Niagara Bill

Without a doubt society loves their guns but lack of control has put them in the hands of gangs, theirs and violent people. The drug culture has been mixed in for the past 40 years. You have said nothing except I want my guns, I want to kill anyone who try to invade my space. 1. Stop producing them. 2. Stop importing them. 3. Increase fines for guns off property, with exceptions for hunting. 4.jail term for possession of any gun that can be considered semi or automatic. My knowledge of guns is very limited but nobody needs a gun that fires huge volumes in short periods. 5. Teach respectful firearm use in schools Now I know this is unsaleable to the gun crowd but is the beginning of keeping people alive. Maybe you think that a certain number of deaths is ok, like covid deaths, the sacrifice of 500,000 so the rights not to wear a mask is protected. And before you go all righteous on me I know 500,000 deaths were not caused by the mask issue. Now there are 5 steps more to reduce deaths of citizens than you have made. So Chef, go make those good eats...enjoy...everyone has their feet dug in so solutions cannot be debated. If 500,000 deaths doesn't fix the mask issue, then this violence and mass killings cannot be stopped either.

Guns in the home...not on the street. Listen Chef....150 years ago the country knew that guns on the street were very dangerous, they preferred no guns. Cities and towns enforced it, (see Wyatt Earp). Protect your property. The alternatives are only 2 possibilities. No guns produced and sold or everyone have guns. No sure why you cannot see that. All the little steps the peahead politicians take are of no help. Too many loopholes. It is starting to be as complicated as the tax code. This is life and death. Laws need to be sharp and simple. Every soccer mom wants no guns, every longneck drinker doing the boot skootin boogie wants total guns for all.

If guns are illegal on the street for all then safety increases for all. If not then everyone must have carry permits and carry, church, school, restaurants, malls, gas stations, gyms, beaches, etc etc. All I say ud euther control or full availability every day every where.

It is a tough decision for sure. Fortunate that I have not been forced into this situation. I get the need for hand gun for home safety, and I have never been against them, ARs etc should never have become part of society, . I do believe that carrying any gun with bullets outside the home should be illegal unless for hunting purpose. The question I was asked was to chose, more or none....I answered.

Hahahahahahahahahahahaha. Can't answer the question eh surfer dude....me thinks the racist is you.

EX+1.....and why would surfing be prejudicial dude. Don't all cali's surf? Temper temper little boy....

If your town does not have a problem, then why are you against cities and towns that do controlling the situation.? Wyatt Earp stop guns in his town if Tombstone, and Matt Dillion never allow guns in Dodge to protect Miss Kitty. No frigging politician or NDA or Supreme Court stopped it. As for myopic, ??? I only commented on your topic. The other major group I have read that are against vaccines are certain baptists groups and the State of Utah which has a huge population of certain religions.. is color a reason to reject a vaccine. NO! It is a long distrust of politicians, media, and authorities to a large group of marginalized citizens. But it is ok that a white preacher can say it. Whoops, the little green men of Area 51 has been confirmed.

If there are no guns available and there is no threat of life, the answer is no. A stolen necklace is not worth a life. Spend your money on security and cameras Hey SoCal, EX +1.. you open your mouth about China, Russia, Mexico etc. Why? Because you have an interest and opinion. Surfer dude....

Well Timmy. I hope you love Florida. I am glad your guns help you feel safe. I am glad you will be armed and able to shoot back at the nut with the AK at the local mall and protect those around you. I am hopeful that while sitting on your front porch with you kids or grandkids you will feel capable of defending them against the drive-by shooter with the gun in your pocket. I am thrilled you can sit comfortably on your patio in the morning with your coffee, newspaper and gun on the table beside you. Make sure your family members carry at all times when they are not with you. Make sure you practice often because you know what they say. I version of events is better than two. Ps. You think you are the most conservative country yet a larger % voted against that. So what you really are is a group of people in your nation who believe in the rules of 1776 regarding guns and invasion. They also believe in the deep state, area 51, anti vaccine, that a mask restricts your freedom but speed limits, alcohol rules, hunting laws, etc do not. Surfs up.

Someone stole all my credit cards. I won't be reporting it. The thief spends less than my wife! Buda bing The doctor phoned Mrs. COHEN. and said "Mrs Cohen, your check came back" Mrs. Cohen replied, "so did my arthritis"

I have no problem with more if that is the solution. No guns is great. More guns is good if it is more acceptable. Balance the scales. Carry where ever you want. Open carry to. Malls, cars, theaters, games, church. The status quo is not working.

What I want is no auto or semi guns in the country, if you want to hunt great but large mags not needed...2 shots only before reload, hand guns in house for defence with limited power. Stop manufacturing for the public of powerful guns, stop import, guns for target shooting stored at range only. That is my starting point for a guy who has not got a lot of knowledge of all the guns out there. If not, stop all restrictions and lets have a go at it. Either the guy who entered the store to randomly kill has to be concerned about anyone with the ability to shoot back or stop the gun production. Sitting still and doing nothing will only allow it to get worse.

Was with ya that day. Brought Jack D and Cognac to tailgate because beer froze within a minute. Had a great barrel fire that day....

I DID NOT LEAVE THE COMEBACK GAME AT HALF TIME LIKE 40,000 OTHERS DID.

Defence for the army as they were designed. However, as I said, the opposite to a ban is to allow everyone to carry any gun they want. Then Marshall Dillon would have an issue. If you can't the gangs and nuts from carrying, join em. You don't need 1 more gun, just an AK vs hand gun..sorry, border is closed.

Trying to justify walking the streets or fields with assault weapons based on 250 year old writings in too much to accept when citizens are bringing killed far too often. IMHO no need for auto or semi auto for sport or target. They are name fir killing and destruction.

You are right, not a gun owner but my thoughts are based on the present situation as being unacceptable and getting worse. I understand hunting, targets shooting, property and family defense. What I believe must happen in end the possibility of military powerful weapons in the assault range, overpowering the population. Hand gun to hand gun these mass shooting end...even a nut hasn't got the guts to face mobs when he doesn't gave a decided advantage in weapons. IMHO I am not trying yk force anything, just trying to have a debate that doesn't start and end with either full gun ban, or It is my right by the constitution.

Thank Goodness. Get your defence built around your house and family. Make sure you can defend against the invasion. Ps the peppercorn sauce was great. I think there certainly is a threat to your family...I get it, but if it doesn't get rolled back, then everyone must be armed at all times. This is the choice. Hope you and the family never have to face the decision. Stay safe.

Stupidity is thinking that a man 250 years ago could think that an AK 47 would be necessary for personal safety and be used against fellow peaceful citizens. Stupidity is thinking assault rifles and 100 rounds is required to hunt a 160 lb. deer when a bow was used in Franklin's day. Davey Crocket would be appalled. Stupidity is defending the indefensible. The safety and death of 10 citizens in Boulder this week is not temporary, nor do they have liberty. But the people who made the gun got rich, the guy who sold the gun is having his long neck tonight before dancing to Boot Scootin boogie. So 2 have liberty. 10 have death, the funeral guys are happy.

Ok then Chef...let's continue on this path. More death, rich gun producers, let's make gun ownership mandatory and cheap, put one or two in every house, apartment, condo, small business, let school teachers wear sidearms, let all university student carry guns into class, let every factory worker bring one to the job, how about mailman. You cannot restrict me from carrying gun to school or work if they are so available. That to me is the alternative. I am not being flippant, but if stopping production and availability of weapons of war us not possible then the alternative must be acceptable. Being partially into accepting a culture of guns is impossible.IMHO. Gang members need the right to be killed on their street vifnrr as much as anyone. So tonight it is steak and peppercorn sauce (not kidding). Bbq is hot gotta go for now.

If you think mass killing of citizens is a joke...thats on you. 🙃 Not arguing with you...just saying producers must be controlled and you can stop imports when you want. That is a dumb statement. Ps I would not insult a chef, but your skin is very thin. Congress has tried to make it more difficult and failed....outright.

Ok, let me ask you. Did Franklin produce nuclear weapons or fly a kite to find electricity. Did Franklin conceive anything like weapons of today? And the USA is being invaded by us Canadians again. The day of protecting property against invasion is over. Called nuclear bombs. No more danger from Indian uprising when out skinning their buffaloes. Seriously. 2021. AK Not needed for covid 19.

You can afford the handgun with tax if necessary. Yes, job change us necessary. Many people liked training horses, building buggy whips, building gas engines for cars, steam engines fir trains etc etc. Finding and controlling every person with the desire to kill is impossible. History is proof. What should we do with them, institutionalize? You already have the most people in the world imprisoned. So to hunt you need a magazine with 15/50/100/200 shots?. I am not making fun of your name. If you think I am I apologize. Guns my good man. Guns. Don't produce them....

Don't produce them in the first place. Destroy what you can. Obviously there are huge issues, but producing more and more powerful weapons does nothing except increase slaughter of innocent citizens.

You have valid thoughts. The demilitarizing of police must occur. Today police forces have become military forces both in defending and assault. They do not protect citizens. They often do not de-escalated. Imagine we now have police forces with tanks. Ridiculous. Control of high powered weapons can only be a step in reducing violence in society, allow pleasure for hunting, targets etc, and control of gangs and criminal access. A ban is impossible and illogical. The constitution allows it, honor that, protect citizens.