bladiebla

The key is the DB is NOT looking at the ball, had he been looking at the ball he may have gotten away with it.

For all the doubters click here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ebUidLNoR-E#t=03m46

1) Legit, no question about it. See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ebUidLNoR-E#t=03m36 for a good angle on it. Direct link that starts at PI: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ebUidLNoR-E#t=03m36 2) Fitz allready had his knee down so play over, then fumbled and recovered. So was it a fumble; no. Replay showed that one very clearly too.

Says it all!

Bengals have really struggled on third down conversions, hopefully we can keep it that way but if they suddenly start converting they may turn out to be a pretty dangerous team.

Might want to edit the thread title or start a new thread, I think your question is getting lost due to the title of the thread.

Strangely enough this article says differently: "Tailgating Experts Say Baltimore is America’s Best Football Tailgating City, Followed by Denver, Houston, San Diego and Cincinnati" Pretty awesome though that Lee Evans the Dad choose to go to Buffalo over St. Louis (prolly helped the son didnt play). "For Ravens games, the main lot next to the stadium is sold out in advance. There are plenty of options nearby, however; the closest ones are at Sharp and Ostend Streets at the southeast corner of the stadium. There are two lots there, one under a bridge and a small one across the street. You may also want to try the lots along Warner Street south of the stadium. Parking typically runs $20-25; some lots may be less. Most lots claim they don't open until four hours before game time; you can get in earlier than that at most of them and pay the attendant later." A good party can be found here: http://www.examiner.com/budget-nightlife-in-baltimore/best-place-to-tailgate-for-ravens-games-mothers-federal-hill Self proclaimed best lot on facebook: http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=192706924197 That's about all I get from google... No clear answers, might be a good one to take to a Ravens bb.

Jets going to be dangerous against us, those games will prove if Gaileys variant is better then that of the Pats*; on paper with the running game mixed in it; it is... Time will tell I guess.

We need McGee back for week 17 simple as that, we have no-one else who is able to cover Welker, at least McGee will limit Welker to 100 yards...

I dont know, how do you handle it? Quarter and dime packages? That would leave room for the run... Turnovers and force incompletions but that is kinda always the key to winning...

Chan said it best, "now it's time to proof we can handle prosperity as well"

2 road wins?

It is an important game but for a different reason then stated, the team has shown how to handle being an underdog, play through to the last second no matter what and shown they dont stop giving all untill the final whistle. Now is the time to see if they can handle being the favorite and still bring the focus to take out the underdog (Bengals).

Wow, that just seems a bit over the top...

Thank you Dan, exactly my point, longest resonse I ever typed on my iPhone only to post it and see that you posted exactly the same lol. This win was real and in no way gifted, if anything not going for or getting the ints in the raiders game was one of the focus points of the db group this week. Gailey repeatedly stated throughout the week that he wanted the DBS to play the ball aggressively and not just cove/ tackle.

Can you Pats* fans please go and watch the boomer recap posted here. It has the best camera angle on the PI, Nelson made the cutback move and was grabbed. THAT drew the penalty, the cb then followed up with the wrapping jam in which Nelson engaged. Never did the cb look at the ball, had the Cb played it clean Nelson would have fought for the ball at the very least. Also note that a 5 minute every angle, lots of slomo analysis on ESPN Boston confirmed the call as being totally legit. Was the call convient? Sure was, but did it ever cross your minds that play could have been a cut and drop back which could have been spot on? In all honesty the safety would prolly have made the int but it would have been a fight for the ball for sure. Bottomline is we will never know because the Pats cb panicked and caused a very clear PI. You want to B word about a botched call, B word about the Byrd tackle call against Welker, that was a pure rubbish call that cost us 7.

That WASNOT a bloody gift, it was very much legit, need proof watch the bloody vid posted by the op, no interference there and he would have been where Fitz threw it. If he would have caught it is a different discussion but that was a PI as clear as they come.

The chopblock call on Wood was legit; the block itself wasnt so much an issue as it was that Rhineart was engaged with that player and then chopblocks arent allowed. The foul on Byrd was a blown call for sure, Byrd could not have played that any different. Also refs had some dodgy placements of the ball all in favor of the Pats*. The PI call was face guarding and totally legit, stupid play by the Pats*.

With regards to the Eagles, they got so many free agents that they are suffering from the lockout, wouldnt surprise me to see them become a super team second half of the season.

Then explain the slow starts... I think Chan and his coaches are good at making in game adjustments but not so good at prepping.

LOL *KAPOW*

We're 3-0, beat the Pats* and are leading the division. HAH hows that for reality!

Signed

YESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS

Wow, I feel like im in the twilight zone!