Jump to content

Dr. K

Community Member
  • Posts

    2,725
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Dr. K

  1. What in the name of heaven made you put an apostrophe in a person's name?
  2. Yes, I do know that. I even wrote a book about it. See my ID image.
  3. Better to play Peterman and look forward than Anderson, who has no future (not that Peterman has one, but at least he's not 35). But the rest of this season is all about the young players and finding out who will be on the team next year and who will not. It's all pre-season now.
  4. I don't see the long-term benefit of starting Anderson at this point. Yes, Peterman has been terrible but he is not 35 years old. I understand those fans who question why he is on the team. But here's the point: Mcdermott must think he needs him on the team. It could be that it's only as the disaster QB is Anderson gets hurt, but the offense is a disaster already. Two touchdowns in the last five games. Anderson is turning the ball over only slightly less than Peterman did. He was not brought in to play QB but to mentor, and I don't see any upside to playing him. Start Peterman until Allen gets back. Maybe he gets better. Probably not, but sre they going to score FEWER points with him at QB? If he is what most of us think he is, then McDermott will get it out of his system and he will be history.
  5. Much as I question the McBeane regime and hate the words "The Process," this sounds rational to me. McBeane get another season. But I am not confident about their personnel decisions given some of the choices they have made so far.
  6. He CREATED the freakin' cap mess. And there's no way, no matter how much money he has next year, that he will be able to fix the gaping holes on this roster.
  7. Not just Beane, but McDermott, too. I've been saying this since they started shedding talent the minute he walked in the door. If they sign another lame castoff from Carolina I am heading for One Bills Drive with a baseball bat. I give McDermott credit for fashioning a good defense, and for getting the team to play above their heads last season. But the rest of the story is miserable. And anybody who mentions "The Process" should be strung up by his thumbs, or laughed into oblivion.
  8. 35-24 Pats The Bills get up for the game and the defense scores at least one TD. But in the end the Pats grind them down.
  9. Their problem is not dead cap money. Their problem is their ability to judge talent.
  10. You left out the fumble.
  11. Looks like a very bad team to me. No real talent on offense. Occasional ability on defense. Roster drained of holdover talent. Much too many penalties, stupid and otherwise. The only hope is if some of the young players get better, and if the management makes good personnel decisions in the off season. But on the basis of the moves they have made so far, I question their ability to make roster decisions. Give them the year to get better or hang themselves. Give them next year, too, I guess, though right now they look clueless. If there is not serious improvement, cut off their heads.
  12. When Allen is completely healthy he should play.
  13. 1) When the Bills won the AFL title in 1964, everybody was talking about them and I got interested. I lived in Orchard Park. I was 14 years old. 2) In my mind the Bills are like the city of Buffalo--a hard luck, blue-collar team the reminds me of the family and people I grew up with. 3) Maybe my favorite memory was riding my bike to the MIlestrip Inn in the mid-1960s to watch the Bills practice in training camp. It was so low-rent and primitive. They had a scruffy football field behind this ordinary motel right next to the Thruway. The players walked out the back of the motel, across the parking lot, to the field to practice. I remember Harry Jacobs (a linebacker) wearing a golf hat as he came out carrying his helmet, joking with the six to ten fans who were there to watch. No bleachers, no amenities, just standing there by the field. The players seemed so much older than me, but they were probably only in their twenties or early thirties. They were half as big as the players today.
  14. Better than Rex's comedy routines. Rex's entertainment value did not keep him from being a terrible coach.
  15. If we March Peterman out there again...I will... . . . I will have such revenges on you both That all the world shall—I will do such things— What they are yet I know not, but they shall be The terrors of the earth. You think I’ll weep? No, I’ll not weep. King Lear, Act II, Scene IV
  16. Pegulas Pegulas Pegulas Pegulas Pegulas Pegulas Bills Bills Bills Bills Bills Bills Bills Bills Bills Bills Bills NOT "Pegula's" NOT "Bill's" NO APOSTROPHES!!!!! THESE ARE SIMPLE FREAKING PLURAL NOUNS, NOT POSSESSIVES OR CONTRACTIONS, YOU MORONS!!!!! (Takes deep breath) Hi. My name is John Kessel, I am a writer and an English professor.
  17. Try 54 years.
  18. Peterman really needs to be cut, I think. But I am not confident that Allen is going to pan out. I guess it's early yet, but as a passer he looks terrible.
  19. I know this season is all about Allen's development, but he ain't developing. At what point do we begin to conclude that Allen is not and will never be an NFL QB?
  20. Sure. Sounds reasonable. But if he's REALLY REALLY bad (Peterman at Chargers bad) for, say , five games in a row it will be hard for people to refrain, I think.
  21. Nope. I like the contrast far more than the all-whites.
  22. I saw Reservoir Dogs. I thought it sucked. Pulp Fiction was much better.
  23. After I read #4 I stopped reading. You are an ass.
×
×
  • Create New...