grinreaper

http://observer.com/2016/09/emailgate-and-the-mystery-of-the-missing-gamma/ Last week’s Federal Bureau of Investigation release of materials relating to their investigation of Hillary Clinton has reignited the political firestorm surrounding EmailGate. How the Democratic nominee mishandled her emails while she was secretary of state is again front-page news, which is bad news for Hillary. Particularly because the FBI’s data dump demonstrates clearly that Clinton is either dumb or dishonest—and perhaps both. Although Team Clinton has responded in their customary fashion, with lawyerly lies and evasions—nothing was “marked” classified, this is really about over-classification, classification is too complex for anybody to understand anyway—the FBI’s assessment has thoroughly debunked all of them. Hillary’s professed inability to even recognize classified information, thinking the “C” (for Confidential) meant alphabetical order, will now enter the pantheon of laughable Clinton infamy, alongside her husband’s debating the meaning of “is” while under oath. The Bureau’s assessment establishes once and for all that there was classified information—and lots of it—on Hillary’s email server and bunches of Blackberries, many of which she lost. In fact, the FBI concluded that roughly 2,000 of her “unclassified” emails included information that was Confidential, the lowest level of classification. The FBI examined 81 Clinton email chains, determining that they included classified information relating to the CIA, the FBI, the Pentagon, NSA, and the National Geospatial Intelligence Agency or NGA. In other words, Hillary compromised classified materials representing the full range of American espionage: human intelligence or HUMINT from CIA, signals intelligence or SIGINT from NSA, and imagery intelligence or IMINT from NGA. Of those 81 classified email chains, the FBI assessed that 37 of them included Secret information while eight included Top Secret information. Worse, seven email chains included Special Access Program or SAP information, which is tightly protected by the Intelligence Community and shared on a restricted, need-to-know basis only. Three more email chains contained Sensitive Compartmented Information or SCI, which was almost certainly SIGINT from NSA. SCI always requires special protection and handling. In fact, you’re only allowed to access it inside a specially-built Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility, a SCIF (pronounced “skiff”) in spy-speak. Any exposure of SCI brings severe penalties—at least if you’re not named Clinton.

http://www.thecollegefix.com/post/28906/ ‘A safe space for Black CSLA students …’ California State University Los Angeles recently rolled out segregated housing for black students. The arrangement comes roughly nine months after the university’s Black Student Union issued a set of demands in response to what its members contend are frequent “racist attacks” on campus, such as “racially insensitive remarks” and “microaggressions” by professors and students. One demand was for a “CSLA housing space delegated for Black students.”

Look in the mirror for the creeps.

This is in English and in the UK, for those of you who are obtuse: http://www.wnd.com/2015/02/no-go-zones-census-data-shows-100-in-britain/ There are more than 100 “Muslim enclaves” in the United Kingdom that are “de facto off limits to non-Muslims due to a number of factors, including the lawlessness, insecurity or religious intimidation that often pervades these areas,” according to a new report. The report cites the nation’s own census data. “An erroneous claim on American television that Birmingham, England, is ‘totally Muslim’ and off-limits to non-Muslims has ignited a political charged debate about the existence of no-go zones in Britain and other European countries,” wrote Soeren Kern, a senior fellow at the New York-based Gatestone Institute, in a report about Muslim “no-go” zones. Kern said that in some no-go zones, “host-country authorities are unable or unwilling to provide even basic public aid, such as police, fire fighting and ambulance services, out of fear of being attacked by Muslim gangs that sometimes claim control over such areas.” And they are “breeding grounds for Islamic radicalism.” Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2015/02/no-go-zones-census-data-shows-100-in-britain/#KX2yL8wJPvbp6uUQ.99

This just in France: http://www.barenakedislam.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/France-Seeks-to-Reclaim-No-Go-Zones.jpg

https://youtu.be/oI08BKgT8MI HAHA!

It's just a faster "69".

http://conservativenews247.com/article/view/305010/Flashback-Bill-Clinton-Said-in-1995-What-Trump-Says-Today-on-Immigration/ While former President Bill Clinton's 1995 speech on illegal immigration got a standing ovation when he used the same talking points as Republican nominee Donald Trump, Trump's Arizona speech Wednesday got him called a racist. Clinton gave a State of the Union address where he said all Americans were disturbed by the number of illegal immigrants in the country. He noted the burdens they put on the taxpayers before vowing to crack down aggressively. "That's why our administration has moved to aggressively secure our borders more, by hiring a record number of new border guards, by deporting twice as many criminal aliens as ever before, by cracking down on illegal hiring, by barring welfare benefits to illegal aliens," Clinton said. Clinton received a standing ovation for his remarks. WATCH: Trump's speech in Arizona had many of the same talking points as Clinton's speech. Trump pointed out that the immigration system is failing and that leadership needs to listen to the concerns of the American people. He vowed, much like Clinton did, to strengthen the border, hire more border security and to deport any criminal illegal immigrants. "We will issue detainers for all illegal immigrants who are arrested for any crime whatsoever, and they will be placed into immediate removal proceedings," Trump said. Trump addressed welfare abuse, using the same talking points as Clinton did. "The Center for Immigration Studies estimates that 62 percent of households headed by illegal immigrants used some form of cash or non-cash welfare programs, like food stamps or housing assistance," Trump continued. "Those who abuse our welfare system will be priorities for removal." After Trump's speech, the media ran headlines referring to his speech as "vile" and "hate-filled." NBC News ran an article where various Latinos called his speech "fear-mongering" and labeled Trump a racist.

BTW lyrbob, just what is your expertise in the real estate and mortgage fields? Last I knew you posted what looked like some plagiarism but in the end of your post you slipped up and confused assessment with appraisal, showing that you were too dumb to write the part you plagiarized. I really have to hand it to you Sherlock, you successfully guessed my real identity. I just knew I shouldn't have kept the same avatar! Maybe so, but if you go back a few pages you will see much conversation about voter fraud and since there were so many people from TSW here, I thought it would be nice to preach to someone other than the choir.

http://writeinron2012.com/writeinBlog/2012/11/13/election-fraud-confirmed-in-ohios-cuyahoga-county-machine-rigging-places-obama-into-presidency/ In a heavily publicized two candidate race it is virtually impossible for one candidate to score 100% of the votes in large precincts, especially in major metropolitan areas. Perhaps it might occur in a few small- to medium-sized precincts, but virtually never in large precincts of over 300 voters. Moreover, could this really occur in dozens of precincts in single major cities? This is precisely what happened in numerous Ohio and Pennsylvania precincts. Are people are to believe that this happened in some 20 precincts in Cuyahoga County alone? Yet, in this county Barack Obama achieved more than 99% of the vote in over 100 different precincts, districts where out of hundreds of votes Romney received only one or two votes. A similar trend occurred in Philadelphia. Both these trends must be investigated. These numerical aberrations raise the suspicion of electronic vote rigging. Regardless, there were numerous reports of Romney votes being registered for Obama throughout the state. This means that an Obama presidency was pre-determined, while Romney—or any other Republican nominee–would be cheated out of the presidency. In Cleveland-area Cuyahoga County Barack Obama received 100% of the votes in 20 precincts, amounting to 5978 votes versus zero for Romney. Yes, zero. There were 2 votes for Gary Johnson also ‘recorded’ in those precincts, while none for any others. As first reported by Before It’s News’ Michael Snyder in 25 other Cleveland-area precincts Obama received over 99% of the vote, with Romney scoring in each case only one vote. That, too, is impossible. Now, wouldn’t it be expected that in all those precincts there would be at least one person in supposedly Obama-loving Cleveland that was not part of the norm, that was disenfranchised by the Obama regime, sick of the horrid economy, tired and frustrated with the corruption. Is Cleveland really that abnormal? In particular, in write-in friendly Philly it would be expected that here, too, 99%-plus voting would never occur, considering the disenfranchisement of the people; surely, there would be write-in votes for Ron Paul and/or electronic ones for Romney that amounted to more than 1%. One thing that was abnormal was how the voting machines responded to attempted Romney votes. Noted Marion, Ohio, voter, Joan Stevens, every time she tried to vote for Romney on her touchscreen machine Obama’s name would register. After the fourth attempt, finally, Romney’s name appeared. Noted Stevens: “I don’t know if it happened to anybody else or not, but this is the first time in all the years that we voted that this has ever happened to me,” said Marion, Ohio, voter Joan Stevens. Voter fraud is real.

He drives an old Prius.

Congratulations on becoming a person who thinks for themselves. As mentioned earlier in this thread, the right is composed of many different political beliefs. We often disagree but generally speaking we back up our arguments with at least a semblance of reason. Not so with the majority on the left. They pretty much march in unison with the their leaders and are virtually impossible to debate with since their beliefs are cast in stone.

I'll take your expert opinion on it.

baskin-baskin-baskin-baskin-baskin-baskin-baskin-baskin.

You didn't make it clear what you were trying to say. I politely asked for clarification and you got all smart ass with me. You need to find a different strain of weed, one that doesn't enhance your assmudgeonry.

In actuality you are not worth my time. You've been a petulant little pissant since I called you out in the lead up to the Trayvon Martin death trial. You've been pissed at me for making you look foolish but what you've never been able to come to grips with is that you yourself made you look foolish. My OP in this thread was meant to show how stupid and hypocritical the supposed higher levels of education were being. I gave you a chance to clarify your response to my OP but again you decided to go the foolish route, aka the Ryan Route.

I wasn't asking you. Instead of a cryptic response to a legitimate question that was designed to figure out what Ryan was asking, why don't you practice what you preach and try to be more like Little Marco than Lying Ted?

Who are you directing this at?

http://www.gopusa.com/?p=14056?omhide=true Hampshire College will offer some of its students what the school euphemistically calls “identity-based housing.” That’s segregated housing for students who — because of their race, culture, gender or sexual orientation — have “historically experienced oppression.” I’d bet the rent money that Hampshire College will not offer Jewish, Irish, Polish, Chinese or Catholic students segregated housing. Because there is no group of people who have not faced oppression, Hampshire College is guilty of religious and ethnic discrimination in its housing segregation policy. University of Connecticut administrators think that more black men will graduate if they spend more time together. According to Campus Reform, they are building a new residence hall to facilitate just that. Dr. Erik Hines, the faculty director for the program, said that the learning community “is a space for African-American men to … come together and validate their experiences that they may have on campus. … It’s also a space where they can have conversation and also talk with individuals who come from the same background who share the same experience.” By the way, Hampshire College and the University of Connecticut are not alone in promoting racially segregated student housing. Then there’s an effort for racial segregation in classes. Moraine Valley Community College attempted it in a class titled “College: Changes, Challenges, Choices.” It mandated that some class sections be “limited to African-American students.” The college defended racially segregated classes by saying that they make students “feel comfortable.” After facing massive national notoriety, the college just recently abandoned its racial segregation agenda.

I'm not running from anything, you simpleton. You should try a different strain of weed. This one just lets your natural assmudgeonry tendencies spring to the forefront.

Seems to be rather important to you.

If you're going to talk that schit you should just go back to Belfast.

Since the question was asked, I'm for more guns.

I came here to post this very link, but you beat me to it. From your link: At least 85 of 154 people from private interests who met or had phone conversations scheduled with Clinton while she led the State Department donated to her family charity or pledged commitments to its international programs, according to a review of State Department calendars released so far to The Associated Press. Combined, the 85 donors contributed as much as $156 million. At least 40 donated more than $100,000 each, and 20 gave more than $1 million............ The 154 did not include U.S. federal employees or foreign government representatives. Clinton met with representatives of at least 16 foreign governments that donated as much as $170 million to the Clinton charity, but they were not included in AP's calculations because such meetings would presumably have been part of her diplomatic duties............ Those planned changes would not affect more than 6,000 donors who have already provided the Clinton charity with more than $2 billion in funding since its creation in 2000.............. We're not talking just pocket change here.

I think Papa Bush was very well qualified to be President: WW2 fighter pilot. Yale graduate Successful businessman 2 term congressman CIA Director Amb. to U.N Amb. to China 2 term VP http://www.biography.com/people/george-hw-bush-38066#related-video-gallery