BillsVet

Jay Glazer reported at the time that the team was not actively shopping Lynch, despite having a healthy FJ and newly drafted CJ. Why would a team go 3 deep at RB at the expense of other positions? This move illustrates the reactionary moves the team makes, most recently in the form of how they addressed the QB position. Decisions at OBD over multiple GM's have been isolated and unable to anticipate the cause and effect those decisions will have.

I will never understand the lack of synergy on offense with this franchise. Whether it was Schonert running a no-huddle with Trentative or now with a Nix built OL featuring a lot of big guys blocking for a water-bug back in a hurry up offense ostensibly run by a rookie QB. None of it makes sense or is remotely coordinated for optimal success on game day. It's not hard to predict that sort of change is far too much and will require them to add more suitable pieces, particularly to the OL, in order for the offensive plan to work. This is part of the reason why rebuilds in Buffalo take years and other teams are doing it in about 2 years if that.

Gotta give the Bills credit here. They could never have known that letting Levitre go would mean Brown would stink so bad. But, in their infinite wisdom, they signed someone the Steelers didn't want to make sure they were set at LG. Well, if you can't anticipate problems, work like heck after they're obvious to show you're trying. They're rebuilding anyway.

Guards are a dime a dozen anyway.

How many QB's can they get on the active roster in 1 season anyway?

Well, given that Seattle started a rebuild in 2010 and by 2012 was considered a top NFC team, I don't think we can conclude there is much similarity between the two franchise

I'm not sure how a team remains in the 4-7 win category for 8 going on 9 seasons without a dysfunctional upper management group. And if one subscribes to the notion it's all the GM/coach/players fault, who precisely hires the GM? Something is not right at OBD and the record spells that out. It's not normal for a team to ride the mediocrity roller coaster for so long without completely bottoming out or becoming a playoff caliber club.

Buddy said it would take 3-4 years to rebuild. So we're in year 1 of the second rebuild in 4 seasons. We just have to be patient. This times 1,000.

They're starting a guy at QB who was parked on the PS 2 weeks ago and for whom no other team would add to their active roster. If they don't sell out this week's game, it should be enough evidence that weather isn't the only reason why fans aren't going.

95M in local and state money isn't enough from taxpayers? The Bills can do what they want at the end of the day. But the hope and hype campaign is dying about where it always does (early to mid October) and fans aren't going. Why is it always the fans fault when games aren't sold out anyway? Don't the team executives who've presided over this ineptitude bear any responsibility, especially when they're reaping huge dollars to upgrade a place most people never go?

I think Russ Brandon, as he does with the fans typically the first week of January, should give the pre-motivational speech before Marrone on Sunday. He can start by telling them how on any given Sunday, they will be the most efficiently run team with more cap room than almost any other team and how they continue to sell product to more people per capita than any other franchise in the NFL.

So much for the cold-weather argument.

Zero NFL completions. One decent pre-season:

Brandon noted that the team's brand had been tarnished back in January, but I wonder if he realizes one of the reasons is because they play these games with their top talent. One hallmark of this organization has been an inability to anticipate how their decisions will impact other areas, which is what will happen if they trade Byrd. Then again, I doubt Brandon cares if he hurts the team's reputation so long as he can save the owner cash. Which means the brand remains tarnished in the league circles where credibility isn't based on your marketing plan.

Either Whaley was gambling or he doesn't have the say in personnel he should. Either way, it's not what NFL teams do.

"Meet the new boss...same as the old boss."

Guess Russ is going to have to spend some of that 20M in cap room after tonight's game.

Who has, for a backup QB, a rookie UDFA?

Can't be taking hits like that near the sideline...or anywhere if you're the QB. Especially when Jeff Tuel is the backup.

Did Colin Brown begin playing for Cleveland after the half?

Browns should be behind Buffalo in their rebuild, but yes, it appears anything but.

You can only hope he's learning on the job. Worst case is this is all he knows.

The Bills will need Byrd more as the season wears on and teams have more film of the Bills defense. For as well as that unit played yesterday, teams adapt and it's at this point where you need the most talent on the field at one time. In a league predicated on scoring, particularly through the air, turnovers are key. Buffalo isn't going to get 5 picks and some contests may turn on 1. I'd prefer a healthy Byrd over what played yesterday, even considering the result.

BTW, who is the backup QB should the starter get injured? I hope it doesn't happen, but EJ gets me worried when he takes off and doesn't exactly slide. That's the most dangerous scenario and their backup is an undrafted rookie FA.

If the Bills follow your guidance, the chances they sign their own players long term or in-demand free agents is even lower than it already is. You don't call players out and try to shame them into going on the field in the professional ranks. The Bills, according to LaCanfora, put out an offer about 1M per season less than what the market is paying for top safeties. Fans want to see Byrd on the field, but throwing him under the bus makes the rebuild even harder than it already is.