playman

left from brandt´s top 100 http://blogs.nfl.com/2010/04/23/whos-left-...randts-hot-100/ any but CB id be happy with ^^ id love campbell. he may not be ready, but im pretty sure he will be.

if the price is right....

just saw the replay here. amazing facial expression

y trade up? just sit and wait for him to fall to us in rd 7 XD

maybe even bruce campbell. as long as its a big guy ^^

blocking? hell be out on a route every single time. and turn the 1.5 sec checkdown pass into a 85 yd TD

i like the pick. not really loving it as id have liked a trade-down, but my guess is the raiders ruined that with their pick. otot, taking all of 3 minutes to grab spiller might tell hes who they wanted anyways. what i DO love is that they acted to their words. no reach for need, taking BPA, looking for playmakers and so on. and given spillers statue they very well accomplished 2 goals with 1 pick. adding a playmaker AND a waterbug ^^ now i just hope they go big in 2 - 4. wouldnt be disappointed with colt though

love the 2nd article

they are if the player they want is still there

drew brees.

this 40 times really mean nothing. gholston ran pretty fast, huh? when one can play, he can play. period. so if spikes falls b/c of that, id be all to happy

id rather have a bidding war between SF and seatlle so we can trade again with the giants ^^

read somewhere on espn that the ravens might want to get a RB. lynch was mentioned. scroll down to the veteran trades part http://espn.go.com/blog/afcwest/post/_/id/...uestions-remain swap for gaither?

a 4.5 40 isnt exactly slow imo

absolutely a trade everyone would love to happen.. and a fair one too. that would be a bunch of picks

id say no. keep the pick. you may get an OLB whos able to start day 1. he may be better than anyone we have now. he may be not. whatever, i think its best to beef up, both O and D. even to our last 7th rounder.

well, he cant. 1st hit hell be out 4 the season

drew brees anyone?

likely. because i cant find him on nfl.com

what about " agree to be traded " ?

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2010/writ...ebow/index.html

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2010/writ...ebow/index.html makes one think. read it up.....

just looked at some mocks and most of them have okung go to the skins at 4. most agree that hes the best, some say only, LT in the draft. now my question. what would we have to give up to swap with washington? if its a 3rd id go for it. 2nd im not so sure about.

wade runs his 3-4 with a smallosh - kind of - NT. mostly a 1-gap-scheme. you dont absolutely need a 2-gapper at NT. only if you run it that way

maybe theyve decided that o-line is far more important atm, and that they take care of QB next year?