CAVEDAWG Posted November 2, 2009 Posted November 2, 2009 I think we should just cut T.O. and let James Hardy start getting some more experience. There is no way he is gonna be resigned by the Bills next year. He really isn't making any big contibutions....experiment....a failure but was it worth the try and his currant salary...I think not!! Any thoughts?
bills_red Posted November 2, 2009 Posted November 2, 2009 If the FO had balls they do that. To bad they don't. Also Hardy might not be ready yet.
Max997 Posted November 2, 2009 Posted November 2, 2009 as we know with his coaches Ralph does not like to pay people that no longer work for him and with TO's guaranteed contract there is no chance TO gets cut Ralph would rather keep someone around then have to pay them when they dont work for him anymore
PearlHowardman Posted November 2, 2009 Posted November 2, 2009 You're correct! The reason why the Buffalo Bills are 3-5 is because James Hardy isn't starting. We are 3-5 NOT because we have a cheap owner who will NEVER pay for good coaches and players. A few personnel changes and we go from the bottom of the AFC East to the TOP of the AFC East - and we STAY there for at least three years! YEAH! BIG PICTURE fans are completely STUPID! <sarcasm>
CAVEDAWG Posted November 2, 2009 Author Posted November 2, 2009 as we know with his coaches Ralph does not like to pay people that no longer work for him and with TO's guaranteed contract there is no chance TO gets cut Ralph would rather keep someone around then have to pay them when they dont work for him anymore Thats why he won't dump DJ!!!
CAVEDAWG Posted November 2, 2009 Author Posted November 2, 2009 You're correct! The reason why the Buffalo Bills are 3-5 is because James Hardy isn't starting. We are 3-5 NOT because we have a cheap owner who will NEVER pay for good coaches and players. A few personnel changes and we go from the bottom of the AFC East to the TOP of the AFC East - and we STAY there for at least three years! YEAH! BIG PICTURE fans are completely STUPID! <sarcasm> Sorry to upset you Pearl...I know that won't fix anything but lets get the kid some more experience....we are not gonna even make the playoffs!
dreadlox Posted November 2, 2009 Posted November 2, 2009 as we know with his coaches Ralph does not like to pay people that no longer work for him and with TO's guaranteed contract there is no chance TO gets cut Ralph would rather keep someone around then have to pay them when they dont work for him anymore While i agree with you, ralph is going to have to pay both of them anyway. let's hope some of the youngsters get to see the field!!
Nuncha Posted November 2, 2009 Posted November 2, 2009 I think we should just cut T.O. and let James Hardy start getting some more experience. There is no way he is gonna be resigned by the Bills next year. He really isn't making any big contibutions....experiment....a failure but was it worth the try and his currant salary...I think not!! Any thoughts? James Hardy = ANOTHER WASTED DRAFT PICK.
CAVEDAWG Posted November 2, 2009 Author Posted November 2, 2009 James Hardy = ANOTHER WASTED DRAFT PICK. I think it's too soon to determine that yet. It usually takes receivers a couple of years to get the hang of it!
Red Posted November 2, 2009 Posted November 2, 2009 I think we should just cut T.O. and let James Hardy start getting some more experience. There is no way he is gonna be resigned by the Bills next year. He really isn't making any big contibutions....experiment....a failure but was it worth the try and his currant salary...I think not!! Any thoughts? You know, besides the now obvious dastardly intentions of one Mr. Donahoe, I truly do not believe that anyone in the Bills front office, nor the owner, are truly evil. However, with that being said, though evil they may not be, misguided they truly are. Case in point: signing TO served a two-fold purpose. 1.) Hardy was coming off an injury, and is only a second year player still trying to find his rhythm. Thus, TO provides Hardy the cushion to learn and develop on the shelf, so that when TO's contract expires, Hardy would have absorbed all of his knowledge in a sponge-like fashion and 2.) TO helps sell seats in Toronto. I think the intent of this idea was well founded. However, by allowing the offensive line to flounder, and TO playing true to form and leading the league in dropped passes, it was not the best decision. I want Hardy to start getting on the field. He is another high round draft pick of the Modrak/ Guy regime that has found trouble finding the field.
CAVEDAWG Posted November 2, 2009 Author Posted November 2, 2009 You know, besides the now obvious dastardly intentions of one Mr. Donahoe, I truly do not believe that anyone in the Bills front office, nor the owner, are truly evil. However, with that being said, though evil they may not be, misguided they truly are. Case in point: signing TO served a two-fold purpose. 1.) Hardy was coming off an injury, and is only a second year player still trying to find his rhythm. Thus, TO provides Hardy the cushion to learn and develop on the shelf, so that when TO's contract expires, Hardy would have absorbed all of his knowledge in a sponge-like fashion and 2.) TO helps sell seats in Toronto. I think the intent of this idea was well founded. However, by allowing the offensive line to flounder, and TO playing true to form and leading the league in dropped passes, it was not the best decision. I want Hardy to start getting on the field. He is another high round draft pick of the Modrak/ Guy regime that has found trouble finding the field. Ditto I think you hit it on the head! Good response! Thank you!
High Mark Posted November 2, 2009 Posted November 2, 2009 I think we should just cut T.O. and let James Hardy start getting some more experience. There is no way he is gonna be resigned by the Bills next year. He really isn't making any big contibutions....experiment....a failure but was it worth the try and his currant salary...I think not!! Any thoughts? They already sold the tickets, so why not?
manbeast Posted November 2, 2009 Posted November 2, 2009 I think it's too soon to determine that yet. It usually takes receivers a couple of years to get the hang of it! Agreed.
Recommended Posts