Cash

I doubt it. Palmer will likely never have as good an opportunity as he did last year, and he put up 580 yards and 1 TD. I think he can (will?) put up better numbers for us, but if he had #1 talent I think we would’ve seen it last year. I’m pretty whelmed by this signing, which is to say in the middle. Here’s what I like: -He’s 25 and could still have his career year ahead of him -He seems to mostly play X - this should let Coleman play Z and help 2 positions I’m still totally on board with drafting a receiver early if that’s the best value.

I agree with this, and I stand by my earlier post. There’s room for improvement on Allen’s end, but I still think we’d see a bigger statistical impact with different players being targeted on those deep shots.

He's a free agent. Personally I expect him to be back on a small raise.

My all time WR group of guys in my lifetime as a fan: Moss & Megatron outside, Jerry Rice in the slot. Megatron was the biggest WR in the league, almost the fastest, maybe the best route runner, and had incredible hands whether the catch was contested or not. He's basically the perfect WR you'd construct in a lab. If his career was longer and/or he played on better teams, there could've been a real argument for him as best ever. As is, he's still easily on the short list for guys you'd want for one game or one season. I agree with most of this. I liked our offense a lot last year, but pre-Cooper it showed it had a real weakness, and the addition of Cooper helped but didn't fully address it. And "everybody eats" can work just as well with more receiving talent, provided that receiving talent doesn't have a Diggs-type attitude. I would argue it works better: If the defense really has to account for a guy who'll otherwise feast on them, then that opens things up for everyone else. So hypothetically, DK would either be feasting on bad/dumb/cocky teams, or putting up low numbers but freeing up Shakir et al for big production. Until I'm proven wrong, I will maintain that Allen's deep ball numbers will look a lot better if/when we get him better deep ball targets. I'm of the opinion that the pass catcher has way more to do with deep ball success than he does with short or intermediate catches. Just think about it: On every deep ball, the QB releases the ball when the receiver is maybe 10-30 yards away from the catch point. And yeah, we've all seen some truly uncatchable balls from Allen and others, but a lot of the "bad passes" we've seen are IMO bad adjustments by the WR, or inability of the WR to leverage his body against the defender, etc.

Agree with both of these statements. I think Kincaid’s best football is ahead of him. But Knox getting more PT wouldn’t be a problem in and of itself, and Z. Richardson might benefit from a real opportunity. Given age and contract, I wouldn’t expect to throw much more into the trade if I was the Bills. Kincaid has to be worth about a 2nd rounder right now IMO. And I don’t think Metcalf is worth a 1st rounder.

One other thing to add on the Brees comparison front: Brees is probably the most accurate QB in NFL history. If he's not #1, he's at least close to it. Allen's accuracy is quite good at this point, but I don't think he'll ever get on the same level as Brees, and that's fine. We shouldn't need our reigning MVP to turn into the 1st or 2nd most accurate QB of all time. Personally, I think completion % is a decent but not great metric for QB play and offensive success. I certainly don't want Allen's to be on the low end. (Which, these days, is probably anything around 60% or lower.) If he threatens his career high next year, that's probably a good thing, but it's far from the only path to success. This past year, we had a ton of WR screens and a few designed RB swing passes that represented easy completions and helped Allen's completion %. But we also saw defenses get better at defending them as the year went on. If we kept hammering them all year, Allen's completion % might have been even higher, but with a TON of completions for 1-3 yards that didn't help the offense.

…in some, but not all, of the measurements. If you aced your exams in math and science, but didn’t take the exams in history or language, is that straight A’s?

I know it’s unofficial, but the point of RAS is to blend all of the athletic testing into 1 number. So how can he have an “unofficial 10.0 pending agility drills”? Isn’t that like saying, “I got a prefect score on the SAT, pending the math section”?

Assuming Cook plays for the Bills next year (with or without a new contract), I totally agree. I would say 5th round or higher is allowable, but no RBs in the 4th or earlier. I don’t care if the guy available in the late 4th has a high 3rd round grade and is sticking out on the board. Those guys come along every other year.

I see your point, but it doesn’t move the needle for me personally. 2 things: 1. We’ve all seen games where, down the stretch, one team’s defense is completely unable to stop the opposing offense. In those games, I think you’d see a conversion rate more like 40-50%, which I want no part of. 2. Again, I like watching special teams, and I think the game is more fun when special teams matter. I know some people disagree. But for me, even if doing 4th and long gets you to a good outcome from a game design perspective, it still makes the game less fun to watch for me.

Yikes. I don't watch the UFL, but at the NFL level at least, even 4th and 15 is terrible, and 4th and 12 would be outright untenable IMO. The pendulum is already too far swung towards offense. And while it seems to be swinging back just a tad, a rule change like this would push it even farther towards offense. I dunno, maybe I'm old and out of touch, but I LIKE special teams and I don't think minimizing/eliminating them makes the on-field product better or more entertaining.

In your opinion, are any/all of those names capable of playing both outside spots? Tutu and Hollywood strike me as Z only, but I'll admit that's based only on them being small. I know even less about Dyami Brown.

What part of what I wrote came across as hyperbole? Just curious - I thought it was a pretty measured take TBH.

Everyone except Sirianni should be fired. Andy Reid's team did WORSE this year compared to the last 2. And everyone else didn't even make the Super Bowl, which is the minimum benchmark for coaching competence.

Thanks for this. I just don't think "Super Bowl or bust" is a fair standard to hold anyone to. MAYBE in the days before free agency and the salary cap, when it was a lot more feasible to assemble and keep a superior team. I don't know if we'll win a Super Bowl under McDermott and Beane, but I think most external candidates would make our chances get a lot worse. If someone could guarantee me that their replacements would be upgrades, I'd absolutely call for their heads. But you can't, and I don't like those odds - at least not right now. And for the record, I think the Bills *did* show improvement this year. The talent level took a step back due to cap reasons, but the wins and offensive stats did not. We went to the AFC Championship game, which isn't the goal, but is still an accomplishment. [Side note: if making the NFL's Final Four doesn't count for anything, why even bother watching games? Just show up for the Super Bowl, since that's the only thing that matters.] Our QB won the MVP award, which a Bill hasn't done since Thurman in 1991. It took everything the Chiefs had to narrowly beat us by 3 in their house. And both of our coordinators should get better next season, if only just due to having more experience.

If we can get him on the MVS deal from last year, by all means sign me up. If it's more in the ballpark of 2 year $16 million... not a fan but I'd hold my nose and root for Brown to have a career year. (Which wouldn't be saying much, because he's been a bust to date.)

To be fair, he also said Jimmy Clausen would be a stud. I'm generally pro-Kiper and like his evaluations, but that one was a huge L.

So the article is quoting Dan Graziano, who in turn is saying that unnamed people with the Chiefs are making this claim about what Allen has “long wanted”. Color me skeptical that the people Graziano talked to actually have good insight into what Allen wants.

This pleases me.

This is funnier if the year is not a typo. Hopefully by then the Bills aren’t owned by the Harkonnens.

Yeah. Between BTJ and JJ, I’m wondering if there’s any WR superteams in college or this year’s draft - because that #2 on the superteam seems to wind up just as good in the pros. Give me Megatron and Vikings Randy Moss on the outside, and any version of Jerry Rice in the slot. Completely unstoppable.

Great post. Regarding the OP, any 5 game sample size is basically meaningless. But also, the tweet in question isn't really stating anything in the first place. Worst all time WHAT in the Super Bowl era? Points given up in losses? Points given up in 5 straight losses, ignoring interim wins? There's no basis for comparison provided, just "worst all time". Likely because if Dov Kleiman had provided it, it would've been immediately obvious how stupid and/or cherrypicked it was. EDIT: Re-reading the original tweet, it seems most likely that the comp is "points given up by the Bills in these specific 5 losses" vs. "points given up in any 1 playoff run", which would be a moronic comparison. Now, I have no problem with coherent discussion of our playoff defense. It's certainly hasn't been inspiring during this run as a contender. It's hard for me to say how much of that actually falls on our team (including coaches). In 2023, we were running a M*A*S*H unit out there. (No one's fault but bad luck IMO) In 2022, the whole team was completely flat. (Maybe some blame on the coaches here? But I think mostly off-field reasons which, again, are mostly bad luck.) In 2020, 2021, & 2024, mostly our defense just got beat by arguably the best QB/Offensive HC combo of all time. No shame in that, but it would be nice to win one of these at some point. My question is this: Mahomes plays his absolulte best against us in the playoffs, pretty consistently. Is that because he's elevating his game to another level up against Josh Allen, or is that because our defense is schematically weak against Mahomes and/or Andy Reid? Or something else entirely?

We really don’t need this information 6 hours before kickoff. And - good news - we shall receive this information 90 minutes before kickoff.

I’m very happy about Brady staying! I think he’s still ata a point where he’s improving as an OC, which bodes very well for us next year. There’s a good chance he winds up leaving to take the Saints job in 2-3 years if he hasn’t already left before then. And if so, that’s fine! I just wanted at least one more year.

I would love for Monken to be out of Baltimore.