BillsNYC Posted November 9, 2009 Share Posted November 9, 2009 Let them eat cake! http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/13827 Laura Bush was bad, but Michelle beats her out by $700,000 during a recession. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted November 10, 2009 Share Posted November 10, 2009 Brutal. Just brutal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted November 10, 2009 Share Posted November 10, 2009 Unbelievable. Talk about charlatans of the highest order. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magox Posted November 10, 2009 Share Posted November 10, 2009 Hey, at least she is employing and not "saving" 26 jobs at about $70,000, which is alot better than the $305,000 spent per job "saved" or "created" from the Stimulus, oops my bad the Recovery Act. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BamaBills Posted November 10, 2009 Share Posted November 10, 2009 As reported by a site called CANADA FREE PRESS!!! Key word: Canada *rolls eyes* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted November 10, 2009 Share Posted November 10, 2009 As reported by a site called CANADA FREE PRESS!!! Key word: Canada *rolls eyes* ...from a site called Factcheck.org that a certain lib here linked to repeatedly recently. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RI Bills Fan Posted November 10, 2009 Share Posted November 10, 2009 Ask and ye shall receive... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted November 10, 2009 Share Posted November 10, 2009 The most startling thing to me was the number of staffers serving apparently duplicative functions. I know the First Lady's status requires quite a few public appearances...but you'd think they could leverage other White House resources and manage with fewer than a dozen dedicated staffers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim in Anchorage Posted November 10, 2009 Share Posted November 10, 2009 The list must be incomplete. No one could have those shapely arms without a personal trainer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted November 10, 2009 Share Posted November 10, 2009 The most startling thing to me was the number of staffers serving apparently duplicative functions. IIRC you've worked around the Feds for awhile. How can you still find that startling? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cheeseburger_in_paradise Posted November 10, 2009 Share Posted November 10, 2009 Let them eat cake! http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/13827 Laura Bush was bad, but Michelle beats her out by $700,000 during a recession. Are those house servants, or field servants? Or are they just shovel ready jobs? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blzrul Posted November 10, 2009 Share Posted November 10, 2009 Always check Snopes before you make an ass out of yourself Since most of you won't read it: According to Anita McBride, Laura Bush's Chief of Staff, Laura Bush had between 24-26 sfatters Lady Bird Johnson had 30 Betty Ford had "about" 30. Jackie Kennedy had 40. Yowza. Yawn. Nothing to see here wingnuts. Maybe you ought to B word about the Holiday Tree! Now THAT is really important. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magox Posted November 10, 2009 Share Posted November 10, 2009 Always check Snopes before you make an ass out of yourself Since most of you won't read it: According to Anita McBride, Laura Bush's Chief of Staff, Laura Bush had between 24-26 sfatters Lady Bird Johnson had 30 Betty Ford had "about" 30. Jackie Kennedy had 40. Yowza. Yawn. Nothing to see here wingnuts. Maybe you ought to B word about the Holiday Tree! Now THAT is really important. I wouldn't consider snopes to be accurate Even FactCheck, which I believe is liberally biased, says differently Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pBills Posted November 10, 2009 Share Posted November 10, 2009 Will the microscope of complains ever stop? Dear lord, not the First Lady has to many staffers? The First Lady of the United States!!! Something is wrong with people these days... way to much time and anger. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magox Posted November 10, 2009 Share Posted November 10, 2009 Will the microscope of complains ever stop? Dear lord, not the First Lady has to many staffers? The First Lady of the United States!!! Something is wrong with people these days... way to much time and anger. It is a trivial issue, but a funny one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pBills Posted November 10, 2009 Share Posted November 10, 2009 It is a trivial issue, but a funny one. Funny that people are now complaining about the number of White House staffers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magox Posted November 10, 2009 Share Posted November 10, 2009 Funny that people are now complaining about the number of White House staffers At least she's employing alot of people. That's good Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted November 10, 2009 Share Posted November 10, 2009 Always check Snopes before you make an ass out of yourself Since most of you won't read it: According to Anita McBride, Laura Bush's Chief of Staff, Laura Bush had between 24-26 sfatters Lady Bird Johnson had 30 Betty Ford had "about" 30. Jackie Kennedy had 40. Yowza. Yawn. Nothing to see here wingnuts. Maybe you ought to B word about the Holiday Tree! Now THAT is really important. So wait a minute this somehow makes it ok? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted November 10, 2009 Share Posted November 10, 2009 So wait a minute this somehow makes it ok? Well, what they're not telling you is that the other First Ladies had turnover in their staff and they were at it for a bit more than one year. Frankly, I give First Ladies a pass on this. All of them. Even big boned heavy set ones. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pBills Posted November 11, 2009 Share Posted November 11, 2009 At least she's employing alot of people. That's good HAHAHA that's right!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts