AJ1

There appears to a complete lack of imagination on the offense. What does it take to get an OC on this staff with more than half a brain? I've been asking that question for more than 6 years. Actually, about 9 out of the last 10. Seems to go hand-in-hand with no Oline.

You'll need a machinegun. How about banning the search for scapegoats? (only crickets chirping will break the silence of the board if banned)

What have the coaches done? It should be obvious that whatever 'system' of playcalling they're utilizing is isn't working and shows no signs of ever working. Sure, blame the quarterback. I think Fairchild and company have designed a guaranteed-to-lose set of plays for a young qb. I suspect that the plays are so rudimentary that opposing defenses can gameplan against the woebegone Bills in their sleep. Show some imagination. If this is the only offense they think Losman can run, it's time to start planning for a replacement. The replacement just might be the OC.

Tell me how you can determine the yards AT piled up yesterday weren't directly related to the line change and not a swap of backs? How?

Remind if I'm wrong, but I remember AT going about 8 yrds on 9 carries in game 2. Guess he wasn't running with heart in that game.

Pretty hard for Nall to get into a game because he is 3rd efing string. If Losman comes out Kelly goes in you, I won't call you a retard but you most likely are. If Nall plays, the other 2 qbs would have to be injured.

Let's see...Indy beat Tennessee 14 - 13 on Oct. 08. How in the NFL world did that happen?

The mentality here is if the QB doesn't perform as hoped in 10 to 16 games throw him out with the trash. I've stated before that that attitude will keep us on the bottom of the league FOREVER because all college QBs need to be trained to succeed in the NFL. Easily 95% of them need more than 16 games before one can definitively say anything about them. But this is the age of instant gratification, so a year approximates infinity for a lot of the posters here, especially the ones under age 40.

What I'm looking for in draft is RG or RT/G number 1 or 2, depending on how Pennington finishes. I agree CV is washed up; probably was when he came to the Bills with TD's rep as a trash collector.

He's holding his team hostage and the management doesn't have the guts to tell him to go away.

There are some truly f***ing aholes contributors on this board. The ones that complained about JP's throw on that TD are in the first rank of that group. I just saw the replay. Get F***ed aholes.

On the other hand, it used to take 3 to 5 YEARS before an Oline got in sync. Is the new requirement 2 weeks?

If the Bills had called that, we'd had a server meltdown.

Yeah, complaining about the qb on a 43 yd td pass when mister nobody is a frozen turd on the bench. Let's bring him in. These losers would turn on him in 3 seconds.

I hate prima donnas with a passion. TO is the all time worst sports' prima donna. If I have to appease a flipping ahole prima donna to win a championship, then I don't want the championship. The end doesn't always justify the means, does it? You read like you believe it does. I don't.

And you need a sound line, OC, QB coach before you can point to the QB as being 'the problem'. There are too many independent variables to rule out before one can conclude "Yep, the quarterback is the problem". If the Bills had at the very least had an adequate line, you might begin to draw that conclusion. Otherwise, the indefinite search for a miracle worker goes on.

If these so-called QB evaluators had their mindset in place at all the NFL franscises the new sport in town would be seeing how fast you could run green QBs out of town, not trying to build a winner. My guestimate is that by their criteria, 95% of the new QBs wouldn't make the grade.

The idea that drunken mobs roam the Bills parking lots looking for trouble after particularlly bad loses does not surprise me. In the ratio of drunken lunatics to normal people attendees of sport forums, only NASCAR exceeds NFL football, IMO. To encounter unpleasant people at or going to games they don't have to drunk. While traveling to the Oakland playoff game many years back, I had a nasty experience with an Oakland fan at a thruway rest stop. The guy was on the phone in full Raider regalia. I said in passing 'Changing your bet?' If it hadn't been a public place, I swear the guy would have pulled a gun on me. The look was bad enough.

He'd look good in a carwash, too. His vast QBing skills could be more adequately put to use there.

Regardless, I see RT or RG being top choices by Bills in '07 draft.

Did you ever hear of situational awareness? You go for the TD in that situation to make the score 21 - 10. Then you have a chance to win with 2 scores. The FG puts you 15 behind. Two TD's and a 2 pointer to TIE, an unlikely scenario at best. In one case you can say you going for a win and in the other you are going through the motions of-protect-your-assology by being 'smart'. Note the quotes.

I'm not surprised. He was too good to live anywhere near Buffalo as a player. Too good to act like a normal person on a plane. Five minutes after he's an ex-Bill he's dissing us. What a shi*head.

It's the dumbest rule in the NFL. On long gaining running plays especially the refs do not allow the offense reasonable time to get reset. Why penalize a team that just had a tremendous offensive play? Did I say the NFL was dumb on this. I've been complaining about it for years. If it makes common sense, the NFL isn't interested.

The race for the most INTs by our corners is still tied at 0. Keep up the good attentive work players and coaches.

What kind of concert did Ms. Crow give?