grinreaper

What's the rate for accepting new Medicare and Medicaid patients? Why is that different than accepting private insurance patients?

Doctors accept some Medicare patients. Sort of like some lawyers will do some pro bono work. Drs. can't survive if all their patients are on Medicare just as lawyers couldn't survive if all their clients were pro bono.

Conversation closed. Tom was right. You are an idiot.

Have you given any thought about why some doctors will not accept Medicare patients? Or why some doctors limit Medicare patients? Why is that? Do you realize that they need the people that pay full retail to make up for the people on Medicare/Medicaid that don't even pay wholesale?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m246JIy5dIM

Why was the economy "crashed"? Did Obama fulfill his responsibilities as Commander-in-Chief as it pertains to well, anything? Are we back to normal?

https://conservative-daily.com/2017/08/09/wonderful-obama-admin-criminal-cover-crashes-around/ We reported this past weekend that internet sleuths had discovered a secret, private email address that Loretta Lynch had used to conduct official business. Why is this important? She testified under oath before Congress that she didn't have a secret email account and only used her official email for official business. That was a lie. She perjured herself. It turns out that Loretta Lynch had an email address named after her late grandmother, Elizabeth Carlisle. Not only did she have a secret email address, but she was using that email address to coordinate how to explain away her secret meeting with Bill Clinton on the tarmac in her private plane. You remember, this was the meeting that was just days before the FBI interviewed Hillary. We all know what they were talking about. Well, Loretta Lynch didn't want the public to be able to see her damage control, so she used this secret email account to cover-up her lawlessness. Here is where this gets even more interesting. These documents shouldn't even exist. When the FBI was asked to produce documents about the secret Clinton-Lynch tarmac meeting, James Comey's office said that there were no such documents. Yet another lie. But wait… it gets better. In the email chain discussing how to explain away the secret meeting was a single email that could bring this cover-up crashing down. The talking points were emailed to the Obama administration's White House communications office… They were involved in crafting the talking points to cover it up. When we first covered this, it was just breaking. Now, Congress is gearing up to launch a full investigation. Democrats are trying to stall this and protect the Obamas from being outed.

No, losing states is not good. If for some reason we lose Both Hawaii and Alaska we should probably bring Kenya and Indonesia into the fold. If we make it retroactive enough we could probably solve some thorny issues.

Don't you mean that Trump's lawyer has spoken with him?

In case of a water overdose, smoke a joint.

Don't take him seriously, that's a euphemism for tapping your foot on the rest stop bathroom floor.

Breaking news!

So, you weren't serious about any of the things you called Trump? I just love arguing with someone who says both Those are verifiable facts to anyone with a working human brain" and that those facts are not verifiable. You're a !@#$ing idiot and not worth my time.

No, you are trying to confuse and misrepresent the conversation. After getting caught squarely you started backpedalling and then claimed that your previous serious statement was now intentionally ludicrous. You're typical of a half dozen or so posters that come down here every six months or a year and get your ass handed to you. Then you disappear for awhile until you forget that the stove top is hot and you just can't help yourself from getting burned again.

This is what you posted: "Roger Clinton is not nearly as xenophobic, imbecilic, incurious, ill-informed, narcissistic, sociopathic, boorish, beclowning, serial lying and orangutanning as Trump. Those are verifiable facts to anyone with a working human brain." Own it, and quit being a kitty about it.

I'm sure that we all strive to make more money and if you could do it by your job performance you would. Instead you feel that you need to get the government to order that wage increase for you.

No, it's you being a kitty and since you can't verify your "facts" you are running away from your original statement. "Those are verifiable facts to anyone with a working human brain." So I guess by your very words you don't have a working brain.

No, those are opinions. He may be all of what you say, but those qualities are not verifiable nor facts. Let's face it, what matters is what he accomplishes not how warm and fuzzy you feel about him. You are a typical liberal, all consumed with "feelings" rather than facts and what is real.

Why don't you elaborate, presuming you are sober? Don't be afraid to use facts and verifiable information.

John Wawrow?

It's not just the fat cats who were exempted, their staffers were too. The administration needs to review all exemptions that were given out in order to get the ACA rammed through congress. It's sort of funny to think of all of Congress with their dicks and titties all in a ringer over this. I'm sure though that they'd work together to get something done. I'd call it forced bi-partisanship.

Good one!

Are they paid quarterly?

"unblocked".

Just as disingenuous as you've always been. That 17 day vacation just so happens to coincide with major renovations to the White House heating and air conditioning system and other work. It also coincides with a congressional recess. The White House calls it a "working vacation" while the media and its useful fools like you try to get away with this mischaracterization.