Dr. K

Why present a "poll" as if you think it is an open question when you already know the answer? That's fundamentally dishonest, and it was evident from your very first post. I did not even know what you opinion was before I clicked on this thread but it was instantly obvious as soon as I read that. Everything after that was blowing smoke.

You really are ridiculously dishonest. Just admit you think McDermott and Beane are the problem. I've got nothing more to say to you.

Really, your agenda is screaming out from under your "dispassionate" analysis. There are so many assumptions buried under the way you've put this that it's laughable even to engage with you. This is a waste of our time.

Any answer to this question is going to be subjective--especially when you frame it the way you did, which slants the answer toward blaming the coaching. This is an incredibly passive aggressive way to start another anti-McDermott thread. Why not just come out and say you blame McDermott for the Bills not winning a Super Bowl and call for his firing?

I swear to God that if the fans ran this team they would not win three games a year. They are hysterical. I hope most of them are not responsible for running anything important in the world.

This is my take on the article precisely. I can see why Dunn is angry and can imagine that some players are too. But whatever is substantive in this article is poisoned by Dunn's animus.

One of the quotes that article cites is a player saying "You don't get over a game like that." Duh. No kidding Sherlock. This quote says nothing about McDermott or anybody else. The writer just sticks it into his innuendo so that in that context it LOOKS LIKE it supports his implications about McDermott. That's what I mean when I say this is written like a 1956 Hollywood Confidential gossip column. It's adolescent BS pretending to be journalism.

This piece is written like a Hollywood gossip column from 1956, dripping with sarcasm and innuendo. It's childish.

He works for the State Department.

No No NO

This isn't a criticism, just an observation: from reading your posts over a long period of time, I realize your instincts and mine are pretty much exactly opposite. Some people who post here fall, in my mind, into the category of "fools." You do not. But when the traffic light is turning yellow, you hit the gas while I hit the brake. I don't think either choice is the "right" one--very few choices are right all of the time, but still....

Almost unreadable and then once you struggle through it you realize it wasn't worth reading.

Wow, how the hell did these two teams end up in this game. The Bills must be eating their livers out.

A good friend of mine is a longtime Bengals fan--as long suffering as us Bills fans--so my heart would like to see the Bengals win just for him. However, my head says the LA D-line is going to harass Burrow all day and he won't be able to create enough magic to overcome that. This reminds me a bit of the Raiders-Bucs Super Bowl at the end of the 2002 season, when people expected a close game. I had the feeling the Bucs would blow out the Raiders, and they did, 48-21

Nope. Here it is: Make the playoffs. Win every playoff game.

Prime numbers are good.

Maybe some of the fans on the Chiefs message board are trashy, but I lived in Lawrence KS and KC for ten years and the people there, and the fans, are salt of the earth types. Every team has its dirtbag fans, but I don't think the Chiefs fans are particularly offensive. Midwesterners are rather the contrary.

On a spit, roasted over a slow fire.

I just have a feeling that the Titans win this going away. I bet they are feeling disrespected big time. And I have a feeling that Henry will NOT be a big factor.

This is my biggest concern as well. But often what happens is these games is not at all what we expect. It could turn on the defense's ability to handle the running game, for all I know.

My most immediate question is how Dane Jackson will hold up against those KC perimeter receivers. He's been vulnerable to double moves among other things. If you compare the Bills D now to the Bills D in the game earlier this season, we were without Matt Milano then but had Tre'davious White. Now we're without White but have Milano back. If I had to choose, I'd rather have White than Milano. On the other hand, the Bills D in general has been playing well lately. It's going to be a toss-up, I think, with the weight on the offense to score whenever they have the ball, TDs instead of field goals, and not turn the ball over.

It really was one of the most amazing interceptions I've ever seen. Just miraculous. I was sure it was a touchdown.

Sean McDermott, Brian Daboll, and Josh Allen were stone cold killers last night. The whole team was. They were not going to let up.

. . . for release from Sean McDermott's head. The long-time New England Patriots coach seeks refugee status in some more favorable state, citing cruel and inhumane treatment by the Buffalo Bills' headman. "I can't take it anymore," Belichick was quoted as saying. "I mean, it's too cold in there. We're down 40-10 in the fourth and the SOB fakes a run and throws for the end zone. I need to get out of here." Queried about where he might like to relocate to, Belichick suggested he might be more at home in the heads of Adam Gase or Jennifer Lawrence.

This game made me very happy. After all the grief we have taken from the Pats over the last two decades, to see them ground into the turf was so soul satisfying that it's hard to express.