The best part of this post is the fact that you're talking to someone who is literally weeks away from his Doctorate in the field. Why don't you tell us your qualifications?
That entire offense played fast. You don't realize how good they really were until you pull out an old tape/DVD and compare it to what we've been watching for the last decade.
So saying that something is impossible isn't negative and is instead "honest"? I stand corrected.
I'm not "arguing" about anything. I presented a case and you said it was "impossible". Somehow that's me "arguing". I guess I learned something new today. I'll sure miss your posts in this thread, "dude".
Who said it was easy? And you don't have to be training for "an event". You have to want to accomplish something and be willing to sacrifice and be disciplined enough to accomplish it.
But thanks for your negativity.
Nutrition is probably 80% of the path to success. The workouts are the other 20. If you're really serious, consult a professional dietitian who specializes in athletic performance.
It's going to end up a smoke and mirrors game just like "PAYGO" was before it was repealed. On the surface, it sounds good. Practically, they'll use ridiculous projections to up spending even further.
But you'll buy it hook, line, and sinker.
I "joined" the thread because the title was about that sh-- rag Rolling Stone outting someone. Like I said, I think it's sad that is even a topic of discussion.
This is one of the few "programs" that has been pretty successful elsewhere. We'll probably screw it up.
I think it's unfortunate that they didn't allow anyone who bought a new car to get involved. It'd be nice to have some nice fuel efficient options available.
The fact of the matter is I don't know who either of these people are. I also really don't care about their sexuality and I think it's sad that these things are considered newsworthy.