DanInUticaTampa

I know. Floyed is a grade A talent. Only knock on him is he doesn't get seperation like the elite guys, but he has good hands. The alcohol stuff bothered me since it was like 3 times. 3 times shows too much of a pattern to draft him at ten.

Me too. Funny with the jests fans shouting "we want ingrahm" then coples got called haha

I don't know. Pats* d just got better in like 10 mins

If the bills are betting it all on easley, then that is going to annoy me the same way they bet that merriman would solve their pass rush. With that said, I think they draft a stud wr tomorrow.

I don't hate the gilmore pick, but I would have traded down and grabbed hightower.

I find it odd jests fans always boo all the time, but giants fans are pretty quiet. I do love they boo the hell out of the phins and just ignore the bills

I was thinking that too haha

Because we didnt draft a wr or ot with our only draft pick of course

I like those options there

Well, tuesday was a couple days ago...

Yeah, but 3 players don't make up the whole secondary... Plus, I think mckelvin is still suspect, and there is a good chance he won't even be on this team after this year. But that is moot if they draft barron, because he is a saftey. I think the position barron would most likely commmand would be Bryan Scotts position. the type that switches between saftey/linebacker to cover the tight ends. but that is really a position I am not familiar with. Someone here explained it pretty well, but I forget the explanation. But if barron were on the team, he would be moved to bryan scott's roll, and scott would be a backup to him, I guess.

On the negative side, the season is months away

Richardson and cox would light up the phones way more than gilmore and barron would, that's for sure

Yeah, not the worst pick, but he isn't a nix guy

In that case, best to trade down. Someone will really want tanahill or cox or Richardson. No way does one of the top 4 players fall to us.

I think he is really just coaching the running backs, and maybe now and then gailey deligates something to him. I don't really know all his duties, but I think he is a coordinator in name only based on how much gailey is hands on with the offense.

hahaha

exactly. but by bringing in a new coordinator, we aren't switching modkins with a new coordinator, we are basically switching gailey out for the coordinator, which is silly. it is a step backwards to competley change the plan. if they are going to just go and change an entire offense, they might as well change everything else. I find it crazy that someone wants to change the offense with a new coordinator after we already have a new defense. We might as well rid of nix, gailey, and get a new special teams coach as well if we are going to gut both the offense and defense in one offseason.

I haven't seen much of Zach Brown, but from what I have been hearing, i really don't want him. I really like the idea of drafting russel wilson. He doesn't seem like a nix type, but I think he would be a great late round addition. if hieght is the only knock against him, it can't hurt havning him as a backup.

you are going to be very disappointed. after the draft, there are going to be conspiracy theories the stadium leasing, crazy speculation on who is part of jim kelly's "group" of investors, silly things that show up in stevie's twitter.... in the offeason, everyone stops talking after the draft. happens every year. there will be nothing to talk about until the preseason. The highlights in between will be when the rookies sign. that's it. Really, any topic between after the draft and training camp is going to look like crap next to the draft discussion. "it must be the offseason" will be posted in just about any thread that is created. happens every year around here. But keeping modkins is important. The offense has been successful, it is on the right track, and bringing in another coordinator with a new playbook with just throw all that out the window. For all you know, stevie, fitz, and jackson could totally suck with a new playbook. Especially stevie who benifits a lot from chan's system. Bringing in a coordinator that is "proven" is going to want to bring in his own playbook, and that just sounds silly. I love fitz and all, but I don't think having him learn a new playbook is going to make him any better.

Why would a proven coordinator come to a losing team without a top ten QB to be a coordinator on a team where he doesn't get to call the plays? I don't think gailey is going to let anyone else call the offense. I think the way he worded it was (paraphrasing) "I am going to get it to where I want it to be, then pass the duties on. But I want to get the offense to where I want it first." There is no point in bringing in a "proven coordinator." Doing that would change up the whole offense. no proven coordinator is going to come in and do the same thing chan is doing. he is going to want to bring in his own playbook. I think it is a waste of time to bring in a proven coordinator at this point, because we would basically be starting over. we already got a proven coordinator on the team, he just also happens to be the HC.

So does this mean nix is planning to bring home the bacon?

He isn't saying minny is taking richarson, he is saying based on what has been released, nfl gms feel Richardson is the third best player in the draft. Polian even says he might be number one

I think drafting him is a more likely than drafting an ot at this point. I am thinking their top to choices are gilmore and Floyd based on the way they have talked this week. Baron, if drafted, might be trade bait move down. But it wouldn't be terrible if we keep him. I would rather have someone else than a saftey, unless they think he is a hall of famer

I don't think Reif is a reach, but I think people here are hard on him because he isn't that exciting. I think that would be a good pick for us, but I also think there is a chance he gets picked before we pick. If reiff is the pick, I'd be happy. I think he is starter material at the very least