BillsVet

Having a HC establishing the vision and determining roster priorities with a GM supporting personnel acquisition is showing some serious drawbacks. That is, if the roster vision is askew and the HC is under pressure to get results. The draft has to be more strategic than Buffalo handles it, as GM's tend to think long-term and less on what will help them next season...which is what a HC is focused on. An example was the 2022 draft going CB and RB to address needs in Rounds 1 and 2. I don't want to belabor that draft., yet understandable if the HC's short-term perspective has more sway over the GM's. In that way, I can see them going defense heavy again to suit oncoming needs and the HC's vision. Still disagree that loading up on that side provides more wins than does building an offense to compete with AFC Championship teams and perhaps others.

Allen's been in his prime now three seasons - since 2020 - and there are things even he cannot mitigate.

We're not even past the draft or into mini-camp, training camp, or the pre-season. And already people are trying to get out in front of if there are bad results. Has nothing to do with "glass half full." It's mentally setting the basement for results and then we can go back and say...look, I told you so! "One of the problems with being a pessimist is that you can never celebrate when you are proven right." - Thomas Sowell But here, there's no celebration...people just start LAMP's as though they earn royalties off their pessimism.

This thread could be re-titled: "It's hard to win in the NFL."

The 2019 WC game against Houston comes to mind when it was obvious Josh tried to do too much. Back then it was because their top receivers amounted to Brown and Beasley who were good, but not WR1 types. Kudos to them on acquiring Diggs, but the plan on offense since the 2020 off-season is what exactly? There isn't one UFA or pick that is anywhere near Diggs to scare an opposing defense. Yeah, Josh needs to protect himself and make plays from the pocket. No argument there. But if keeping pace with KC and CIN is done with a UFA G, 2 WR3/4 types, and a RB this is more of the same from previous off-seasons. I don't put much into late 1st or 2nd round picks contributing out of the gate, but if they go defense with the 1st or both OBD is lost without a map.

McD is acutely aware of the criticism levied, so this is him getting out in front of it. He knows expectations are high for 2023 and being an astute PR minded guy, he will set the narrative. I also suspect McBeane are, for the first time in their tenure, chafing at the criticism about their "process" and trying to establish that it's not them that needs to change. It's always something or someone else in McD's world. Couldn't be that the emphasis on building defense has short-changed the offensive skill and OL areas leaving Josh to make plays. Nah, that would mean McD might have to adapt to having a franchise QB and admit his "process" needs major tweaks to an overhaul.

The benefit of trading a 2nd is that McBeane don't have a chance to over-draft a Cody Ford, Boogie Basham, or James Cook type player. KC signed Watkins to that 3 year 16 AAV contract with one 1,000 yard season on his then 4 year NFL career. Hopkins is a 10 year vet with 6 1,000+ seasons with 5 1st or 2nd All-Pro selections. The only similarity is the cost of the contract, of which Watkins' was in UFA as opposed to what comes over in a prospective trade.

I see it differently. McD couldn't fire the DC he hired in 2017 who'd been on the job 6 seasons without looking like he was throwing someone under the bus. Especially a guy who's liked in NFL circles, though will be 64 this year. It wouldn't surprise me if the Bills pay him this year on his "sabbatical" then allow and out to find another job in 2024. That transition keeps McD clean, gives the HC even more operational control over his beloved defense, McD can groom someone on the job, and McD does Frazier a favor. McD is more political behind the scenes than people recognize or give him credit for. Also doesn't hurt because it's abundant that McD gets whatever he wants to staff his defense...firing the DC after all the investment there really reflects poorly on the dominant voice in the room and his defensive preference.

This thread partly summarized: Let's use our highest draft asset to fill a need. Economy of resources and a positional value-based approach? Nah, too challenging.

Former Panthers players, coaches and admins are to the Bills as former Bills players, coaches, and admins and are to the Giants.

God rest Ted Thompson... But TT 2.0 is becoming a painfully appropriate comp. Hope Beane finds some guts and tells his boss McD that they're not going defense as regularly happened 2017-2022.

Time will tell...have to hope McBeane learn from mistakes and correct themselves. One thing I know is...Belichick was nothing without Brady. Right, CB? I kid, I kid.

Kansas City manages to get it done, but they are a well-run organization with a superior roster vision. So much so that they entered the 2023 off-season as defending SB champions with 14M in cap space. Of course, it requires bold moves to accomplish of which trading Tyreek Hill was one. I vividly remember people here claiming that KC would not be nearly as good the following season. So much for that. The built-in excuse that having a franchise QB makes roster development exceedingly difficult is absurd. Economy of resources is the key, and the Bills waste assets on RB's, middling DL, and other overpaid UFAs. I'm glad to see more people here begin to doubt the PR efforts of McBeane who, backed into a corner, are offering weak responses as to why they can't fly with the best AFC teams.

The RB mis-handling is a contributing cause of their cap problems. Not a root cause. The DL prioritization under McD's to include overpaid and undereffective UFA's along with pedestrian draft picks are another contributing cause though, yes. Their cap issues were not minor.... they were 19.6M over the cap before all the re-structures, good for 26th in the NFL.

The Bills took 2 off-seasons to fix cap issues from the previous regime and put themselves right back there 4 seasons later If people want to understand why, a lack of vision on draft day is a contributing cause to that issue. Singletary and Moss cost RD3 picks, albeit were on rookie contracts. They ultimately replaced both with veterans in Harris and Hines who cost more in cap than a rookie contract player would. They continue doubling down at RB and then cry how they're cap poor. In 7 off-seasons, they've re-signed McCoy, signed UFAs like Tolbert, DiMarco, Ivory, Gore, Yeldon, Breida, and now Harris. All while using 3 top-100 picks on RBs. Is it that hard to identify a player in the 4th-7th rounds or via UDFA that can offer production on a rookie contract so they can start investing in WR's at the top of the draft? It shouldn't be, but then again RD1 seems reserved for QB's and defensive players.

Audentes fortuna iuvat...SPQR!

Scott...why do you have to be such a buzzkill and let the cat out of the bag? We're celebrating RB signings to set up more defense in RD1 for goodness sakes! Come on dude.

McD is in the room...like he is during all off-season. In fact, his vision is how you end up going defense in RD1 the past 5 out of 7 years of his tenure. And there are some long-time posters here seeing it could be 6 out of 8.

Yeah...Beane's free agency prowess this off-season really gives him a leg up in the Executive of the Year award for 2023. On offense alone the haul of two WR3/4 types, a guard, and now a RB speak to that in volumes. Especially considering they pushed more cap down the road to get themselves into a position to sign these guys. He'll solidify the award when they go safety or LB in Round 1.

Bills lead the league in taking the best player available at a position of defense. It could well go down that way after the CB, RB, LB sequence last year. I'd imagine he's pretty stoic about that.

And a GM who went along with that roster building strategy, didn't pound the table for more offense, and spent heavily on middling UFAs that did not offer value. Perhaps there's a few moves left and they're learning off the last couple off-seasons. Who knows.

Much of this decision depends on which role they want him to play. If he's their idea of competition at WR2, well, not ideal. If he's a WR4/5 type who'll play special teams, great. Most people expected a higher-level WR signing before the draft, i.e. not an unproven rookie, who would give Buffalo a complement to Diggs who they acquired 3 years ago. It's not unreasonable to be disappointed with acquisitions who clearly aren't putting them alongside Cincinnati, Kansas City, or their primary AFC competition.

Upgrading WR4-5 is not a major impact to the offensive talent. Bills liked him so much they gave him a 1 year deal. Not a ringing endorsement. Games 12-16: 9 receptions for 137 yards, 0 TD's, 16 targets. Not active in Week 17; took 48 offensive snaps in playoff game at Buffalo - 0 targets. Hopefully this season Dorsey will give Davis the ability to separate, run more than 2-3 patterns, and make contested catches.

Amazing that they are only starting to understand this after KC and CIN showed offensive speed is not optional the past 3 seasons. Which also make their reported interest in a big back make less sense, but that's another McBeanie non-sequitur.

https://www.buffalobills.com/news/takeaways-as-gm-brandon-beane-looks-ahead-to-the-2021-offseason The GM himself said after the 13 seconds game your last game says a lot about what's wrong with your roster. And that holds true for the 2022 season. Observant posters saw and commented on the lack of WR depth and issues along the OL heading into last season. Offensive skill talent speed has been an issue for a couple seasons now along with over-investment into the defense which lacks scheme versatility. Maybe McBeane up their game from the last 2 off-seasons and figure how to construct a roster that isn't cap poor and gets value. Maybe they support Josh more this season...but the last 2 end of season losses spoke volumes about where they were.