DanInUticaTampa

Ellis is a waste. I wouldn't mind Kelsay at all as a back up, but his contract is ridiculously overpaying him.

Because the coaching staff has said they plan to move him and ellis to OLB. Normally, when coaches have plans for players, they don't cut them.

I forgot about chambers. This sounds more likely.

With no TO or Reed we are going to be signing some kind of a Vet reciever. I don't see us going in with just evans, hardy, parrish, and johnson. Parrish isn't good enough to start (and might even get traded away) and hardy/johnson have very limited experience. Anyone thinking we might sign bryant? There aren't exactly a lot of options in FA. I think we need a vet reciever, but shouldn't really draft one since we already have 2 young ones we should develop more.

superbowl!

Two Tebow threads started by the same fella within the same 10 minutes? c'mon.....

Well, we got a 100 years to think about trading up if we want to.

I don't like the idea of taking trent williams with the 9th pick. Unless by "williams" it is Dan williams, which I am more than fine with. Most of the other picks seem to be ok.

Brohm has more upside, but I don't think he should be the starter week 1, if at all. But we haven't really seen enough of him yet.

Forget cambell. I am sick of hearing Tebow discussions. And feb 13th, what was that? like 2 weeks ago? not that long.

The kind that is fun to play inside.

could be for any california team.

39 starts in 4 years does not mean back up. It means he started more than half his carreer. And that doesn't even include what would have happened if he didn't go on IR last season.

ooops

He obviously doesn't seem anything great, and it is hard to picture him as a future star. But he is young, so there is a lot of chance for improvement. And if by some miracle the switch to OLB makes him at least good, if not great, I would be incredibly happy. But that is a huge if.

I would be happy with any of those picks.

They wouldn't need to use all their draft resources. Especially if they pick up a player or two in FA. What they really need is a NT and they need an OLB. They could use some depth too. But they really need to only grab two players. That won't take up all their draft picks. Like I said, they might pickup the OLB or the NT in FA.

I don't like the recievers. needs more umph. With no TO and Reed, there needs to be something more there.

the stadium wall.

They probably are going to trade him (not to us). Wasn't he saying that he was fine with everything, but he did NOT want to be tagged? I mean, the last thing the pats* should want is a disgruntled NT and one of their only good players left on D.

The best part about this mock is I think this guy actually knows something about Our team.

I like how that site gives you their agent too. That can kinda help offer some insight as to something about who they sign with.

hahaha

Jones maybe for RT. But since they didn't go after him last year, I doubt anything changes this year. If we get a stud (or something decent) at NT is FA, that would be great. That is a huge whole on this team and I don't think we should throw a rookie in there. I don't see us signing a guy like hampton or wilfork though. But NT seems to be something we will HAVE to do in FA.

agreed