https://conservative-daily.com/2017/09/10/senator-calls-james-comey-rat-demands-new-investigation-clinton-coverup/
Republican Senator Lindsey Graham has demanded that former-FBI director James Comey testify before Congress again after evidence was discovered proving he decided to exonerate Hillary Clinton long before she or her aides were even interrogated.
Senator Graham is hardly a Conservative. But, they say that a broken clock is still right twice a day. This seems to be one of those moments.
After interviewing other FBI agents and investigators, Senators Lindsey Graham and Chuck Grassley discovered a pattern: people kept admitting that James Comey decided to let Hillary off the hook in April of 2016. The problem is that comes a full three months before Clinton and aides like Cheryl Mills and Brian Pagliano were ever interviewed by the FBI.
The reason that Graham and Grassley want to put Comey back in the hotseat is clear. He lied under oath to Congress.
He was asked – in no uncertain terms – to explain when he decided to exonerate Hillary Clinton for her Espionage Act crimes, and he explicitly said he made the decision "after" she was interviewed.
I can't believe I'm saying this, Lindsey Graham is absolutely right. I smell a rat.
.
It is a crime to lie to Congress or deliver false statements under oath. This is punishable by up to five years in prison.
James Comey is the one who has been leaking documents to the press. He admitted during his Congressional testimony that he leaked government documents to the New York Times in the hope of forcing the appointment of a Special Counsel to go after President Trump.
The arrogance of this man is that he never expected his crimes would be revealed in the process. The more Democrats try to investigate the Trump administration, the more lawlessness is revealed on the Left.
According to FBI employees' testimony to investigators, Comey was drafting his statement to exonerate Hillary Clinton months before she and 16 other key witnesses were even interviewed. Graham and Grassley point out that when these witnesses finally were interviewed, they were given "highly unusual immunity agreements."