Alaska Darin

Can't say, since I didn't watch. They physically dominated the Jets last week.

You should be happy. It's more big government.

Still can't face reality.

It's only one game.

It's going to be interesting to see how this week shakes down for the RAMS. The team isn't talentless but the coaching staff has completely lost them. Bulger is suffering from the same syndrome Bledsoe had - he's simply been hit too hard and too often. The OLine is in shambles and the DBs (especially Ty Hill) can't cover anyone.

I know it's tough for you to deduce conclusions. You can't talk sh-- about Fairchild's decisions as a coordinator while ignoring his personnel decisions at the same time. Those 2 things ARE NOT MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE. If you could wrap your head around these simple concepts, you wouldn't look like such a dumbass all the time. Now tell us again how Reed didn't produce as the number 2 receiver and how he's been mediocre.

I'd like to win against the Rams.

That about covers it.

Pass interference on a 4th-and-1 incompletion to give the Jags a first down that kept the drive alive.

You stated that he couldn't beat out Peerless Price, a decision made by Steve Fairchild. That's pretty much the point your entire argument has shifted to.

Indy just got boned pretty good. Another banner day for the zebras.

Probably not. It probably has to do with them being in the Mountain time zone and playing their homes games later than 75% of the teams in the NFL. I'm just sayin'.

Bill Walsh?

Really? So now you're lauding Steve Fairchild's decision making? I just can't wait to see what you come up with next. You should really stop thinking in public and I'll let you know when I start caring about your opinion.

Edited for absolute truth.

Hey, how about enjoying a great win by the team instead of trying to throw the backup QB under the bus? Eat a bag of dicks, cowfukker.

Who said he was great? You said he was "mediocre" and "not producing like a #2 receiver". You've now had to revise the second part to "He couldn't beat out Peerless Price" because Reed wasn't actually a starter. Aw, did I hurt your feelings because you don't like being shown publicly that you don't know what you're talking about?

Only because you don't actually know it but "are really happy he's finally producing".

I'm sure that's based on some more of your really good analysis. Now tell us again how Josh Reed, who wasn't the number 2 receiver, didn't produce like a number 2 receiver. He also didn't produce much as the starting Will. You're a !@#$ing idiot.

So Reed, a possession receiver, doesn't fit an offense that "didn't call enough deep passes". Go ahead and tell me how many games our "#2" receiver Josh Reed started in 2005 and 2006. Then you can tell me how he wasn't productive enough last season with a rookie QB and rookie RB starting.

So now Losman didn't throw the ball down the field enough? Let me guess, his strength is his accuracy underneath and pocket presence? Next you'll be telling me that Fairchild was a guru but Reed couldn't gain separation. Care to tell me how many games our #2 receiver Josh Reed started in 2005 and 2006?

When did New Orleans become a bad team? They're a little banged up but they've got a ton of talent. I don't know why everyone can't face the reality that Oakland has a talented defense. Their Special Teams played a very good game today and their offense equaled their turnover with a big play. When you get beat in 2 of 3 phases and lose the turnover battle, you usually lose.

Amen.

Yeah, let's go back to the stats as the only gauge. Let's pretend there weren't significant issues with offensive scheme, OLine play, QB play, terrible defense necessitating offensive conservatism, etc. You win. Josh Reed was terrible and finally just figured it out.

It was actually Criqui but he quickly qualified it. And it was hard to blame him for the attitude given the situation.