DanInUticaTampa

Spencer Johnson is staying. He is playing pretty well and I think they have him where he plays both dt and de, which makes him more useful. Troup and heard seem to be the most likely to cut

Victory? Virtuous? Vicarious? Vacation? Violin?

I thought it was a bad idea to go after him. I was disappointed that out of all the receivers in free agency, THAT was the one they decided to go after. But what's done is done, and he isn't on the team.

I'm sensing a cut as well. At this point, I can't see the bills keeping him over Roosevelt

With these officials, I would second guess all penalties

I think he looks ok at LT. I think the pick was still great, because even if he doesn't work out at LT, I'm sure he will be able to play RT or guard. I can't complain using high picks on the offensive line.

Best reply ever haha

The "awful" seems way off though. Last week I would have agreed, but he looked a lot better tonight. He looked like good backup material actually

He seemed ok tonight.

That won't happen. If they did that it would immediately start a qb controversy.

To get their act together

That was a nice block

So far best part about the game, no interceptions! Go Fitz!

If we are holding back, at least the jests won't have much tape to go on

No way they are giving 100%, but they shouldn't look this bad.

Doom isn't the right word. "lost" seems more fitting. I love sheppard, but I worry that he isn't ready yet

Linebacker looks like a bigger need than reciever right now

Pretty much my feelings. Hoping it all comes together September 9th

Thank you for proving nothing. That would be like comparing Aaron rodgers' first three years and mark sanchez's first 3, while Aaron sat behind favre. If you want to use stats, use them right Hahaha. Funny thing is, fraizer, current vikings hc, was wanted by bills fans over Chan gailey

I wouldn't use a high pick. Guy has talent, but has too many health issues and he is an odd duck in general.

Who here used the words "not" and "whatever" to describe their feelings of re-signing any of these guys? I know I have a few people on ignore, but I think I read all the posts in this this thread and font see where you are seeing people say that stuff. And I don't see the difference in signing a player now, or October, or November, or in January. Can you please break down why it is so different? Why would it be different if we signed them now instead of say January? Better yet, how would things be better if we signed Stevie in December instead of when we did? Would he be a better player or love the team more just because he signed a few months early? Because I really think that Stevie would still be the same player and still be a bill if he signed with us a month earlier, but maybe I'm crazy

When I clicked on this thread I was expecting an espn video of Chan ranting. I am disappointed

Why are you talking about Easley in what is clearly a Wes Welker thread?

I think there is a misunderstanding. No one said to wait until free agency starts to re-sign players. People were saying there was no rush to sign these players RIGHT now like the OP suggests. It doesn't matter if they sign them now, October, November, December, or whatever. But saying that this needs to be done right away is just not true. There is no rush. If this was February then ya, put a rush on it.

I believe they have already have done some soft talking with levitre's agent