Tea bag trouble

[Bishop Hedd]

Wait....you mean he isn't associated with ACORN?!?

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/13/e...a_n_357003.html

 

 

He should have sold them to another Florida resident Rush Limbaugh.

[Bishop Hedd]

http://ezharris.com/platform/narcotics.html

[The Poojer]

i think its pretty obvious that this was a complete set-up....just wait until the rest of the details emerge.......

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

http://ezharris.com/platform/narcotics.html

[Magox]

You gave me a great idea for another thread

[StupidNation]

Sure, individual members who do wrong are a great reason to say the movement is screwed up. Why not those who are casting the stone, the same who defend the clowns in the D party, show me where the greater problem is?

 

Of course you won't, principally because you know where the real corruption is.

http://forums.twobillsdrive.com/index.php?...90&hl=drugs

[PastaJoe]

Sure, individual members who do wrong are a great reason to say the movement is screwed up. Why not those who are casting the stone, the same who defend the clowns in the D party, show me where the greater problem is?

 

You mean like the individuals in ACORN.

[Gene Frenkle]

You mean like the individuals in ACORN.

Oh, the ironic hypocrisy!

[3rdnlng]

You mean like the individuals in ACORN.

 

 

Yes

[drnykterstein]

http://www.motherjones.com/media/2009/11/how-speak-tea-bag

[keepthefaith]

http://www.motherjones.com/media/2009/11/how-speak-tea-bag

 

Have you noticed how Democrat elected officials, the media and libs like yourself mock the tea party movement and never address the issues that got the movemet started? Let's take the wreckless spending that is going on in Washington that is a core issue of this movement. Have you yourself heard the issue, looked at the issue and come to your own honest conclusion? If so, care to put that conclusion right here?

 

Do you think that just possibly there is some merit to the concern being expressed? Do you think it might be wise for people to take a serious look at that issue and provide a serious response?

[Magox]

http://www.motherjones.com/media/2009/11/how-speak-tea-bag

Have you guys noticed the links they provide?

 

Conner links "motherjones.com"

R.I links "stumbleupon.com"

Deladork Youtubes everything

and BishopHedd links "playgirl"

 

[3rdnlng]

Have you guys noticed the links they provide?

 

Conner links "motherjones.com"

R.I links "stumbleupon.com"

Deladork Youtubes everything

and BishopHedd links "playgirl"

 

 

 

They support their opinions by linking to obtuse and biased sites.

[Jim in Anchorage]

Have you guys noticed the links they provide?

 

Conner links "motherjones.com"

R.I links "stumbleupon.com"

Deladork Youtubes everything

and BishopHedd links "playgirl"

 

Well look at the lack of original thinking. Apparently writing "tea baggers" rather then "tea party" is the ultimate shutdown.

[3rdnlng]

Well look at the lack of original thinking. Apparently writing "tea baggers" rather then "tea party" is the ultimate shutdown.

 

They are so used to "Tea Bagging".

".

[OCinBuffalo]

Let's see....

 

Tea bagging partiers, the group, stands for:

1. People, who don't get paid, who want limited government

2. People, who don't get paid, who think taxes are too high

3. People, who don't get paid, who want a strict interpretation of the constitution

4. Insert whatever else here

 

and

 

Acorn, the group, stands for:

1. Paid Organizers who started 20+ years ago by inciting welfare recipients to demand more benefits

2. Paid Organizers that, when welfare got essentially disbanded, started demanding the return of welfare

3. Paid Organizers that essentially take federal money and demand more free/low interest stuff for people that haven't earned any of it.

4. Same as above

 

But, yeah, lets put an "=" sign between them since they are merely on different sides of the issues

 

Acorn WAS a Federally funded, and by definition, organized pork-barrel boondoggle whose major protection WAS "you either fund us or we call you a racist" - as evidenced that it has taken literally 10 separate, really bad news stories for Congress to cut their funds(for only the rest of the year ) , whose corrupt practices, all over the country, have been exposed.

 

The Tea Party "movement"? is a self-funded, disorganized group of regular people who have no such "or else" protection - as evidenced by the media and politicians viciously attacking them without provocation, have no corrupt practices, and have been "exposed" as being exactly what I describe here.

 

Yeah, these two groups are exactly the same...but on different sides

 

So, instead of accepting this reality for what it is: there is no comparison between Acorn and Tea Party people, we have posters here trying explain Acorn's entire culture of corruption away by saying "see there's bad individuals on both sides".

 

This is of course retarded.

[3rdnlng]

Let's see....

 

Tea bagging partiers, the group, stands for:

1. People, who don't get paid, who want limited government

2. People, who don't get paid, who think taxes are too high

3. People, who don't get paid, who want a strict interpretation of the constitution

4. Insert whatever else here

 

and

 

Acorn, the group, stands for:

1. Paid Organizers who started 20+ years ago by inciting welfare recipients to demand more benefits

2. Paid Organizers that, when welfare got essentially disbanded, started demanding the return of welfare

3. Paid Organizers that essentially take federal money and demand more free/low interest stuff for people that haven't earned any of it.

4. Same as above

 

But, yeah, lets put an "=" sign between them since they are merely on different sides of the issues

 

Acorn WAS a Federally funded, and by definition, organized pork-barrel boondoggle whose major protection WAS "you either fund us or we call you a racist" - as evidenced that it has taken literally 10 separate, really bad news stories for Congress to cut their funds(for only the rest of the year ) , whose corrupt practices, all over the country, have been exposed.

 

The Tea Party "movement"? is a self-funded, disorganized group of regular people who have no such "or else" protection - as evidenced by the media and politicians viciously attacking them without provocation, have no corrupt practices, and have been "exposed" as being exactly what I describe here.

 

Yeah, these two groups are exactly the same...but on different sides

 

So, instead of accepting this reality for what it is: there is no comparison between Acorn and Tea Party people, we have posters here trying explain Acorn's entire culture of corruption away by saying "see there's bad individuals on both sides".

 

This is of course retarded.

 

 

Yes, on the one hand we have a grassroots movement by people with "flyover state" standards and on the other hand an organization whose members feel that they are enabled---enabled to other people's money!