Azalin

"As for the date, time, and location, Presler wants to keep the specifics under wraps for now. “I don’t want there to be any organizing against us,” he said, specifically mentioning that he wouldn’t want a far-left “Antifa,” or anti-fascist, group to show up and protest."

Ugh, this looks like the world's worst ever set of bubble gum cards.

Maybe he'd understand your question more easily if you'd phrased it what American president colluded with an opposition party to overthrow a democratically elected prime minister?

You need to go back around 20 pages or so to the threads dealing with the 2016 republican primaries. If you do, you'll see almost everyone here was opposed to Trump, some vehemently so, and with that perspective should see how Trump has won people over.

She should have criticized white Christians, then she'd probably have been okay. And yes, absolutely.

'Asshat Propaganda'

So CNN is inept with regard to random sampling as well as reporting?

Heisenberg may have been a genius, but he wasn't near smart enough to compensate for that sh!t.

That would be quite a feat considering her density.

Please, please let all 750,000 of them rush area 51, please. What a massive cleansing of the gene pool.

That giant sucking sound...... RIP

On a somewhat humorous note, I received a text this evening from NOAA weather radar. Verbatim: "We have a report about thunderstorm in your area. Can you please confirm?" Forget for a moment about the bad grammar. This is one of the main organizations pushing MMGW and they need to ask me if there's a %$#@ing thunderstorm outside?! (yes, I am aware that weather and climate are two separate things, but organizational stupidity is apparently running rampant in NOAA)

I'm fine with it. It just means more available women for the rest of us.

One gets the impression that he doesn't consider mongols to be people.

He aspires to be like Tiberius some day.

What face?

I might just have to put her over my knee for draping herself in the flag like that.

Yeah, I raised an eyebrow at the notion that it's in hymnals across the land, and that the battle took place at Fort Henry. It sounds as if it was recorded as part of a sermon.

X2

One of the great things about free speech is that it makes it easy for the rest of us to identify the dangerously stupid.

If it should be legal to be masked but illegal to carry a weapon while doing so, how do we make that determination unless we simply stop and frisk people wearing masks? Remember that there are quite a few places that have laws already in place that make concealing your face in public illegal. So do we go after people wearing masks because they might have a legal weapon on their person, or do we respect gun ownership and allow people to arm themselves in public while keeping their faces hidden? Personally, I think that a lot fewer Klansmen and antifa would have the nerve to incite violence if the world could see them doing so.

It wouldn't surprise me one bit.

I've owned several over the years myself. I've found that nothing will make a band fall apart faster than getting it it's own domain name.

I'm curious as to what all of you think. Many places in the US actually have anti-mask laws on the books, but I don't know if any are enforced. From what I've read, many (if not most) were enacted as a measure against the KKK hiding their identities; some were passed as a way to discourage anonymous acts of violence in union/management and tenant/landlord disputes. More recently, we've had the 99 percenters with their V masks, and now antifa with their ski masks. All concealing their identities in public to avoid being identified as having engaged in violence upon others. Would the violence drop dramatically, if at all, if nobody was allowed to hide their faces in public? Would denying citizens the ability to mask themselves in public be a violation of their constitutional liberties?

Well, yeah - they have a mansion full of musical ghosts, our mansion just has a middle-aged Governor.