3rdnlng

WTF PEOPLE, JUST LIKE IN THE RUSSIAN COLLUSION CASE THERE IS NOTHING ILLEGAL ABOUT COLLUSION ALONE. A PERSON WOULD HAVE TO DO SOMETHING ILLEGAL IN CONJUNCTION WITH SOMEONE ELSE FOR IT TO BE ILLEGAL.THERE IS NOTHING INHERENTLY ILLEGAL ABOUT QUID PRO QUO EITHER. IF YOU BOUGHT GASOLINE TODAY YOU WERE INVOLVED IN A QUID PRO QUO. SAME WITH LUNCH. IF YOU BOUGHT A BJ THEN YOU WERE INVOLVED IN AN ILLEGAL QUID PRO QUO.

To save Columbus's statue from Antifa, supporters plastered it with Job Applications.

You idiot, you quoted two of my posts that were merged. For not thinking about me you sure like to seek me out here and respond.

Crayola's resume includes once sitting as 3rd Chair in an actual courtroom and another time filing a motion that he won. I make fun of you but in reality you are probably more qualified to sit on Burisma's board than Hunter Biden ever was. I'll always first think of you as 3rd Chair but now I can also always think of you as that guy who was more qualified than Hunter Biden. He must be for "free stuff".

Doral doesn't need free publicity. It is already well known. It is large enough to be a venue where everyone can stay there if they choose or get away to other attractions. 12 sites were considered and 8 were eliminated for good cause before the final selection was made.

Did you get permission from 2nd Chair for this post?

Yes, and Hunter did all he could to assuage the grief of his sister-in-law.

What law is Trump breaking? The law against quid pro quo, commonly known as the "no barter law"?

No answer, eh?

Since when is a quid pro quo illegal or even wrong? Life is full of quid pro quos. If I ask you to kill someone for me and offer you money for doing so, that is a quid pro quo and is illegal and wrong. If I give you a dollar for a candy bar, that is a perfectly good quid pro quo. Foreign policy decisions are nothing but a quid pro quo. This administration had concerns that Ukraine was corrupt and would not cooperate with AG Barr and his investigation into the 2016 election including Crowdstrike. They could have made the loan guarantees subject to conditions around that investigation and there would be nothing wrong with doing so. They didn't even bother to do that. Those of you idiots trying to make something more of that phone call just highlight the fact that you have nothing other than trumped up accusations.

You speakum English not so good but why would that have changed since the last visit to your superiors?

Nothing better than a dove with an AR-15 over his shoulder and two 45 automatics on his hips. That's so 1970's ish. Guess what? We don't need their stinkin' oil.

Your ad lib lines are well rehearsed.

Are you ever going to be original?

I did that with a sailboat------once.

Ah, Gary making his usual contribution.

What? As if Eric hasn't already been proven to be the feds Inner Seaways Idiot of the Year? You are a clown.

It would be interesting to see how well those protestors stayed on the train when it was up to full speed and then stopped suddenly.

The OP, someone called @Tiberius, made a claim that there is bi-partisan support for impeachment. Where's the proof?

The federal government is going to give a Trump property a facelift to make it presentable? I guess there's not enough American deaths to give HAHA Gator a good laugh so he has to come up with something so ridiculous.

Where is this bi-partisan support for impeachment?

The problem that the Republicans have is that they have never been able to just fall in line. They have different opinions and aren't willing to let those opinions slide just for the sake of party unity. The Democrats on the other hand, march lock-step with party leadership (The Squad aside) and would follow party leadership off a cliff if lead there. The Republicans will never succumb to the lure of the lemming leaders, but will unite behind dynamic leadership while simultaneously objecting when they see fit. It's like Republicans are The Marlboro Man while Democrats seek out Virginia Slims.

Just what is the issue at hand?

After the Resistance shoots their mouths off for awhile he'll have other proposals leaked to show that Doral was the best deal.

Ah, a teacher who can't/won't learn. How many times do you have to be told that if you make claims, you are the person who needs to back up those claims. I don't need to back them up for you. Why is this so hard for you to understand? When it comes to you it's like Groundhog Day all over again.