Search the Community

"Here are my principal conclusions. Attorney General Barr has deliberately misrepresented Mueller's report. Number two, President Trump has engaged in impeachable -- impeachable conduct. Number three, partisanship has eroded our system of checks and balances. Number four, few members of Congress have read the Mueller report." A libertarian member of the House Freedom Caucus joins many Democrats in calling out this lawless president https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2019/05/19/kevin_mccarthy_justin_amash_impeachment_call_is_disturbing_but_he_is_a_lightweight.html

Nany says... Game ON!

"Days of Silence" = invoke 25th amendment? Someone should impeach Maxine Waters.

Impeach

Ever wonder why Adam Schitt is so concerned about educating everyone about deep fakes? If true, please release them *WHILE* he is speaking on Tuesday at the impeachment trial.

They’re talking impeachment, a-gain, because they think this is a war with Iran.

https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2025/06/24/congress/most-democrats-vote-to-kill-impeachment-measure-00421254 Most House Democrats joined with Republicans on Tuesday to quash an effort to impeach President Donald Trump over his weekend Iran strikes. Rep. Al Green’s impeachment resolution was tabled on a 344-79 vote, with 128 Democrats joining all 216 Republicans to kill the measure. Those included House Democratic leaders, who have been wary of pursuing new impeachments after two prior Trump impeachments failed during his first term. Still, dozens of Democrats voted to keep Green’s resolution alive. Green introduced the measure lambasting Trump for striking Iran without congressional approval Tuesday and used a fast-track process to force a quick vote. GOP leaders moved first with the motion to table. Some Democrats — most prominently New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez — called for Trump’s impeachment in the aftermath of the strike, though there’s little appetite in the rest of the caucus for impeachment. Michigan Rep. Shri Thanedar yanked a prior impeachment measure he sponsored last month before it even came up for a vote after facing fierce blowback in the caucus. Lets go crybabies. Looks like crazy isn't so hot anymore.

"I Want Him Impeached Now": Former Trump Supporters Are Revealing Exactly When They Changed Their Minds https://www.buzzfeed.com/meganeliscomb/former-trump-supporters?utm_source=flipboard&utm_content=user/Buzzfeed

The now beyond any doubt Russia hoax and sham Mueller investigation. The subsequent sham impeachment. The unprecedented lawfare attempting to bankrupt and imprison him. Two assassination attempts. The ongoing judicial insurrection against the executive branch. But don't you dare even try to suggest that these very same people just might rig an election. No way. 😂

Lefty idiots: TRUMP IS SCArING INNOCENT PEOPLE! IMPEACH!!

Interesting post given the thread topic. Are we supposed to be outraged because she was denied the additional 8-12hrs to diarrhea out her hairbrained take on the situation? Really? Old gal is feigning outrage over the timeliness of disclosure when we all know she'd rather they never caught the scumbag at all lol. A whole night deprived of rage farming on the Twitter machine, poor jo..we must impeach!

Your side continued to prosecute and persecute a candidate after spying on him and setting up a phony path to impeachment based on lies and fake sources created by old foreign intelligence agents. Then tried to kill him. But I digress.

I’ll wait on Roundy to get the SK data. Which I’ll assume is basically “the other party was impeached and removed from office.” But the trends are global:

If the Dems take back power in the midterms, don’t act shocked when Trump gets impeached again. The guy collects impeachments like felony charges and let’s be real, he’s earned every damn one.

Funny how James Comer and Jim Jordan vanish the moment an actual case for impeachment shows up.

Ignore and impeach. Alito wrote: "...district courts should not view today’s decision as an invitation to certify nationwide classes without scrupulous adherence to the rigors of Rule 23. Otherwise, the universal injunction will return from the grave under the guise of 'nationwide class relief,' and today’s decision will be of little more than minor academic interest."

Musk Calls for Trump’s Impeachment and Implies He Is a Pedophile https://flip.it/H_yahf Tesla shares tumble as Trump-Musk feud erupts https://flip.it/3GAvJd There goes that stupid *****en theory you had. Poor poor Elon.

Did these go to bed with each other after this cozy dinner Trump is 100% itching for the impeachments to start.

He won after Yeol’s martial law debacle, impeachment, insurrection trial, and subsequent removal from office. What a stunner here. New guy also supports Bitcoin. “Liberal” in South Korea isn’t the same as the West. So, my 2 cents….

The bottom line on this is it's not a partisan issue. Both parties are cowards for not being more forthcoming with the Epstein information. If there is proof that Trump molested young girls, he needs to be impeached and sent to jail. If there is proof that Clinton molested young girls, his Presidential Library needs to be tore down and he needs to go to jail. If there is proof Bush, Obama, and Biden all covered up those activities they also need to be thrown in jail . If there is no concrete evidence of any of the above happening the media outlets reporting it should be sued and discredited.

If Obama had accepted that jet from Quatar, republicans would have gone ape s@#t bonkers and claimed it as proof he is a traitor and not American. They would demand impeachment. Trump does it and his flock of sheep are silent.

Back to the thread Please read. Re: The Department of War This is not some simple publicity stunt. Starting back in the 80s with Goldwater-Nichols and then carrying over into the "interagency" fetish post-9/11, our military became more interested in how it could look and act like the State Department then in how it could eradicate our enemies in the most violent and expeditious manner possible. Nowhere was this more evident than the first impeachment of President Trump thanks to Lieutenant Colonel Alexander “Chow Thief” Vindman. If you recall, Vindman initiated an impeachment of his Commander-in-Chief because he disagreed with the President’s lawful authority over foreign policy. More specifically, there was an “interagency” consensus that Trump allegedly ignored, so this dumpy, midwit lieutenant colonel decided he knew best and in the process tore our nation apart. However, Vindman was and is a mere symptom of far more metastasized cancer. A cancer where the leaders of our uniformed services forgot who and what they are. They are not diplomats. They are not civil service employees of some federal department. They are not politicians. They are WARRIORS—or at least they are supposed to be. Their singular purpose is to close with and destroy our nation’s enemies. The “Department of War” is a necessary and vital symbolic move that recaptures the heart of the warrior. It tells our own nation and our adversaries this: No more Vindmans. No more Milleys. No more McChrystals. No more idiotic rules of engagement that serve only to kill young American troops. No more disgraceful retreats from the Taliban. No more nation-building. No more bringing “democracy” to 8th Century tribal goons. Nope. Now when we fight, we kill and we destroy and we win and we come home. THAT IS WAR. That’s why the “Department of War” is so very, very important. .

It was too depressing to write this last night, after we got off air, so I went to bed. But, it needs to be said by more Democrats: this was not an impeachable offense, and Trump did not need congressional approval for one precision attack under the circumstances, just as Obama did not when striking Bin Laden. Why can’t our Party just say it’s great we achieved the objective and destroyed Iran’s nuclear sites, god bless the soldiers who carried this out and made it home safely, god bless our country, military, allies, and we look forward to a full intel briefing. . If one must then assert Congressional authority at the moment, add that any escalation will require congressional approval. And if you must, express concern for where this may go and what might come next. But, for so many in my Party to knee jerk with unhinged calls for impeachment - and sadly omit in their statement support for Iran not having nuclear weapons, which has been a principle of our Party for 40 years -is truly TDS.

Who knew? Article II, Section 2, Clause 1: The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States; he may require the Opinion, in writing, of the principal Officer in each of the executive Departments, upon any Subject relating to the Duties of their respective Offices, and he shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offences against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment. Got that? Grant Reprieves and Pardons. Not "sign documents with quill pen and ink bottle rendering pardons unto his relatives ..."

'It’s already in the cards': Trump impeachment urged by WSJ editorial board member https://flip.it/r06wyq