playman

if its a trade it better includes next years 1 from the partner

the term " blunt " comes to mind

http://rivals.yahoo.com/ncaa/football/news?slug=ap-florida-jenkins 2 posessions of weed. no big deal imo. played hurt and well against top competition. id do it. thoughts?

Bills have no intrest in Newton at 3 (the 1 year wonder is not buddys type) Bill have no intrest in Gabbert at 3 ( gabbert is going to be a bust - trent #two, checkdown charlie) the bills are talking qb and thinking Von Miller, if he is gone they will look to trade back if not Da'Quan Bowers is the man and they are in love with Colin kapernick with the second pick

i like it, mkay?

from MMQB: According to the chart, the third overall pick is worth 2,200 points. The value of the Pats' three top picks: 17 (950), 28 (660), 33 (580). Total value of the three picks: 2,190. and this. same article: Now, the chart is not gospel. Teams don't have to use it. But it just shows you how valuable the third overall pick is, and it's highly unlikely the Bills would take much of a discount, if any, for dealing that choice, particularly if it meant giving a division rival a franchise player for the next 10 years. Read more: http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2011/writers/peter_king/04/24/mmqb/index.html#ixzz1Ke2a3iBS so, if thats the offer, and maybe even thrown in a 10 point pick, id do it.

not true. ive quit smoking. and ive smoked for over 30 years.

absolutely

du hast ja gesagt

id prefer an OT if someone with talent drops to us in the 2nd. doubtful though

kapernick goes 1st overall

http://www.fannation.com/truth_and_rumors/view/277330-favre-to-return-as-newtons-tutor?eref=fromSI&eref=fromSI

spot on

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/draft06/news/story?id=2410670

id try hard to hit on the 1st for a change

maybe he has given up?

went mathews-romeus-brewer. but i still think it has to be OT with our 2nd. maybe no one worth that still there though

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2011/writers/peter_king/03/29/andy-dalton-mail/index.html just to add

in that order. though " doesn`t want to " may comes at 1

with dareus gone ill take that. if hes still there ill take him. and matthews will be gone by rd 3 on name alone

build inside-out. trade for as many picks you can get. wishful thinking.

i just hope your thoughts are wrong. b/c i would like them to FINALLY go inside-out when building a team. drafting dareaus would give me some hope. but history shows you might be right.......

if he really is that lazy id stay away with our 2nd pick. id run to the podium with our 3rd though. maybe a chip on his shoulders b/c teams are passing on him gets him going ^^

we need some luck at QB. so give me dareus

id support that ^^