Magox Posted November 14, 2009 Posted November 14, 2009 http://biggovernment.com/2009/11/13/acorn-...in-your-pocket/ ACORN SUES TO PUT ITS HANDS BACK IN YOUR POCKET Just imagine this scene: an organization is on trial in at least one state for voter registration fraud, accused of voter registration fraud in more than a dozen states, is accused of being a “criminal enterprise” by a Congressional report, and is exposed in a half-dozen states as aiding a supposed pimp and prostitute to obtain a home under false pretenses and use it for admittedly illegal purposes. And that organization then sues the federal government to restart its flow of our money. It makes me think of that insulting JG Wentworth commercial when people are leaning out windows and shouting, “It’s my money and I need it now!” dumbasses
The Big Cat Posted November 14, 2009 Posted November 14, 2009 http://biggovernment.com/2009/11/13/acorn-...in-your-pocket/ ACORN SUES TO PUT ITS HANDS BACK IN YOUR POCKET Just imagine this scene: an organization is on trial in at least one state for voter registration fraud, accused of voter registration fraud in more than a dozen states, is accused of being a “criminal enterprise” by a Congressional report, and is exposed in a half-dozen states as aiding a supposed pimp and prostitute to obtain a home under false pretenses and use it for admittedly illegal purposes. And that organization then sues the federal government to restart its flow of our money. It makes me think of that insulting JG Wentworth commercial when people are leaning out windows and shouting, “It’s my money and I need it now!” dumbasses Man, if you get this fired up over Acorn taking your money, you must truly hate those a-holes at Haliburton.
Magox Posted November 14, 2009 Author Posted November 14, 2009 Man, if you get this fired up over Acorn taking your money, you must truly hate those a-holes at Haliburton. oh looky, it's another liberal with hurt feelings
The Big Cat Posted November 14, 2009 Posted November 14, 2009 oh looky, it's another liberal with hurt feelings Oh looky another racist !@#$ who can't stay on topic.
Magox Posted November 14, 2009 Author Posted November 14, 2009 Oh looky another racist !@#$ who can't stay on topic. racist? because they are fraudulent and give advice in how to set up underage prostitution homes? you sir are pathetic
The Big Cat Posted November 14, 2009 Posted November 14, 2009 racist? because they are fraudulent and give advice in how to set up underage prostitution homes? you sir, are pathetic Reciprocated name-calling. You sir, are predictable. Way to defend your brokeass bogus biases against Acorn.
Magox Posted November 14, 2009 Author Posted November 14, 2009 Reciprocated name-calling. You sir, are predictable. Way to defend your brokeass bogus biases against Acorn. bogus? : right. So, just like the Ft hood incident, you denied what everyone else knew, and now you are denying that ACORN was involved in illegal activities. you truly are a liberal !@#$tard. I know I get under your skin, and every time I post something your panties tend to get all up in a bunch, but just relax, smoke a spliff, watch an episode of South Park and share with us what life lesson you just learned and then get back to us. Think of it like ' Show and tell' like when you were in school.
The Big Cat Posted November 14, 2009 Posted November 14, 2009 bogus? : right. So, just like the Ft hood incident, you denied what everyone else knew, and now you are denying that ACORN was involved in illegal activities. you truly are a liberal !@#$tard. I know I get under your skin, and every time I post something your panties tend to get all up in a bunch, but just relax, smoke a spliff, watch an episode of South Park and share with us what life lesson you just learned and then get back to us. Think of it like ' Show and tell' like when you were in school. Denying ACORN was involved in illegal activities? Priceless. Aren't they missing you at today's Birther's Rally?
Alaska Darin Posted November 14, 2009 Posted November 14, 2009 Denying ACORN was involved in illegal activities? Priceless. Aren't they missing you at today's Birther's Rally? Is there something wrong with you?
Magox Posted November 14, 2009 Author Posted November 14, 2009 Denying ACORN was involved in illegal activities? Priceless. Aren't they missing you at today's Birther's Rally? So I point out facts, and the best you got is calling me "racist" and a "birther". I'll take that as an admission of "I've got nuthin"
drnykterstein Posted November 14, 2009 Posted November 14, 2009 So I point out facts, and the best you got is calling me "racist" and a "birther". I'll take that as an admission of "I've got nuthin" You point out a hand picked selection of facts that support your preconceived notions. You fail to mention or bring up any facts that would disagree with you. Now. Tell us why you are pissed about money going to Acorn, and not pissed Haliburton taking taxpayer money?
DC Tom Posted November 15, 2009 Posted November 15, 2009 So I point out facts, and the best you got is calling me "racist" and a "birther". I'll take that as an admission of "I've got nuthin" ACORN does have a pretty good point...Congress stripped them of funds as a de facto punishment for wrong-doing, which may very well be a bill of attainder and hence unconstitutional. I suppose the real question is: is it a bill of attainder if Congress takes away what Congress originally granted? I really don't know have an answer to that one.
DC Tom Posted November 15, 2009 Posted November 15, 2009 You point out a hand picked selection of facts that support your preconceived notions. You fail to mention or bring up any facts that would disagree with you. Now. Tell us why you are pissed about money going to Acorn, and not pissed Haliburton taking taxpayer money? They are two different situations. Of course, you are really too much of a moron to understand the difference between "grants" and "payments for services rendered."
Magox Posted November 15, 2009 Author Posted November 15, 2009 ACORN does have a pretty good point...Congress stripped them of funds as a de facto punishment for wrong-doing, which may very well be a bill of attainder and hence unconstitutional. I suppose the real question is: is it a bill of attainder if Congress takes away what Congress originally granted? I really don't know have an answer to that one. Oh, I know they have a "case", but I still found it funny. At the end of the day, their days are numbered from receiving the type of federal funds that they are use to. Even most liberals are smart enough to distance themselves from this corrupt organization. It's been rather enjoyable watching them have their asses handed to them publicly, and the liberals scurrying away from them as if they were the black plague.
Magox Posted November 15, 2009 Author Posted November 15, 2009 They are two different situations. Of course, you are really too much of a moron to understand the difference between "grants" and "payments for services rendered." I didn't even try explaining the difference to the two of them, it is pretty clear that they both have no clue what they are talking about when retard #1 said "Man, if you get this fired up over Acorn taking your money, you must truly hate those a-holes at Haliburton." and retard #2 then says "Tell us why you are pissed about money going to Acorn, and not pissed Haliburton taking taxpayer money?"
IDBillzFan Posted November 15, 2009 Posted November 15, 2009 I didn't even try explaining the difference to the two of them, it is pretty clear that they both have no clue what they are talking about when retard #1 said "Man, if you get this fired up over Acorn taking your money, you must truly hate those a-holes at Haliburton." and retard #2 then says "Tell us why you are pissed about money going to Acorn, and not pissed Haliburton taking taxpayer money?" Alternately, one could suggest that if these guys were THAT pissed about Haliburton, they must be REALLY pissed off about ACORN. But no. That concept ricochets off their noggins like their oxygen-depleted brains are protected by a common sense deflector shield. Idiots.
keepthefaith Posted November 15, 2009 Posted November 15, 2009 Oh looky another racist !@#$ who can't stay on topic. Oh, and bringing up Haliburton is staying on topic?
/dev/null Posted November 15, 2009 Posted November 15, 2009 Oh, and bringing up Haliburton is staying on topic? About as on topic as calling somebody a racist
3rdnlng Posted November 15, 2009 Posted November 15, 2009 Reciprocated name-calling. You sir, are predictable. Way to defend your brokeass bogus biases against Acorn. And you asked me in another thread why I assumed you were liberal? I guess its your whole mountain of work.
Recommended Posts