a recruitment poster for the 18-29 year old MILF lovers vote. :(

 

 

The funny thing is that they were no doubt trying to diminish her with this cover.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 328
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Obama does not strike me as a particularly religious man. I've never once heard him support any of the statements you're referring to. Palin has repeatedly.
Not particularly religious, but he still made frequent trips to Jeremiah Wrights Church

 

She likely believes these things because that is what her church teaches and she does not generally seem to stray too far, if at all.
Your argument is that because her church preaches something - she is likely to believe it. Could your same argument be made about Obama and what Reverend Wright preaches?

 

Either a bad attempt at a joke or you're lack of knowledge of what evolution is all about is slightly troubling.

Bad attempt at a joke. I know it wasn't that great, but you didn't give me very good material to work with :(

 

The 'why I hate Obama' threads can easily be found on the first page of PPP. Please stay on topic.

So when Obama misuses executive resources, it's off topic?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm so glad the level-headed people on the right are here to show us how to give the proper respect for women in politics like Hillary and Pelosi. :(

Hillary is alright with me, I always liked her more than the majority of the Liberals. Pelosi on the other hand :censored:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Someone Please Explain the Palin Hatred!

 

Seriously? She's wholly unqualified to hold public office, and has a horrible grasp of reality. She's disregards information that conflicts with her Christian based ideology as if it's her job (and I think that is her job).

 

 

She's EVERYTHING the left hates.

 

True! She's uneducated, and unqualified. The left does hate that a lot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And this upsets you? I'd think that it would be right up your alley!

 

Good research, Lou.

 

But seriously, that's just me and my posts. David Letterman both referring to Palin as a slut and Palin's daughter getting knocked up by NY Yankee Derek Jeter just proves Democrats have sex on their mind when it comes to Sarah Palin. The joke writers knew exactly what they were looking for when they came up with those lines.

 

"Call me if you need me." Barack Obama (minus his teleprompter, obviously)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seriously? She's wholly unqualified to hold public office, and has a horrible grasp of reality. She's disregards information that conflicts with her Christian based ideology as if it's her job (and I think that is her job).

 

 

 

 

True! She's uneducated, and unqualified. The left does hate that a lot.

 

 

Truly more qualified than the "community organizer" tied closely with ACORN. I'm a conservative and thought that the first George Bush was one of the most qualified persons to ever take office as the President, but was dissappointed in his 4 years in office. What does Obama have to offer?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He was a U.S. Senator, and a Constitutional Law Professor. I know you know this. And I know choose not to mention it, due to the fact that it would shut down your "he's not qualified" argument.

 

My arguments against Palin are not even the job positions she's held. It's the fact that she thought living in Alaska gave her diplomatic experience with Russia. She thought the VP was in charge of the Senate. Gah .. do I really have to point out all of the dumb things she's said. Why do you people choose to ignore the plethora of inane things that woman has done.

 

Even just recently that quote on the coins and conspiracy theory was just hilarious. Even FNC called her out on it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm so glad the level-headed people on the right are here to show us how to give the proper respect for women in politics like Hillary and Pelosi. :oops:

 

Hillary is looking better all the time which is really hard for me to say. Pelosi deserves far worse than she is getting. Even lefties have to look seriously at what she is doing and realize the wreckless spending and government control that she is pushing is disastrous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He was a U.S. Senator, and a Constitutional Law Professor. I know you know this. And I know choose not to mention it, due to the fact that it would shut down your "he's not qualified" argument.

 

My arguments against Palin are not even the job positions she's held. It's the fact that she thought living in Alaska gave her diplomatic experience with Russia. She thought the VP was in charge of the Senate. Gah .. do I really have to point out all of the dumb things she's said. Why do you people choose to ignore the plethora of inane things that woman has done.

 

Even just recently that quote on the coins and conspiracy theory was just hilarious. Even FNC called her out on it.

:oops:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Joe Biden :oops:

I was just going to say...Biden thinks Article 1 of the Consitution defines the role of the Vice President. When it comes to complete and utter stupidity, it amazes me that the left will cherry pick some Palin comments when we have years of Biden idiocy sitting with us.

 

But Conner also firmly and honestly believes that Democrats never lie. So it's not like his input has any value to it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Look what I found on wikipedia regarding Obama:

 

CQ Weekly, a nonpartisan publication, characterized him as a "loyal Democrat" based on analysis of all Senate votes in 2005–2007. The National Journal ranked him as the "most liberal" senator based on an assessment of selected votes during 2007

 

So a "loyal democrat" basically means that he voted along party lines just about every time, and when he didn't vote, he voted present.

 

and here's what he accomplished as a state legislator:

 

He sponsored a law increasing tax credits for low-income workers, negotiated welfare reform, and promoted increased subsidies for childcare.[

 

This explains his ideas of redistribution of wealth

 

and

 

He sponsored and led unanimous, bipartisan passage of legislation to monitor racial profiling by requiring police to record the race of drivers they detained, and legislation making Illinois the first state to mandate videotaping of homicide interrogations

 

This explains why he called the Boston Cops actions "stupid" without even knowing all the details, and this also explains why they are hellbent on going after Cheney and Bush for the waterboarding incident, and why this 9/11 trial is in N.Y

 

 

 

Alot can be learned at looking at peoples past.

 

Ah yes, I remember the days when he campaigned as a centrist, just so that he could win over the votes of the moderates, slowly but surely people are realizing that he isn't any sort of a centrist, he wasn't in the past, and he surely isn't one today.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He was a U.S. Senator, and a Constitutional Law Professor. I know you know this. And I know choose not to mention it, due to the fact that it would shut down your "he's not qualified" argument.

 

My arguments against Palin are not even the job positions she's held. It's the fact that she thought living in Alaska gave her diplomatic experience with Russia. She thought the VP was in charge of the Senate. Gah .. do I really have to point out all of the dumb things she's said. Why do you people choose to ignore the plethora of inane things that woman has done.

 

Even just recently that quote on the coins and conspiracy theory was just hilarious. Even FNC called her out on it.

 

Palin has her limitations and if the left challenged her strictly on the issues, she and the right could handle that. The attacks were personal right out of the gate and have continued. She has a record as a Governor and ran on that.

 

As for Obama, being a professor of anything is hardly a qualification to be a President. Most professors are functionally idiots outside of the classroom. As a professor Obama was held accountable for what? He accomplished what? Once he was elected a US Senator he accomplished what else besides running for President? I'll give him credit for running a great campaign. I'll also give him credit for being very intelligent. Practical experience on which to draw sound conclusions and solutions? He's helpless.

 

I wouldn't want Palin as a President, but those of you on the left, ask yourself honestly a few questions:

 

1. Is Obama the guy you want negotiating a new START agreement with the Russians?

2. Is Obama the guy you want making policy decisions to help our economy?

3. Is Obama's idea of transitioning our country to a single payer health system (his words not mine) what you and this country want and is he supporting what you consider is an excellent solution for health care reform?

4. Does it concern you that he is pushing his agenda for social and economic justice (his words not mine) regardless of the cost and debt that is accumulating for these programs?

5. Did he sign what you would consider a well crafted economic stimulus plan?

6. He wants to develop green energy sources and reduce carbon emissions, do you feel that his adminstration is capable of designing cost effective programs that will allow us to capitalize on both the economic and environmental opportunities this presents?

7. Does Obama and his administration strike you as a confident bunch with the experience and know-how in dealing with the Iraq and Afgan wars?

8. What experience does Obama have that you feel qualifies him to lead on these critical issues?

 

I doubt that anyone (regardless of their political stance) can study these issues and look at the solutions being crafted and then HONESTLY conclude that Obama is the right guy making the right decisions. I have asked a number of libs over the past several months to explain to me why they feel Obama is doing a good job and why his policies are the best for our country. Haven't had a decent answer yet and most of the answers simply point to the failures of Bush. Don't care about Bush any longer. Care what's being done now and what I see is horrible. Frankly, Jauron is doing a better job of coaching the Bills.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Look what I found on wikipedia regarding Obama:

 

CQ Weekly, a nonpartisan publication, characterized him as a "loyal Democrat" based on analysis of all Senate votes in 2005–2007. The National Journal ranked him as the "most liberal" senator based on an assessment of selected votes during 2007

 

So a "loyal democrat" basically means that he voted along party lines just about every time, and when he didn't vote, he voted present.

 

and here's what he accomplished as a state legislator:

 

He sponsored a law increasing tax credits for low-income workers, negotiated welfare reform, and promoted increased subsidies for childcare.[

 

This explains his ideas of redistribution of wealth

 

and

 

He sponsored and led unanimous, bipartisan passage of legislation to monitor racial profiling by requiring police to record the race of drivers they detained, and legislation making Illinois the first state to mandate videotaping of homicide interrogations

 

This explains why he called the Boston Cops actions "stupid" without even knowing all the details, and this also explains why they are hellbent on going after Cheney and Bush for the waterboarding incident, and why this 9/11 trial is in N.Y

 

 

 

Alot can be learned at looking at peoples past.

 

Ah yes, I remember the days when he campaigned as a centrist, just so that he could win over the votes of the moderates, slowly but surely people are realizing that he isn't any sort of a centrist, he wasn't in the past, and he surely isn't one today.

 

Isn't quoting Wikipedia on this board considered an Automatic EPIC FAIL?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He was a U.S. Senator, and a Constitutional Law Professor. I know you know this. And I know choose not to mention it, due to the fact that it would shut down your "he's not qualified" argument.

 

My arguments against Palin are not even the job positions she's held. It's the fact that she thought living in Alaska gave her diplomatic experience with Russia. She thought the VP was in charge of the Senate. Gah .. do I really have to point out all of the dumb things she's said. Why do you people choose to ignore the plethora of inane things that woman has done.

 

Even just recently that quote on the coins and conspiracy theory was just hilarious. Even FNC called her out on it.

 

 

When asked, shortly after he became a Senator, if he was going to run for President in '08 he stated that he wouldn't because he was hardly qualified. Qualifications come from experience and strength of character. Abe Lincoln didn't have a lot of experience but his common sense and strenth of character made him a great President. I see no strength of character along with no pertinent experience in Obama. Sarah Palin at least has some executive experience along with what many of us feel is a strong core of beliefs. Constitutional Law Professor? He stated in the past that our constitution was deeply flawed. He is a fraud and is as close to the Manchurian Candidate as you can get. He wants to fundamentally change this country. I for one don't think that this country needs to be changed into another European like state like he is trying to do.

 

While I'm not a "birther", why won't he prove his naturalized citizenship? Why is his past so well hidden? This President has gone back on more campaign promises than anyone I've ever seen. He is all about politics and the furtherance of his agenda, which happens to be socialistic. I for one think that his election to the Presidency is a horrible step backwards for this country.

 

Say what you might, but Sarah Palin wouldn't pretend that we can borrow our way out of debt. I'm also pretty sure that she wouldn't dither away a decision on sending more troops to the war zone when they are needed to save the lives of our military personnel. Everything he does is political and done to further his agenda, not for the good of this country. He is a heavier version of Carter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Nanker sums it up pretty well, but I also think you can't overlook the fact that most liberals are idiots.

 

They will never, ever see that the intense public hatred they have for anyone on the right catapults that person into a worldwide publicity stratosphere that completely blows away anything that rightie could do on their own. Hate Rush, ratings double. Hate Fox News, ratings blow away MSNBC and CNN combined. Hate Glen Beck, top rated show and FOUR books on the NYT Best Sellers List. Hate Sarah Palin, over a million books in print and on the bestseller list before it's even released, and an exclusive interview on Oprah.

 

The more they make these people popular, the more they hate them, so the more popular they make them, so the more they hate them.

 

It's beyond embarrassing, but they simply can not stop themselves, even when some of them come out and yell "Would you idiots PLEASE stop promoting these people?"

 

Sarah Palin owes here fame and income to the left.

Not completely true. She was Governor of Alaska and doing quite well before the VP nomination.

I understand that is not the same as being the governor of a real state[like Arc-in-saw] or Georgia, but she did tackle the main players in Alaska-the oil company's who have owned this state since the 50's.

 

I think the left hates her because she is everything they are not-someone who knows meat is not manufactured in the restaurant, can do all the things the limousine liberals find incomprehensible-I doubt if your average elected Democrat could wipe their butt without a cell phone and a credit card.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...