Cash

Maybe controversial, but I’m not sure I’d include Pike. He was great for sure, but I’mnot sure he was great enough to make it as a wedge buster. Steve Tasker is not up for debate, so I won’t bother debating him. Agree on Brian Moorman - he was legitimately the team’s best player for a few years. And while that’s a damning condemnation of the offensive and defensive talent at the time, Moorman was nevertheless special as a punter. He’s a lock for me. I think you could make a strong case for Steve Christie, but I’m not sure I’d make it. He’s in the same category as Pike for me - worthy, but maybe not one of the 4 most worthy. I think there’s got to be at least 1 return man for me. McKelvin could’ve had a shot if he wasn’t such a bonehead. Roscoe Parrish is fairly up there. I think I’m forgetting someone else, but it probably doesn’t matter, because my pick is Terrance McGee. He was my guy! And his 98-yard non-TD as the half expired remains the single best on-field metaphor for the Bills. Okay, no other names are jumping out at me, so I guess it’s between Pike and Christie for me (until Bass hits a game winner in the Super Bowl). And… my guy says Steve Christie, welcome to my personal Bills Special Teams Mount Rushmore! Now to find a mountain and get started.

The Condo! Nicknamed as such because he was even bigger than 'House' Ballard. IIRC, we played a very early overseas game - in Germany maybe? And at some pre-game PR event, the locals requested not the biggest stars, but the biggest players. We sent House and Condo.

You can throw John McCargo and Kyle Williams into the same bucket. Who said he made Revis look like trash? That's massive hyperbole. It's more accurate to say that Revis didn't shut Stevie down the way Revis did most #1 WR options at that time. I.e., Stevie had some success against Revis, whereas plenty of better overall WRs had NO success against Revis.

I also expect a fair bit of chest puffing if NE starts anywhere near half-decent. Maybe more from their fans than the team, but guess what? Like 30% of national sports media are Boston fans. Any chest puffing will make its way to McD/Allen, and they tend to take that personally.

1. I agree Hancock isn’t relevant - I think he’s competing against Cam Lewis, J. Ingram, and backup safeties. 2. I think Tre is really competing against Dane Jackson for a roster spot. If he’s good enough to earn that spot, he’ll be competing against Hairston to start. 3. I’ll go on record and say two things. First, we will not cut Dorian Strong this year. (Maybe he goes on IR, so I won’t proclaim that he makes the team.) Second, Tre White makes the team if healthy - meaning he isn’t cut or traded prior to week 1. If I’m wrong on either, you have my permission to dunk on me. I will accept it with shame.

Interesting take. I disagree but I’m open to be convinced otherwise. From memory, I think Coleman’s non-40 measurables were pretty good, and I don’t recall Kincaid’s being crazy exceptional. I agree that generally TE is a slower-developing position than WR. But the other factor to me is age. Coleman is what, 3-4 years younger than Kincaid? That’s a big difference, both in terms of athleticism and development. Athleticism: Pro athlete-level men don’t usually peak athletically till somewhere in the mid 20s. Coleman probably (not definitely) has more room to grow athletically. Development: Again, granted that TE is slower to develop on average. But Coleman has a lot less time on task at his position, and a lot less football experience in general since he was more basketball-focused until recently.

Depends on who you ask. I’m not super active on the board, but I’ve seen a LOT more people writing Coleman off than people expecting him to break out.

Great point. It’s easy for us fans to just say “play the young guy, he’ll get better”, but if his teammates don’t trust him, that’s causing extra problems beyond just one rookie making mistakes. In a similar vein, there is a case for a Tre White or similar to make the roster as a backup over a better-below-the-neck young guy. Because we know Tre is a phenomenal locker room guy, and he came in with no expectations of starting.

The Bills, at least, seem to consider NCB and boundary CB as different positions, and also seem to think NCB and S are a lot closer to each other than either is to boundary CB. We've seen a number of S/NCB depth guys - Siran Neal and Cam Lewis both come to mind - but very few boundary/nickel depth guys. Jamarcus Ingram is about the only one, and even then he's only played on the boundary when there was no one else available. Both Neal and Lewis have also filled in at boundary CB, but only when there were multiple injuries in the same game. My guess is that Parrino has internalized that after a number of years covering this team, and was meaning "boundary corners" specifically. Also worth noting: Parrino isn't allowed to report on where players are lining up, but he is able to witness it and remember. It's possible that Hancock has been practicing exclusively at S all spring. If that's the case, Parrino would probably not think of him as any kind of corner at this point.

Agree with this. LB is one of the few spots where I could see us in the market for a veteran cut. Spector gets hurt every year and is in the last year of his deal, so they won’t hesitate to move on if they think a fading vet will be an upgrade this season. Bernard getting hurt is probably the biggest risk on the defense. Plus there could be a slight trade market for Spector - meaning maybe you get a low 7th rounder for him instead of cutting him outright. I have no idea if this Bungles guy would be an upgrade over Spector in 2025, but if any of the Football Knowers on the board have a take, please weigh in.

I don't generally re-watch a lot of games, and pretty much never re-watch losses. So for me, the list is more about which painful losses I HAVE re-watched. There are a few: -All 4 Super Bowls (I think; I was pretty young and maybe just rewatched 1 or 2 of them) -Bills/Titans wildcard Jan 2000, aka Music City Miracle. Really hit home how bad Rob Johnson was prior to the final drive. I also spent a LOT of time obsessing over whether the 'lateral' itself went forward or not. -Bills/Chiefs divisional Jan 2022, aka 13 Seconds - but I should disclose that I haven't rewatched anything that came after Gabe's final TD. Same. Any time it's come up, I tell people "I don't need to watch it; I lived it." I hear from reliable sources (Bills fans and non-Bills fans) that it's great, and I have no problem recommending it to other people. If we ever win a Super Bowl, maybe then I'll watch it, who knows?

Offense: More effectiveness when running 2 TEs. I'd also like to see more of a multifaceted gameplan, at least for the playoffs. What I mean is that we have Plan A, then we anticipate how the defense will adjust to stop Plan A, and Plan B is there to take advantage of that defensive adjustment. Defense: More multiplicity. In McD's early years, we had a lot more of guys moving around the formation and offenses not knowing what looks we were going to run. Lorenzo Alexander was particularly key in that regard. But the last few years, there's been less disguising and especially less-effective disguising. I don't know the stats, but it feels like ages since one of our zone blitzes or delayed blitzes resulted in a free rusher. Personnel-wise, we need guys to be better at defeating blocks. But scheme-wise, we need to be better at confusing the offense. This is extra important against good QBs who can get the ball out quickly and accurately.

Thank you. By the “only a Super Bowl matters” logic, none of us should ever watch a regular season game. Or playoff game pre-Super Bowl, for that matter. Just show up for the one game that matters. That would free up a lot of my time, but I don’t think it would enhance my life. And again - yeah, I very much want the Bills to win a Super Bowl in my lifetime. (Preferably if it’s also in my dad’s lifetime.) But while the end of each season in the Allen era has been rough, the first and the middle parts have been great. Watching these teams week in and week out has been a true joy and an absolute delight.

I love it! I’ll be watching.

https://ras.football/ Hairston: INCOMPLETE, but on pace for 9.63 pending agility drills. (And based on his highlights, he probably would've done well on the agility drills.) Hancock: 9.82 - and that's at CB. Likely would be even higher at S if that's where he winds up. Strong: 8.34