Flbillsfan#1

The point is a team does not BECOME successful by letting their best players leave.

Why would Adrianna want you when she could have ME?

I heard about the TO locker on the Shredd & Ragan show podcast the other day. (GREAT podcast for out of area Bills fans)

It would be GREAT if they did. I would hope AT LEAST for the 50 year Anniversary.

I was thinking the same thing myself watching that game.

Not to mention that his OLD BUDDY McNabb would be his QB. Talk about the TO SHOW..............getcha popcorn ready if that ever happened.

I don't know about "earned it" but he is YOUNG & proven. I would HOPE the Bills could get something done with him.(they are used to OVER PAYING players) IF they can't make him happy then you may be right & they have NO CHOICE but to trade him. I would want a #1 & 2 this year & a #1 & 3 next year if I were GM.

You IMPLIED that it had no effect by stating he only had 1 good year.

The fact Peters held out, No Training Camp, etc. had NOTHING to do with his off year in 08.

The Bills are not populated by OLD MEN on their last legs that suddenly look like they are 28 years old again when they join the Pats* (Seau, Harrison...........On & On)

It would be a STUPID MOVE by the Bills to trade Peters, LT's don't grow on trees. What could Philly offer that would compensate for the loss of Peters?

The 49ers were a GOOD team when TO was there. How have they been since he left? Philly could never quite make that last push to the Super Bowl, With TO's help they got there & TO Played a GREAT game in the SUPER BOWL on a BROKEN LEG. The Eagles should have won that game. The loss is on McNabb & that is why Philly fan HATES him. TO got the Cowboys to the playoffs for the 1st time in YEARS & the loss was on Romo. They had a disapointing season last year because Romo did not get the ball to TO often enough.

The worst signing by the Bills is Ryan Fitzpatrick, & the Bills will have to depend on him or the Chrose to get the ball to TO for at least a few games.

I heard Thurman Thomas on the radio today. He was asked if TO would find Buffalo boring, his reply was Buffalo is a GREAT PLACE & when TO wants to PARTY he can always go to TO (Toronto) as he did along with Jimbo & others.

A poll that was on the Board was almost 85% in favor of the TO signing so I think your numbers are OFF a little.

The other poster GOT IT. Oh the IRONY.

You read my 1st post correctly which is why my 2nd post is so funny. The IRONY of Sage not getting the OBVIOUS Sarcasm of my sarcastic reply to the origional poster is just TOO FUNNY. He must feel REALLY STUPID.

I was being sarcastic about where the origional poster had been FOR THOSE without a SARCASM METER. The reason the Bills signed TO was in LARGE PART for marketing purposes. The posts on this board & others reflected the disgust felt by the Bills fans for the front office before the TO signing.

NO BACKTRACK. MY post was OBVIOUSLY SARCASTIC & If you did not get it, it flew SO FAR OVER your head you have NO Sarcasm meter.

You mean as it did when you read my post?

TO does not run his mouth if the team WINS. It is only when they lose & he feels underutilized that he mouths off.

Where have you been? They signed a HOF receiver, THAT is what happened to make that change. The question is Did the Bills sign TO BECAUSE of all the CRITICISM on this board & others?

3) He drops dozens of passes & sucks. - Even if he does, defenses will have to RESPECT & cover him opening things up for Evans & Lynch.

It's a WIN/WIN, Ralph can THANK Jerry Jones for saving this season. Hopefully a couple more free agents want to get on the Bills bus.

Babe Ruth also struck out a lot.