BuffaloBaumer

I am most interested to see if Parrish could be utilized properly.....and produce

Yes and yes....exactly

Hey, all I'm sayin' is that IF this team has 1-3 wins, it won't be such a bad thing. That record will clearly indicate that there is currently not one QB on this team who took control of the job. This would also mean that there is a good chance Locker, Mallet or Luck could be had. Like I also said, if Edwards, Brohm or Brown turns the team around...great. Either way, I won't mind the outcome....

It is time to finally admit we are in rebuild mode and this team will continue to do so until they get a QB that can take them where we all want them to go. These 6-8 win seasons have never let us get the QB we need so I really would like to be in a position to grab one next year. Every SB contender has at least ONE playmaker and the Bills lack that of offense and D.

What do you think I am talking about. This team has not won in over ten years. Winning 6-8 games every year is LOSING in my book.....

That's exactly why I wouldn't mind a top 5 pick with the QBs in 2011......

That Jets loss in OT was BRUTAL. The home opener is the one I really care about so last year was good

Don't forget about winning the opener - best day of the year......

I have absolutely ZERO problem winning one game (I'll take the opener because that day should never be tainted) this year if it looks like the team can hang with most of their competition (especially the AFC East). Re-building is fine and I would much rather prefer getting a top level QB in next year's draft than missing out going 5-11. Ideally, I would love to see the line get in sync for 2011 when the real future of this team is waiting for us in that draft. Hopefully QB will be the only glaring need once this year is over. Figure out the rest of the team until that happens and if Brohm, Edwards or Jones miraculously saves us, so be it......

Let the league fall apart and I'll be fine with the Sabres. The NFL is becoming more and more of a turn off every single year.......

I would keep him too if I was Newsome. They are not paying him that much, he'll play RG for a year and then leave. Oh well, it sounded like it could have worked last week.

Seriously, that was one of their dumber moves all season. He was not coming back here for 2010, playoffs were gone and there were two younger receivers they could have got a jump start on (Hardy and Johnson). Dumb, dumb and dumber over there last year.....

Someone keep Willis away from Gaither until this deal is signed.......

I hope it never happens so I would never have to have the debate. I'll wait for the real one....

This is totally fine with me. As long as they don't bring in replacement fans to spearhead the tailgates, bring it on....

THank goodness that it is Brohm V Edwards right now. I don't see any redeeming qualities about Fitz as a starter. For some reason, I think one of these two guys is going to surprise.......

I would MUCH rather have Edwards over Fitz and I am HOPING that Brohm miraculously becomes something I don't think he is.... Any way you slice it, I am willing to GUARANTEE the QB in week 1 will not be the same as week 17 and that has nothing to do with injuries.....

The sooner you people realize that this team is re-building, the better off you'll be. This should have been done YEARS ago but nobody had a clue how to do it. This team is NOT making the playoffs this year so all you can hope for is gradual improvement. Anything that turns out better than what is written above and you will be pleasantly surprised. I mean come on, did you see this offense last year? We still have no idea what QB and LT are going to look like....

Trade Roy (since some teams may actually want him), lose Stafford and either Lydman or Hank - then you get yourself a true #1 Center and move Connolly to where he belongs (2nd line) Done and done.....

I think the biggest goal is to make sure that by this time next year, those are filled without creating more holes elsewhere. 2012 is where I predict Buffalo to make their first playoff and that is if and only if one of the 3 QBs on the roster steps up or their replacement is finally drafted next year. I like the draft they just had and it would be fantastic if this QB situation actually worked itself out with someone on the team right now. Not having a clue as to what Brohm is all about, I am thinking he is the only chance they have.

Sooooo where again does it say he is keeping Lynch??????

Playmakers are not such a bad thing to have on an offense that has struggled so mightily for so long. Yes, the oline helps change that but so does a game changing player. Spiller will help our QB (whoever it is) just as much as drafting the 4th best LT (if not more). They had two LTs graded as a top ten pick and they were not there. I am even more interested as to who they will pick with their 2nd pick as they should be able to get a pretty decent NT or lineman. This team needs an identity SO BADLY and hopefully that is exactly what is being built right now. Trade Lynch, get another pick, and let's see how it plays out.....

Dan Williams or whoever they have ranked highest at LB/DE- book it

Jets have plenty of time to win the Super Bowl...their QB will be in year 2. Let's just find A qb first.......

I'll take their roster AND their uniforms without hesitation....