3rdnlng

Looks like Mayor Garcetti's visitor bureau has outdone itself.

No more boy lattes for you. Who do you think you are, Section8?

But, but, but where's the diversity?

What enclosed space is going to hold the 300,000+ amount of people for the rally?

Compare uses of the bully pulpit used by Trump regarding funding for The Wall vs. Obama for pandemic precautions. If a president wants funding for something that is reasonable and important to him/her they can get it done.

Easy guy, I'll send out my Federal Reserves to put them down. If that doesn't work I'll defund my guys and they'll really kick ass. It seems pretty simple to me. Either the NYC police budget is bloated and should be cut with no risk to the population or the powers to be are willing to sacrifice life and limb for......................................................................what?

The BS about Trump getting rid of all of the pandemic fighting people in his administration is ludicrous. Obama vastly expanded the NSA and in some instances a bunch of people labeled as pandemic fighters got jobs. What Obama wanted to do with these people is unknown but they had jobs that were duplicated elsewhere. This has been discussed here before but partisan TDS idiots like BillSlime want to bring it back up because when you don't have facts to back up your position, the same old lies will have to suffice. Back in 2014 Obama addressed a future problem with a speech and then didn't do a damn thing about it.

I'm well aware of all of this and wonder why you didn't post this instead of partial stats? Regardless, ballot harvesting coincides nicely with the changing demographics and open border push.

Overcrowding is a problem in many precincts but only the republicans want to do something about it. Gotta hand it to those democrats though, they sure know how to keep things orderly.

Did I defund you enough? Have you thought about signing up for automatic defunding?

That's the problem and no I'm not taking a shot at you. It is important to use precise language so that there is no confusion when discussing an issue. Using words according to your personal definition doesn't bring about any coming together or better understanding but contributes to confusion and misunderstanding. If one wants to qualify "defund" then use adjectives along with it such as "partially", "temporarily", "momentarily" or "somewhat". I know the adjectives wouldn't look good on a protest sign, but just saying "defund the police" is sending a message that not only isn't what the sign holder wants to convey, but makes the people you want to convince immediately oppose.

So, socialism=social security? You're better than that, Doc. Your comments immediately reminded me of Tiberius and The Federal Reserve "confusion". Do you really want to be associated with that?

That's it, you're now defunded.

Nice statistics. Quote 2019 stats for use in 2018 and then only use partial stats for the rest. Do you actually think that ballot harvesting is a good thing and the SoCal dems have no nefarious motives for promoting it?

It appears that Biden does not have the stamina to run a campaign that touches on all bases.

Stop it! Shut up. This is supposed to be a forum consisting of 90% racist deplorables and 10% pure as the driven snow liberals. There will be no talk of sole food here.

They could not take the chance of warning Page of their duplicity. After all, information was altered to reflect that he had not worked with the CIA and in affect became an open target for the coup conspirators.

He's an attention *****. He pulled the sameshit a year ago and said he'd go away for good if anyone could guess what his big secret was. I did and he even admitted I was right. He promptly changed his name and continued to post as someone else who liked to call people ball lickers and suggest that he would "do" any wives or girlfriends of posters here. His agenda isn't to fight racism, it's to cause havoc. That's his CRUSADE.

Once again, 3rd Chair is begging for a cork screw.

Seems like an accomplished cork soaker/sniffer like you would find it no matter how short it was.

Why are you guys arguing with a pissant who claims victim hood as his mantra? All this guy is is a perfect example of a failure, loser so to speak. He's left here before because he couldn't take the pressure so he came back and sucked many of you into arguing with his made up, most recent agenda. He makes this forum worse because of his fake crusade, but nevertheless, it is a CRUSADE.

Your best post yet.

I got to thinking here regarding racism. What would the OP do if he couldn't claim victim hood? He needs to find his own version of racism in order to perpetuate that victim hood. His outrageous claims are meant to bring out fighting words from other posters so that he can once again, claim victim hood. He's made these claims in any and every thread he could get his hands on. This seems like a classic case of CRUSADING.

What treaties did Trump discard? Did the deficit increase because the income went down or the spending increased?

China showing what a piker Russia is.