Search the Community

For my fellow emo kids: MCR is doing a short tour called Long Live The Black Parade (follow up to their festival headline this year I assume, where they played The Black Parade in its entirety) in a few stadiums https://www.mychemicalromance.com/longlive

Heritage black Americans should receive the same treatment and benefits as heritage whites under the law. That figure includes zero Haitians.

I'm just giving you the data. In London in particular, despite making up only 13% of London’s total population, blacks account for 61% of knife murder perpetrators and 53% of knife crime perpetrators. Speaking of Jamaica, black Caribbeans have a higher crime rate than black Africans. But black Africans still are at a higher rate than the national average. Why is it racist to suggest a racial basis for an attack committed on whites by blacks, but it's your sworn civic duty to suggest a racial basis (hate crime!) when a white attacks a black (rare indeed relatively speaking)?

Oklahoma parole board members include: Mental health counselor Episcopal (that is, apostate from Christianity) "Bishop" Criminal defense attorney Social worker lol, lmao The lefty worship of black murderers would be funny if it wasn't civilizational suicide.

And yet the “chavs” rank well behind blacks in knife crime per capita. Curious.

White leftists almost invariably have the same view on the blacks as scumbags have on their pit bulls: beloved pets who never do anything wrong unless provoked by a “systemic” narrative that cuts against them. White “conservatives” have a similar view but just express it in different ways, like the constant demonization of “white women” as the reason why Biden was elected. It is demonstrably false but it’s the only regime-approved way to attack the left’s rainbow coalition.

I can’t really speak to Trump’s genealogy, but ethnic Germans can be seen as cousins of sorts to the ethnic Americans in general. They assimilate just fine and have intermarried quite a lot with the old American stock. Again, ignorance of the history of the early laws of this country with respect to immigration especially is no friend. I’ve spoken to the heritage black Americans already in this very thread. If you can’t be bothered to read just say so and have done with it.

Someone recently responded to a reply I posted in the thread about Murderin' Marcellus, expressing disbelief and consternation at the notion that the concept of "anti-racism" is essentially a set of lies. While I am unsurprised that this particular board member embraces the aforementioned concept, I thought it would be useful for those who might find themselves aligned with conservative values of various stripes to understand what is actually meant by the term, and why opposing it is good and right. Whenever we critically approach what leftists claim is obvious or reasonable (when in fact it is neither), it is important to understand how the term was generated (that is, its genealogy, so to speak) and how it has been framed. Conservatives are generally bad at recognizing leftist framing and have readily adopted quite a bit of leftist language into their talking points, which concedes at least some portion of the leftist worldview. For a primer on framing, you can go here, but the tl;dr is that certain concepts or words have been designed through their construction and/or through priming to elicit an emotional response. In this case, you have been primed to believe that "racism" is wrong and evil (in fact, you may have heard that it's America's first and greatest sin). Therefore, you have been primed to believe that anything that is against racism must be right and good. The naming of the leftist concepts discussed below as "anti-racism" (aka "against racism") is thus a frame job designed to elicit positive emotions before you even know what the term actually means. To demolish the leftist frame and address the ideas hiding underneath them, you must trace the idea back to its source, consider the source, and consider whether adopting the idea has resulted in our country, or your life, being better or worse as a result. "Anti-" is just a prefix, so we first should examine the genealogy of the term "racism" and how it entered western consciousness, then focus on how once the people were thoroughly primed to recoil at even the mention of "racism," "anti-racist" was adopted by leftist agitators as a frame for their ideas that you would unwittingly accept simply because it's anti- that emotion you felt at the mention of "racism." The term "racism" is much younger than you probably think. First instance of the term in English is from the early 20th century, but both the common usage and modern understanding of racism began in the 1930s with the translation from German of Magnus Hirschfeld's book titled Racism. First, considering the source: Magnus Hirschfeld was a 19th/20th century jewish "sexologist" who (in)famously founded the "Institute of Sexual Research" in Weimar-era Berlin. This so-called institute facilitated the first "sex change" surgeries in Europe and helped drive the depravity of Weimar Berlin. For those not in the know Luigi Barzini describes that time like this: In short, like every other "pioneer" of modern gender or sexual theory, Hirschfeld is tied through his own words and works to some combination of genital mutilation and/or pedophilia. How many ideas of his should we really be adopting? It is worth noting further that though Hirschfeld's work was essentially the genesis of the modern understanding of the term "racism," its usage is fairly small until, big surprise here, the mid-1960s, when known communist agitators who worked tirelessly to begin the transformation of the United States from a proper nation to a failed state experienced their highest concentration of major successes (you can see the ngram here). Then came the add-ons: now there's structural racism, institutional racism, internalized racism, etc. all of which consist almost entirely (at first in academic circles, now in the mainstream) of circularly reasoned blood libel against Whites. In fact, research shows that Whites in America have the lowest in-group preference of any racial group. White animus toward a racial group simply as a result of their race as a problem, if it ever actually was a problem, fizzled out long ago. Black animus towards Whites, on the other hand, is quite a different story, as the interracial murder stats tell us year after year. Which brings us back to "anti-racism." Wikipedia will attempt to tell you that the roots of it go back to the 17th Century, though that is impossible given that words have meanings and the term "racism" hadn't even been invented yet. Mainstream sources will also gloss over the direct statements of those who actually theorize around anti-racism, instead priming you to believe that it simply is the reasonable response to the made-up sins of the various racisms. The term anti-racist was actually coined by the Black Panther Party (Leninist by admission) during the aforementioned 1960s, whose stated demands included that zero black people should ever be held responsible for crimes they may commit. Anti-racism for Whites includes the idea that Whites "must acknowledge and understand their privilege" (blood libel) and recognize that our entire society is, in fact, "White supremacist." It also includes the idea that any system, test, or other objective measure that has unequal racial outcomes (that is, that blacks do poorly in) is by definition racist (evil!!!). Therefore anytime Whites do well, it's due to racism, it's Whitey's fault, etc. meanwhile black underperformance can never be the fault of blacks (remember, crime stats are racist, IQ tests are racist, the SATs are racist, etc.). The system that "anti-racists" wish to design is one in which Whites have no authority, but all of the responsibility. Which is a succinct definition of slavery. Is this what we should want for our children? In other words, stop calling leftists "the real racists." Instead you should reject, categorically, terms imported by communists that your ancestors did just fine without. And laugh at them when they call you names invented their intellectual heroes (sodomites who liked to chop off genitals and ***** little boys).

I don’t mind black people. I think they have a right to their ancestral home. Which is more than you can say for whites.

Meanwhile there are multi million dollar nonprofits set up just to get blacks off of death row on technicalities. They know they're guilty but they do it anyway. This guy was stopped by highwaymen and exercised his self-defense rights long held to be unassailable by every common law nation on the planet.

Just like leftists (black and tranny worship), “conservatives” have their own purity test in the US.

Blacks don’t have a right or claim on those folks’ resources. There is no “right” to share a city with Whites. The first quarter of this year Baton Rouge tracked a homicide rate of 68 per 100,000 adjusted for a full year. Much higher than most banana republics and third world nations run by street gangs. Would you want the children of these maniacs in the same halls and classrooms as your kids?

Crypto apologists really don’t get it. The government can very easily seize or freeze your digital assets. And then there’s the whole matter of getting your black market currency accepted in exchange for goods or services. Or better yet, getting the tax man to accept it. And I do trade for some of my meat and produce. I’ll be fine. I just wonder if all these bitheads have really thought this thing through.

The Piper at the Gates of Dawn - hot take alert, anything after this wasn’t really Pink Floyd Born in the USA - don’t think I’ll get any arguments here …And Justice for All - all that momentum and good will barreling into the 90s and Metallica takes advantage by doing their own version of Dylan going electric. No thanks. Metallica has four albums in my timeline. But in real life they became superstars off the back of the black album so I guess I don’t blame them.

Because banning guns will help the government* keep us safe!!! *Same government that perpetuated the following: Tuskegee Experiments Operation Paperclip Operation Northwoods Operation Mockingbird Gulf of Tonkin MKUltra Project Artichoke Subproject 68 Kent State COINTELPRO Iran Contra BCCI Chicago Black Sites Iraq “Incubator Babies” Ruby Ridge Waco Missing Trillions from the Pentagon Before 9/11 Abu Ghraib NSA Spying NDAA Operation Fast & Furious

Yeah anyone who has bothered to read up on the matter knows that America as our fathers dreamed of it died in Dallas some sixty years ago. I hesitated to post ITT at first because I’ve barely been alive thirty years but in this age of information it’s hard to believe that anybody can take at face value the official stories of watergate and JFK’s murder (along with several other events in recent history). But here we are, with a Zyn addict trust fund baby blowing people’s minds by simply repeating barely-hidden facts on a network known better for the busty blondes than the journalism. The real crux of the whole thing is this: That’s the deep state. GS-15s or whatever with TS:SCI clearances who run, with zero effective oversight, some of the biggest and most powerful government agencies on earth. It’s not particularly insidious on its face, as the Q types would have you believe, it’s just that the most schoolmarmish, neurotic, and dorkish individuals tend to occupy these seats because those are the no-chested types who flourish in bureaucracies that refuse to reward true valiant striving. But since these all-grown-up theater kids now have some power with none of the requisite character to use it correctly, they wield it over their physical and spiritual betters like a headsman’s axe. Even after the democrats actually stole the election in 1960, Nixon showed that he had more character and good nature in his pinky finger than all the shot callers in the justice department combined. And his reward was to become a black smear in every “history” book that graces a classroom in this country. JFK wanted transparency and accountability from his government, and his reward was to have pieces of his skull splattered on the pavement of Dealey Plaza. And we wonder why new-to-the-game politicians talk a big game right up until they actually get where they want to go. I imagine the presidents-elect less familiar with DC inside baseball (see Clinton, William and Obama, Barack) tend to get a pretty hefty explanation of the carrot and stick that await them should they play ball or try to blow it up, respectively. Sorry for the longpoast this ***** bothers me.

I would bet that NFL players are more religious than the general population. American blacks are more likely to be religious than the general population and obviously the NFL has more black people, by percentage, than the general population.

Accountability? lol there is none. This is what you have to look forward to. Complete negligence in infrastructure, medicine, the judiciary, piloting (!) and untold numbers of other areas where Americans will be unable to hold anyone accountable while the regime is more interested in filling diversity quotas than they are in competent management of these industries. They’d rather have more black lesbians flying planes than have fewer planes crash. That’s it. That’s where your accountability is.

Nobody here is ready for the conversation about the Black Muslims. The lore runs deep.

What’s interesting is that the media is more concerned with a member of the royal family (which had a black person in it before) possibly being racist than a member of the royal family definitely being a pedophile. But I suppose that’s a feature, not a bug.

What is causing Fields to drop down draft charts and why is it racism? https://web.archive.org/web/20210426170952if_/https://theundefeated.com/features/justin-fields-and-the-double-standard-of-black-quarterback-prospects-nfl-draft/

lmao yeah the Proud Boys started a riot in response to a clean shoot of a black dude. Give us a *****in break dude

Like I said, a lot of it has to do with the (black) market for cars. Don't seem to be as popular now. Used to be Customs would crack open crates with stolen Q7s on their way to Israel or Eastern Europe pretty regularly. It's like most crime, most of it is opportunity. Locking your car, just like locking your house, is usually an effective deterrent by itself. ETA: I know with the Q7s windows would sometimes get smashed and they would use a computer that hooked into the OBD connecter to program a generic fob. I haven't kept up because they trended down but it's possible Audi managed to increase security on the car's computer.

It's the same strategy as 1/6 - "Sicknick killed by insurrectionists" or Rittenhouse "killed black people." They know that the emotional impact of the initial (false) story is what will stick with most normal people.

And again the question needs to be asked: our laws and Constitution are set down in black and white, forever inscribed into our nation's founding documents as well as acts of Congress. Why, then, does "diversity" enter into the equation? Why does any group need "representation" in the reading and interpreting of laws?