grinreaper

What, was HRC texting her dick pics?

I'm confused. Did someone yell out "Hillary"?

"Know" or "no"?

Instead of lamb basting you guys for not having the mental wear with all to keep up with 4mer's explanations, I just shake my head in disbelief.

Chewy likes "spinners"?

Obama makes a claim that he asked for republican input in the ACA back in 2009. http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/video/obama-to-republicans-if-it-works-im-for-it/vi-BBxYM3r?ocid=HPCOMMDHP15

https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=youtube+joe+biden+the+villages&view=detail&mid=BFBD1F772647A9395D8FBFBD1F772647A9395D8F&FORM=VIRE

That would be my preference too but we are talking about a guy that is blaming yesteryears happenings on the congress that just got sworn in. We are all dumber for his presence here.

This is a private enterprise. He has no assmudgeonry rights here.

Schitforbrains responds in kind to a post from Jan 27 2016 lamenting how bad things are and then blames it on the congress sworn in this week. Why is he even allowed to post here?

She died in 1994.

For what it's worth: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/21/opinion/21kristof.html It’s true that religion is the essential reason conservatives give more, and religious liberals are as generous as religious conservatives. Among the stingiest of the stingy are secular conservatives. According to Google’s figures, if donations to all religious organizations are excluded, liberals give slightly more to charity than conservatives do. But Mr. Brooks says that if measuring by the percentage of income given, conservatives are more generous than liberals even to secular causes. In any case, if conservative donations often end up building extravagant churches, liberal donations frequently sustain art museums, symphonies, schools and universities that cater to the well-off. (It’s great to support the arts and education, but they’re not the same as charity for the needy. And some research suggests that donations to education actually increase inequality because they go mostly to elite institutions attended by the wealthy.) Advertisement Continue reading the main story Conservatives also appear to be more generous than liberals in nonfinancial ways. People in red states are considerably more likely to volunteer for good causes, and conservatives give blood more often. If liberals and moderates gave blood as often as conservatives, Mr. Brooks said, the American blood supply would increase by 45 percent.

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/blacks-arrested-in-colorado-at-three-times-the-population-rate/ar-BBxtd3Y?li=BBnb4R7&ocid=HPCOMMDHP15 Is it prejudice or just because they commit more crimes and more serious crimes? "The study found that while African-Americans were arrested at three times their proportion of the population, Latinos made up 23.3 percent of arrestees and whites 61.8 percent. In the state's district courts, blacks were sentenced to prison 24.9 percent of the time, compared with 16.9 percent of Latinos and 17.7 percent of whites. Latinos comprise 22.2 percent of Colorado's 5.4 million residents, while non-Hispanic whites make up 69.1 percent, according to the state demographer's office. The arrests and citations involving blacks were also more frequently for serious offenses such as assault, aggravated assault, homicide, robbery and weapons-related offenses, the report said."

Horseshit. You posted unadulterated crap from dubious sources and then when you were called out, you backpedaled and are trying to change the subject. I rather politely pointed out to you what you needed to do to be a respected poster here. You continued your assmudgeonry showing that even if you are capable of being a good poster, you have no desire to be one.

I know I may be accused of channeling my inner "Sue" but understand that the following is rhetorical: If someone gets a lengthy time out here for a certain activity and then when he returns he continues that same activity, shouldn't further repercussions occur? Isn't a "vacation" meant to change someone's actions? Just sayin.

No. Understand what I'm trying to tell you. Don't post schit that doesn't have a reputable source. More importantly though, think it through first.

https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=joe+biden+drunken+song&view=detail&mid=EED9318CCDF862598D6AEED9318CCDF862598D6A&FORM=VIRE This is what you get when you combine those two.

I'm "harping" on this because you said this, "He's already pressuring foreign leaders to stay at his hotel" and are now trying to back away from it. Don't be that guy that buys into what Infowars or Huffpost spew and then have to retract it. Again, think before you post.

How do you get TV Land without cable?

They must have been turned away at the Canadian border, eh?

This is what you said: "I don't. He's already pressuring foreign leaders to stay at his hotel, I'm sure that's for the public and not to put more money into his pocket." Think before you post.

Read that over again and see how inherently wrong that statement is. If you search to find something to confirm your bias you will most likely find it, but it will be from "sources" such as Salon and Think/Progress. Do you actually think that Trump spent tens of millions of his own money and put himself through the grind of a presidential race in order to up the occupancy rate of his D.C. hotel? Think before you post.

It's Cheeze-its, not cheese it's. That's three errors in trying to spell your one gotta have after partaking. Those grammatical errors are also a siren call to Ben Franklin that is more powerful than a call out to Pasta Joe by quietly crooning Hillary's name. Dude, what's wrong with you?

Salon & Think/Progress? No wonder you think the way you do.

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/trump-blames-terrorists-for-killings-in-turkey-germany/ar-BBxlzsB?li=BBnb7Kz&ocid=HPCOMMDHP15 Without backing up his claim, President-elect Donald Trump is blaming Islamic terrorism for deadly violence in Turkey and Germany and vowing anew to eradicate their regional and global networks. Authorities in both countries were still investigating Monday when Trump issued a pair of statements condemning the incidents. The White House had already described the episode in central Berlin, in which a truck rammed into shoppers at a Christmas market, as an apparent terrorist attack. Trump called the brazen shooting of Russia's ambassador to Turkey as he attended a photo exhibit "a violation of all rules of civilized order." He added that a "radical Islamic terrorist" had assassinated the diplomat, Andrei Karlov. Turkish authorities identified the gunman as Mevlut Mert Altintas, a member of Ankara's riot police squad, and said he was later killed in a shootout with police. Altintas shouted in Turkish about the Syrian city of Aleppo and also yelled "Allahu akbar," the Arabic phrase for "God is great." Could the AP be any more disingenuous?