grinreaper

Are there any other kind?

Wrong thread. Try the Electoral College one where Boyst is spreading his seed around like a 14 year old boy with a Playboy.

A true gentleman would have at least pm'd him and maybe he would have got that message before DR, that Grimreaper, axed him.

24 hrs? Hell, it took you over 2 days to respond to him.

Here something to help you get down off your soapbox.

I knew I should have voted for Meathead.

Why did he want Obama to be a one term president? With a country so fractured it was best to let the next president choose the nominee. Trump would not have won without an opening on the Court.

And cheap too!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elena_Kagan_Supreme_Court_nomination https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sonia_Sotomayor_Supreme_Court_nomination Please take note of the vote counts.

You'll have to ask them. Did the R's filibuster to prevent a vote for these nominees?

The R's allowed Obama to have his honeymoon and didn't fight him just to fight him, but objected to his actual agenda. His Supreme Court nominees were approved with a bipartisan vote. Look at what the Dems are doing with Gorsuch and tell me the Dems have one ounce of integrity.

The problem is Ryan could reintroduce Obamacare and call it something else and the Dems would call it horrific. Their complete obtuseness is disgusting.

Fortunately that doesn't include you. Don't you realize that you tried to bring substantive conversation into a formal, structured debate contest and did so by not reading the whole thread which might have allowed you to understand what was going on? You truly need to get off your soapbox and quit being the real asswhole here.

I thought that was Boyst.

Did you hear that woooshing sound? That was this thread going right over your head.

Every single one of those points are either a gigantic stretch or just flat out wrong.

On the surface, I like it.

Yes I agree. No joining the argument like Meathead, but Joe Miner's comment was entirely appropriate and probably true.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/imam-sermon-montreal-mosque-1.4037397 Levine said this is the second complaint against a Montreal-area mosque filed with the Montreal police's hate crime unit in just over 40 days. He said the police are still investigating that first instance but says they are not taking action soon enough. "This is totally unacceptable. We want to know why the hate crimes unit has not done something to date yet. This person should be arrested and charged for hate crimes," said Levine. CIJA Quebec, an organization that advocates for the Jewish community, said it has a close relationship with the Montreal police and has been following the two complaints. "We know the Montreal police are seriously and diligently investigating these sermons," said David Ouellette, deputy director for CIJA Quebec. He added the group believes the police are close to completing their investigation of the first complaint.

Au contraire. While it isn't fair to join the debate we bystanders have every right to make smarmy and/or snarky comments and ridicule the contestants. This is still PPP, you know.

The Freedom Caucus will be behind it and Speaker Ryan and the mainstream republicans will support it along with some democrats. The Senate has too many democrat Senators up for reelection in red states to not help vote tax cuts in. The important provision will have to do with corporate tax rates. Getting them down is key to all the rest of Trump's agenda.

It may be complicated but the Republican party will be united and there will be some Dems who will cross over.

You still can't comprehend what I have posted here. Damn, that board over there must have been a real schithole with the likes of you on it. Don't bother responding, I'm on the way out the door for food and a Guinness or two. You can continue to be a kitty and drink your Miller Lite.

With a few exceptions, you refugees are just plain !@#$ing stupid. How could you get that take on what I posted? Learn to comprehend.