DanInUticaTampa

Yeah, that one looks pretty good.

I wouldn't go that far. Seems like slim pickins for the most part.

good thread.

Probably if in case he fell to use. Stranger things have happened.

yeah, it would be too much to give up on a player we aren't sure about. Could be a rob johnson mistake, which is scary.

I think there will be either an LT or a QB there. All the teams that need a QB also need a LT. I am thinking there is a good chance at least one of them falls to us. I mean, I can't see three OTs and 2 QBs going with the first 8 picks when there are 2 elite DTs in there as well. I am sure someone is going to fall to us.

He wasn't saying his prediction was written in stone. It was just a prediction. We know predictions are almost blind this time of year. But everyone makes them. People are already predicting who is going to win the next superbowl. There is nothing wrong with making a prediction. Calm down.

Their history.

If we are moving to the number 2 spot, take one of the DTs. But I hope (and pretty sure we wont) we are not moving up. That would be stupid.

Trent Williams at 9 is not cool.

If that is how it turns out, I wouldn't mind taking either Clausen or Dan Williams with the 9th pick. No trading up though, at least trading up from our 1st pick. That is ridiculous. Trading down is questionable. Kinda hard to tell where the players will end up. If we trade down and both clausen and williams are before we pick, that would kinda suck.

Well, that is bascially the same oline we had last year for awhile, with the exception of a "stud LT." Most people believe that we need two tackles, and I would agree. I don't like playing musical chairs with linemen. It never lets them mesh together, which is really important for an oline. If we juggle Levitre to RT, and wood to C, it is just going to jumble it more. That didn't work last year, and it won't work this year. And as far as the QB and WR situation.... no one said that we aren't going to address those. but going into next year with basically the same oline as last year doesn't seem wise.

this

I am guessing it is the Oline's fault that there isn't enough time to get open, and when he is open, the ball is either thrown somewhere else or it is a bad throw to him. I don't know what the deal was, but Edwards and Lee never had that connection. Edwards threw better to TO than he did to Lee, even though he and Lee knew eachother better. But there seemed to be a lot of miscommunication between the two of them.

Yes, because that is what Jauron said about Steve Johnson . That Jauron, always talking down about players! why doesn't he ever say they play hard, are good players, and that we are lucky to have them? Why not?!

I was disappointed with the show. It is really behind the scenes of the stuff I don't care about. It is all about crowd control, musical acts, and random event planning stuff. I was thinking there was going to be some actually football stuff going on. That Mcgraw thing was wierd though. I was kinda pissed when he got some cheers from the small crowd outside. He had douchebag written all over him.

Lee takes a lot of crap. He might not be worth all the money, but I do think he is a #1 reciever. If lee is nothing more than a #2, then that many teams in the NFL don't have a number 1 reciever. Granted, Lee isn't an elite reciever. But he is a number one, even if he is average at best. But I think it is easy to say that he would be much better if he had better QB play. Last year was probably the worst as far as our QB and Olines go.

We aslo don't have problems with our kickers

Making two good plays does not make you a number 2 reciever. I don't know how else to tell you my opinion, or why you think i am arguing with myself.

Chambers seems to be the popular choice. I think Bryant would be doable as well. They aren't as big as TO, and they aren't really that great. But they are vets and would be better than drafting a WR. WRs in the later rounds take years to develop. We are already developing 2 young recievers. We need a vet in there that can work right away.

Boldin would require a trade and we would at least lose our 2nd rounder. So no. We need our top two picks for an OT or an NT. Or maybe even a QB. Can't use a draft pick on him when we can fill the receiver role through FA.

No. I am saying making two good plays in two years doesn't make you a number 2 reciever.

Steve Johnson cannot be our 2nd reciever. He has barely done anything. He has had a couple beautiful TD catches. But he hasn't really brought anything else. He hasn't been one to move the chains for us or anything like that. He could still develop into that role. But he just isn't there yet. We need a Vet in here like Chambers or Bryant. They aren't great, but they would be solid help.

Fixed.